GMAT Club
-
- FORUM
- Private Messages
- Question Banks
- GMAT PRACTICE TESTS
- FORUM QUIZ
- DECISION TRACKER
- EVENTS
- CHAT
- BLOG
- REWARDS
- T&C and Privacy Policy
-
- Close
Sign in with Google
Sign in with Apple
-
- Close
| All Reviews > udaypratapsingh99's Reviews |
May 12, 2019
Pros:
Overall very good for practice. These definitely help in improvement.
1) Enough in quantity(25). But here a con: verbal CATs are very few, though we need more of verbal CATs than quants.
2) Very good difficulty level((This is the best part)).
3) A Big database of Questions.
4) Good Solution and analytics.
5) Close interface to that of actual GMAT.
CONS:
1)GMAT Club tests are Computer-Based but they are not much adaptive. It means their front-end will look like a GMAT Test but the back-end adaptive algorithm is not based upon any adaptive base enough to approximate real GMAT.
2) Very few verbal tests.
3) Sectional tests do not give real test like feeling.
PS: I definitely recommend these tests to Aspirants.
December 17, 2022
Perfect in quantity & GMAT like UI | good-can be improved in accuracy of score&variety of questions
REVIEWER IDENTITY VERIFIED by post count [?]
Pros:
1) Quantity od Tests (15 in number-perfect)
2) GMAT like UI/UX (perfect - better than most others)
Cons:
1) not enough variety in questions. (for initial tests it doesn't matter but after 10 test, repeating questions on similar pattern becomes hurdle in improvement)
2) accuracy of score is not good (partly because of not having variety on question)
My take:
Better then most others - go for it and complement it with any other test series.
Alternative:
1) GMAT Club tests are probably the best and enough in quantity of quants.
2) MGMAT are tougher and not enough in number but good to complement Expert Global