Six points of Data Insights. That is my whole improvement.

My first official attempt was a 615 carrying a DI77, and I finished at 675: V83, Q84, DI83, the 95th percentile. Verbal and quant each moved by a single point.

Two years of on and off prep, a course already finished once, and no way to test if any of it worked. I practised off PDFs and ran my own timer. I kept an error log with no idea whether it was any good, and there was nobody to help me figure out where exactly I was messing up. I had even bought this course back in 2021 and abandoned it after one mock, out of pure nerves.

e-GMAT starts at the diagnosis. The Personalised Study Plan takes your target, your test date and the hours you can honestly commit, then tells you what is fixable in the time left. PACE does the same at topic level, a diagnostic you take before studying, sorting lessons into leave alone and learn properly. I ran it after verbal and it confirmed I could skip what I was already good at. That saved me weeks.

Then nothing ran on instinct. The end-of-topic cementing quizzes carry a pass mark you clear or retake, and they are brutal. My hard Word Problems set opened at 30 percent, then 20, then 20 again, then 20. I am an engineer. That stung.

The error-log template turned it around. It does not ask which answer I got wrong, it asks at which step in my own process I came off the rails. Quant stopped being a knowledge problem and became a behavioural one. The same set read 50 percent the next day. Timed sectionals in Scholaranium took my quant from a 78 in early June into the high eighties, touching 90 twice, and Neuron OG did the same for CR with full reasoning behind every official question. My hard sets went from the low fifties to 70 inside a week.

DI is where e-GMAT is doing something I have not seen elsewhere. The course is built type by type and broad enough that you learn the thinking, never a template. Hard Data Sufficiency went 30 to 80, Graphical Interpretation went 40 to 80, and MSR went 60 to 83 on medium and 50 to 77 on hard. TPA on hard went 70 to 80, my strongest sub-section by then.

The change I would point at is not a number. On an MSR I used to open the question and start hunting, and now I read every tab first, the units, the time periods, where each figure sits. Three minutes in there feels insane. You get all of it back.

Last Mile Push was not really teaching. It was a mentor reading my dashboards weekly, naming habits I could not see, and telling me the numbers were sound when I did not feel it.

One warning. The mocks here are built to punish. Some will hurt.

If you know the content and you are plateauing anyway, this is the one to buy, especially if DI is the section you have been hoping will sort itself out.

Read More

Strengths:

My most recent attempt came back 655 with a Q90, a perfect Quant. But the number I actually want to lead with is 20 percent, because that is what my first hard Critical Reasoning cementing quizzes scored, and Verbal was the section that turned around hardest. I went from that 20 percent to 85 in a single attempt, and I am sitting at 81 now, with the dip down to 81 being a completion penalty rather than a concept gap. Before e-GMAT I was self-studying from the Official Guide, and the problem was not effort. I was grinding through problem after problem without grasping the underlying concepts, because there was no framework to hang any of it on. If that description fits you, this is written for you. A friend of mine, Sarthak, who had used e-GMAT himself, recommended it for its in-depth orientation and its pre-thinking approach, and the sequenced study plan the course builds for you meant I stopped having to decide every morning what to work on next.

Would make the product better:

Scholaranium and Neuron were my go-to tools for pushing accuracy up, because that is where I could see concretely which concepts and question types I was still weak on and drill them directly. The pattern that worked was practising a specific type on Neuron and then re-testing it with a cementing quiz, and Two Part Analysis is the clearest example: it went from 40 percent to 90 percent that way. Graphics Interpretation I ran through the same loop with one change, analysing every question I had got wrong before touching another quiz, and the focused set after that closed at 80 percent. Multi Source Reasoning needed mapping the sources up front instead of re-reading all three each time, and that practice set landed at 80 percent as well. Verbal moved the same way underneath: my hard CR accuracy went from 45 to 70 and my sectionals went past 82 to 84 and 90. This is where e-GMAT is genuinely different from working out of a book. A book tells you the answer. This tells you which question type, at which difficulty, is costing you the points, and then hands you the practice to close it.

The honest part is that none of it happened quickly. The toughest stretch was about a month of grinding through Verbal, question after question, with no movement in the results at all, and that kind of plateau is genuinely frustrating. What broke it was the LMP support and the mentor conversations. Before those I was not consistent; after them I started showing up daily. That mattered more for me than it might for most people, because I am based in a remote part of Odisha with no peer group to discuss prep with, so having someone there to encourage me whenever things were not moving was huge. It was one of the biggest reasons I kept going. So my recommendation is specific rather than general. If you are self-studying without a framework, or you are somewhere remote with nobody around you preparing for the same exam, e-GMAT and the LMP program can be a game changer, because of how extensive and well built the course is.

Read More

Strengths:

The verbal strategy is outstanding, methodical, clear, and effective. The dual question bank setup (Scholaranium + Neuron OG) means you never run out of quality practice material, which is critical when drilling weaker areas. The mentorship program is responsive and genuinely helpful, typically replying within a day. What I valued most was not having to figure out what to study. The program lays out the path and you just execute. That alone removes a huge mental burden during prep.

Would make the product better:

The PSP, which is the personalized study plan tailored to your availability and goals, could be more realistic in its time projections. In practice, when you hit a tough area and need to spend extra time on it, the schedule starts to drift. I was targeting a two to three month prep and ended up at six months. More buffer built into the plan for those inevitable sticking points would make the experience feel more accurate from the start.

I started my GMAT prep in late September sitting at the 56th percentile. By March, I scored 675, a 110 point increase and 95th percentile. eGMAT played a significant role in that journey. The verbal section strategy is where the program truly shines; it is structured, logical, and actually works. My CR performance went from a genuine weakness to 100th percentile, largely because of the depth of the question bank available. Having access to both Scholaranium and Neuron OG means you always have material to work through, no matter where you are in your prep. The LMP mentorship is a real differentiator, with fast and thoughtful responses that keep you on track. Most importantly, the program removes the guesswork. You do not have to design your own study plan from scratch; experienced people have already done that for you. For someone balancing GMAT prep with other commitments, that structure is invaluable.

Read More

Strengths:

The e-GMAT mentorship programme was one of the strongest parts of my preparation journey because it added structure, accountability, and personalization to what can otherwise feel like a very overwhelming process. What stood out most was that the guidance was not generic — it was tailored to my performance patterns, strengths, and gaps. The mentors helped me think beyond just content and focus on strategy, timing, and test-taking discipline, which made the preparation process far more effective. I also found the regular tracking and clear study direction very valuable, especially during phases when consistency and confidence became difficult to maintain. Overall, the programme felt like a strong support system that combined academic guidance with practical

The e-GMAT platform is a very well-structured product for GMAT preparation, particularly for building conceptual clarity and practicing in a systematic way. The course content is broken down into granular modules, which makes it easier to master one concept at a time rather than feeling overwhelmed by the syllabus. One of the biggest strengths of the platform is the quality and depth of its practice questions and the way concepts are explained through step-by-step reasoning rather than shortcuts alone.

Another strong feature is the analytics and performance tracking, which help identify weak areas and recurring mistake patterns. This makes revision more targeted and efficient. The platform also does a good job of integrating learning with practice, ensuring that students reinforce concepts immediately after studying them.

Overall, the product provides a structured and comprehensive preparation ecosystem, especially for students who prefer a methodical and data-driven approach to GMAT preparation. When combined with the mentorship programme, it becomes an even more effective system for navigating the different stages of GMAT preparation.

Read More

Strengths:

I had received an invite for Egmat Last Mile Program. The best part of the program is that the mentors help you to indentify your weakness and give assignment to turn those weaknesses into strengths. I was initially skeptical of following all the advice that was given, but after the initial few days I could see improvement in my approaches.

Would make the product better:

One area of improvement could be providing a slightly clearer upfront roadmap of how the personalized assignments will evolve over time. Initially, it takes a few days to fully understand the rationale behind certain recommendations. A brief orientation or sample success path at the start of the Last Mile Program could help reduce initial skepticism and build confidence faster.

I enrolled in the eGMAT Last Mile Program after receiving an invite and was initially skeptical about following personalized advice instead of my own study instincts. What made the experience impactful was the mentorship, especially my interactions with Abha Mohan. She took the time to deeply analyze my performance, identify precise weaknesses in my approach, and then assigned focused tasks to help convert those weaknesses into strengths.

The guidance was highly personalized rather than generic, and it addressed not just content gaps but also decision-making under time pressure. Within a few days of implementing her suggestions, I could already notice a clear improvement in how I approached questions.

The program requires trust and discipline, but if followed sincerely, it delivers tangible results. Overall, the Last Mile Program is well-suited for test-takers who want structured, mentor-driven feedback to push their GMAT score higher.

Read More

My recent GMAT attempt was on Jan 6, 2026. I scored 100 percentile in Quant, with V82 and DI 78. This was my second GMAT (Focus Edition) attempt. In my previous attempts (10th gen GMAT), I had never scored a 100 percentile in Quant.

This time, my prep time was 10 focused days. Since I had already completed the eGMAT course earlier, my goal was to fix my strategy and improve my approach to tackling questions, rather than relearning concepts.

Because I planned to take the GMAT within 10 days, I prioritised Quant and RC in Verbal (my weaker areas). I did not focus much on DI.

Quant

eGMAT’s Scholaranium was really helpful. Though the quiz questions are on the higher difficulty side, IMO it prepared me well for the actual exam day.

A few things worth noting about the Scholaranium platform:

1. It helped me identify my weak topics clearly
2. It improved my time management by showing detailed time statistics
3. The mixed tests (Cementing and Test Readiness) are very helpful in preparing for the overall section

Verbal

Thanks to Rashmi Vaidya (my GMAT mentor), I was able to improve my RC sub-section performance from the mid-50s to 90.

The same Scholaranium advantages apply here, but personally, what made the real difference was Rashmi’s guidance:

1. I started approaching RCs in a much more systematic way. I refined my process from over-focusing on details to understanding the purpose of each paragraph and how it connects to the overall passage
2. With the Neuron platform (Official Question Bank), I was able to apply these concepts on challenging RC topics. This practice on Neuron really stabilized my RC approach
3. Since CR was a strong area for me, I didn’t practice it much. But hindsight, this turned out to be a mistake. I made a few silly errors. Evidence: with just 5 mistakes in Verbal, I scored 82, which felt a bit harsh. Nonetheless, Rashmi and I were able to identify that these were likely careless mistakes

The real strength of eGMAT lies in its platform: Scholaranium and Neuron (Official Question Bank).

I will definitely try another attempt, this time fully leveraging both the platform and Rashmi’s guidance.

I would recommend eGMAT to anyone looking to improve their GMAT score.

Read More

Strengths:

1. Last mile push 1-1 mentorship program
2. Neuron portal that has access to all official GMAT questions
3. Scholaranium has thousands of practice quizzes and so many sectional mocks.
4. Sigmax mocks that have the standard of the official GMAT exam standards.
5. 24/7 expert support to address any queries/doubts within a span of a few hours.
6. Wide range of difficulty and topics covered in all sections

Would make the product better:

I don't think there are any improvements needed on the e-GMAT platform

Rashmi Vaidya is my mentor in the last-mile push mentorship program on the e-GMAT platform; she guided me for the last 6 months. She is very supportive and encouraged me to get a good GMAT score. She always believed in me, even in times when I could not see hope (when I reached learning plateaus in the preparation stage). Overall, I owe a lot to my mentor and e-GMAT. Only with their help, I improved from a 615-ish score to a 665 official score
Thanks to the whole team for supporting me throughout. You are the best GMAT preparation platform. This is not a paid review, by the way.
Definitely would recommend it to all the students.
Do try it out, guys!!!!

Read More

Strengths:

EGMAT’s biggest strength is its structured, process driven approach, especially for Quant, DI, and CR. The content breaks complex topics into clear frameworks, which helps avoid ad hoc solving and improves consistency. The cementing quizzes, sectional mocks, and analytics are particularly useful for identifying patterns in mistakes and timing issues. DI preparation including GITA, TPA, and MSR is far more comprehensive than most other platforms, and the course does a good job of preparing students for edge cases and high pressure scenarios. Faculty support and strategy discussions also add strong value, especially closer to the exam.

Would make the product better:

Some practice content, especially in Scholaranium and hard CR and DI sets, can feel significantly harder than the actual GMAT, which may affect confidence near test day. A clearer distinction between exam level and stretch level questions would help. DI sets occasionally include unusually large or unconventional question formats that are not fully representative of official tests. A more streamlined last week revision roadmap and clearer guidance on when to stop heavy practice and shift to consolidation would also improve the experience.

EGMAT is a rigorous and well structured GMAT preparation platform that is especially effective for students targeting high scores. The course places strong emphasis on building disciplined thinking and repeatable processes rather than relying on shortcuts or intuition. This is particularly valuable in Quant and DI, where consistency and decision making under time pressure matter more than isolated tricks. The cementing quizzes and sectional tests help reinforce concepts methodically and expose recurring error patterns, while the analytics provide meaningful insight into timing and accuracy issues. Although some advanced material, especially in Scholaranium, is harder than official GMAT difficulty, it helps build resilience and mental stamina. Overall, EGMAT significantly improves clarity, confidence, and execution, making it a strong choice for serious test takers willing to put in structured effort.

Read More

E-GMAT’s greatest strength is its exceptional mentorship. The mentors are extremely supportive, approachable, and available whenever you need guidance. They help you identify your weaknesses with precision and work with you closely to overcome them, whether it’s breaking through a score plateau or keeping your morale high during preparation. Another major strength is that the mentors don’t force you to go through the entire course; instead, they focus on what you specifically need, making the preparation process highly efficient.

Additionally, the course material is very well curated, easy to understand, and designed to help you grasp concepts quickly and effectively.

Relatively too, my experience with e-gmat was way better than the other over-marketed and costly preparation platforms that are not ready to help you out with your particular problems and fixate on the fact that you should complete their course however long it takes with no regards to your time constraints.

I recommend e-gmat to all the students whether they are starting out their gmat journey, are in the middle of their GMAT journey or have appeared for the exam and are looking to boost their score with another attempt.

Read More

Strengths:

1. The verbal course quality is top-notch.
2. Mocks and Quizzes are on GMAT level or tougher
3. They have a platform called Neuron where you can find all the OG questions to practice and make Quiz out of it, which is quite helpful.
4. The Last Mile Program (LMP) is very helpful as they have the right mentors to guide you in the correct path.
5. Course is very well organized. Covers everything right from basics, fundamentals to advanced topics.
6. Has this AI-driven automatic feedback in the course, quizzes which tells you to focus on the right areas of improvement.

Would make the product better:

1. For Indian candidates there should be an option to buy the course in INR.

I bought this course for 2 months after giving my first attempt (645) and my only motive to take the course was to improve the verbal score. And I am glad it improved by a lot. E-GMAT curriculum help me achieve my target of 675 with improving my verbal from V79 to V84. Even there Quants section is quite comprehensive and DI has lots of variety of questions which will prepare you to tackle any kind of challenges. To anyone starting fresh for GMAT or someone who is consistently hitting the same score and not improving, I would recommend folks to go with a mentor program because they can guide you with right approach to tackle and break the barrier.

Read More