GMAT Club
January 09, 2026
sequimaxime

Joined: Dec 31, 2025

Posts: 50

Kudos: 1

Verified GMAT Focus score:
525 Q82 V75 DI71

TTP quant section

REVIEWER IDENTITY VERIFIED by score report [?]

Improvement 80 Points

Course Target Test Prep Flexible Prep

Location Online

Strengths:

Target Test Prep’s biggest strength is its Quant curriculum. It is the most structured, comprehensive, and logically built GMAT Quant program I have used. Every topic is broken down into clear concepts, followed by increasing levels of difficulty that actually train test-taking ability, not just formula memorization. The error tracking, analytics, and adaptive review system are extremely effective in identifying weak areas and forcing mastery. The question quality is very close to official GMAT level, especially for medium and hard problems. For someone targeting a high Quant percentile, TTP provides a disciplined, step-by-step path that genuinely works if followed seriously

Would make the product better:

The main area that needs improvement is the Verbal section, especially Critical Reasoning and Reading Comprehension. Compared to Quant, the verbal curriculum feels mechanical and overly rule-based, which does not translate well to the real GMAT. Many verbal questions rely more on intuition, logic, and language sensitivity than on rigid frameworks, but TTP pushes heavy processes that slow you down. The RC explanations are often too shallow, and the CR strategy can make you overthink simple arguments. TTP should focus more on real-test style reasoning, official-level passages, and teaching how to think rather than just how tThe main area that needs improvement is the Verbal section, especially Critical Reasoning and Reading Comprehension. Compared to Quant, the verbal curriculum feels mechanical and overly rule-based, which does not translate well to the real GMAT. Many verbal questions rely more on intuition, logic, and language sensitivity than on rigid frameworks, but TTP pushes heavy processes that slow you down. The RC explanations are often too shallow, and the CR strategy can make you overthink simple arguments. TTP should focus more on real-test style reasoning, official-level passages, and teaching how to think rather than just how to eliminateo eliminate

I used Target Test Prep mainly to improve my GMAT score and my experience was very mixed depending on the section. For Quant, TTP is outstanding. The depth, organization, and difficulty progression are exactly what a serious GMAT student needs. It helped me build strong fundamentals and improve accuracy on hard problems. However, the Verbal section was disappointing. Despite spending significant time on it, my Verbal performance did not improve and in some cases even became worse because I started overanalyzing simple questions. The strategies feel artificial and do not match how the official GMAT actually tests reasoning. Overall, I strongly recommend TTP for Quant but would suggest using a different resource for Verbal if you are aiming for a balanced high score.

Login to create/modify/remove your own comments