TTP is the best starting material if you are an absolute beginner with lot of time and very little quant knowledge. Their material is very through and gives you a strong concept and fundamentals for all topics
I would highly recommend it however if you are good and quants and don’t need much help then I would suggest you look for verbal focused study package as their verbal was sort of mix bag. I didn’t find it wrong or inaccurate but solving them didn’t give me enough confidence about my GMAT.
For Data insight the material is good however they should add more questions for practice.

I would suggest you don’t pause the subscription for long as it will harm your prep be consistent and use it wisely, if you know a topic try some questions and skip theory

Read More

I used Target Test Prep across a 6–7 month prep journey that took me from a 685 to a 725 (99th percentile), and I can say with confidence that TTP was the single biggest factor behind that improvement.
What sets TTP apart is the depth of its curriculum. Rather than teaching you shortcuts or tricks, the course rebuilds your understanding of every concept from the ground up — which is exactly what the GMAT rewards. The structured flow meant I always knew what to study next, and the review sets and notes made retention far more manageable than I expected.
The other standout feature for me was the error log and analytics. Even after six months of prep, I could pull up mistakes from my earliest practice sessions with full context on what went wrong. That level of traceability was invaluable heading into my later attempts - it helped me close gaps I didn't even know were still open, and gave my revision a precision that generic re-studying simply can't replicate.
If you're serious about the GMAT and willing to put in the work, TTP gives you everything you need to maximise your outcome. Highly recommended.

Read More

The platform's broader ecosystem was equally strong. The sectional mocks helped me build time management instincts and exam composure progressively, before Sigma-X full mocks introduced full-test conditions. The analytics in Scholaranium helped me identify my weakest question types with precision, and the error log helped me distinguish conceptual gaps from execution errors under pressure. The quality of DI practice questions was genuinely impressive — often harder than official questions, which meant I arrived at the exam well-prepared for whatever appeared. I went in with confidence earned through preparation, not false optimism. For anyone serious about meaningful GMAT improvement, e-GMAT is a complete, self-sufficient platform. I recommend it without reservation.

Read More

I am incredibly grateful to the GMATWhiz team for helping me achieve my target GMAT score of 695.

After nearly 8 months of self-study + e-GMAT prep course, I found myself stuck at 595 and had honestly lost confidence and motivation.

Joining GMATWhiz and working one-on-one with my mentors completely changed that trajectory. Piyush (Quant) and Sunita Ma’am (Verbal) are truly exceptional mentors. They took the time to deeply understand my strengths and weaknesses and crafted precise strategies tailored to my needs.

Piyush has an outstanding command over Quant and knows exactly what it takes to master the section. More importantly, he believed in my potential even when I didn’t, and played a huge role in rebuilding my confidence from the ground up. Sunita Ma’am's ability to analyse my verbal reasoning process and pinpoint subtle gaps made a huge difference in my performance.

What sets them apart is not just their teaching, but their genuine care and support. They were always approachable, patient, and encouraging, never once making me feel discouraged, even during retakes or low moments. Their mentorship went far beyond just academics; they helped me develop confidence, discipline, and a positive mindset.

Improving from 595 to 695 felt like a huge comeback for me, and I truly believe it would not have been possible without their guidance and support.

I would wholeheartedly recommend GMATWhiz to anyone who feels stuck, underconfident, or in need of the right mentorship. You don’t just learn Quant and Verbal with GMATWhiz, you grow in ways that stay with you far beyond the exam!

Read More

The practice tests are similar to the Official GMAT Test and it is a great cost-benefit way to approach the GMAT Test comparing to peers. The Data Insights section of EG's tests is my favorite, because it lets the student practice with a similar dynamic to that of the GMAT Official Test regarding question time and difficulty. I've encountered no bugs in +10 tests done in the platform, so nothing disrupts the testmaker while doing it. For other test-takers, I suggest being more conservative about the score obtained in the practice tests; in general, Expert Global's questions are harder than the Official ones.

Read More

My experience with e-GMAT has been extremely impactful for my GMAT preparation. The platform’s structured methodology helped me move from concept learning to process mastery. The verbal frameworks, in particular, trained me to think logically and eliminate answer choices with precision. Scholaranium and Neuron provided deep, targeted practice that made my preparation highly data-driven.

A special mention to my mentor, Dhruv, whose guidance played a key role in my progress. His analysis was detailed, honest, and execution-focused—covering not just conceptual gaps but also timing strategy, stamina, and behavioral patterns under pressure. This mentorship added a personalized layer to an already strong course structure.

Overall, e-GMAT is a comprehensive and rigorous prep solution best suited for serious aspirants looking for measurable score improvement through disciplined preparation.

Read More

Target Test Prep played a significant role in strengthening my preparation, especially in Quant and Data Sufficiency. The course focuses heavily on building strong fundamentals before moving to advanced difficulty levels, which helped me eliminate conceptual gaps. The large volume of practice questions ensures that you are exposed to a wide variety of question types and difficulty levels, reinforcing both accuracy and speed.

One of the most valuable features for me was the automatic error log. It systematically tracks your mistakes, making it easy to identify patterns and narrow down weak areas. This allowed me to work strategically instead of studying randomly. The structured study plan and clear goals also helped me stay disciplined and consistently monitor my progress.

The verbal section is equally robust, offering ample practice to build confidence. The interface is clean and user-friendly, making daily study seamless. Adding full-length mock tests would make the platform even more comprehensive.

Read More

Experts’ Global is a solid GMAT prep platform, especially for students looking for extensive mock practice at a reasonable cost. The standout feature is the availability of around 15 full-length mock tests, which helps build exam stamina and improve time management. The questions are generally aligned with GMAT difficulty, and the analytics are useful for identifying weak areas. While the mocks are not fully adaptive like official GMAT tests, they are still effective for practice and revision. Overall, Experts’ Global offers good value for money and is well-suited for self-driven aspirants who want practice-heavy preparation. It was very helpful in preparation of GMAT.

Read More

I enrolled in the eGMAT Last Mile Program after receiving an invite and was initially skeptical about following personalized advice instead of my own study instincts. What made the experience impactful was the mentorship, especially my interactions with Abha Mohan. She took the time to deeply analyze my performance, identify precise weaknesses in my approach, and then assigned focused tasks to help convert those weaknesses into strengths.

The guidance was highly personalized rather than generic, and it addressed not just content gaps but also decision-making under time pressure. Within a few days of implementing her suggestions, I could already notice a clear improvement in how I approached questions.

The program requires trust and discipline, but if followed sincerely, it delivers tangible results. Overall, the Last Mile Program is well-suited for test-takers who want structured, mentor-driven feedback to push their GMAT score higher.

Read More

My recent GMAT attempt was on Jan 6, 2026. I scored 100 percentile in Quant, with V82 and DI 78. This was my second GMAT (Focus Edition) attempt. In my previous attempts (10th gen GMAT), I had never scored a 100 percentile in Quant.

This time, my prep time was 10 focused days. Since I had already completed the eGMAT course earlier, my goal was to fix my strategy and improve my approach to tackling questions, rather than relearning concepts.

Because I planned to take the GMAT within 10 days, I prioritised Quant and RC in Verbal (my weaker areas). I did not focus much on DI.

Quant

eGMAT’s Scholaranium was really helpful. Though the quiz questions are on the higher difficulty side, IMO it prepared me well for the actual exam day.

A few things worth noting about the Scholaranium platform:

1. It helped me identify my weak topics clearly
2. It improved my time management by showing detailed time statistics
3. The mixed tests (Cementing and Test Readiness) are very helpful in preparing for the overall section

Verbal

Thanks to Rashmi Vaidya (my GMAT mentor), I was able to improve my RC sub-section performance from the mid-50s to 90.

The same Scholaranium advantages apply here, but personally, what made the real difference was Rashmi’s guidance:

1. I started approaching RCs in a much more systematic way. I refined my process from over-focusing on details to understanding the purpose of each paragraph and how it connects to the overall passage
2. With the Neuron platform (Official Question Bank), I was able to apply these concepts on challenging RC topics. This practice on Neuron really stabilized my RC approach
3. Since CR was a strong area for me, I didn’t practice it much. But hindsight, this turned out to be a mistake. I made a few silly errors. Evidence: with just 5 mistakes in Verbal, I scored 82, which felt a bit harsh. Nonetheless, Rashmi and I were able to identify that these were likely careless mistakes

The real strength of eGMAT lies in its platform: Scholaranium and Neuron (Official Question Bank).

I will definitely try another attempt, this time fully leveraging both the platform and Rashmi’s guidance.

I would recommend eGMAT to anyone looking to improve their GMAT score.

Read More