Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 02:14 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 02:14
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,715
Own Kudos:
810,342
 [4]
Given Kudos: 105,795
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,715
Kudos: 810,342
 [4]
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,715
Own Kudos:
810,342
 [2]
Given Kudos: 105,795
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,715
Kudos: 810,342
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
paragw
Joined: 17 May 2024
Last visit: 16 Apr 2026
Posts: 189
Own Kudos:
193
 [2]
Given Kudos: 38
Posts: 189
Kudos: 193
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Himanshu7827
Joined: 08 Sep 2025
Last visit: 06 Feb 2026
Posts: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
SwethaReddyL
Joined: 28 Nov 2023
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 106
Own Kudos:
26
 [1]
Given Kudos: 266
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 106
Kudos: 26
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conclusion - Doctors in the 60 and older group make them far more reliable than younger doctors are
Line of Reasoning - Only 2% of doctors 60 and older make error

This is an assumption question,
I usually attempt assumption question by trying the answer choice negation method. The negation of the correct answer breaks the conclusion.

This is more of both causal relationship and comparison relationship
The assumption could be that,
1) the severity of the cases that each group take is the same
2) the no. of the cases that each group take is the same
3) error rates are measured fairly
and so, on
Option A - this focuses mainly on the younger groups. Also, the negation "The diff btwn the error rate of the docs under 30 and of those btwn 30 and 35 CANNOT be attributed to the higher level of medical experience possessed by the older doctors" - doesn't have any effect on the conclusion. Cross A
Option B - This talks about the population of the doctors, the percentage already account for it. Cross B
Option C - C would actually strengthen the argument if any? Because that would explain why they make few errors, we do not need to assume that. Cross C
Option D - This actually makes perfect sense. Like how we discussed above on reason 2. The negation - "Doctors 60 and above on an average DO treat considerably lower no. of patients per year than doctors 35 and younger do" The negation breaks the conclusion. Hold on D
Option E - This actually restates the premise - cross E

The final pick is Choice D
Bunuel
Last year, 10 percent of doctors younger than 30 and 7 percent of doctors between the ages of 30 and 35, practicing in Darrenville, made at least one avoidable error during a medical procedure. On the other hand, only 2 percent of doctors 60 and older made such an error. These findings make it clear that the advanced experience and learned propensity for caution possessed by doctors in the 60 and older group make them far more reliable than younger doctors are.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) The difference between the error rate of doctors under 30 and of those between 30 and 35 can be attributed to the higher level of medical experience possessed by the older doctors.

(B) Doctors 60 years and above do not make up a meaningfully larger fraction of physicians in Darrenville than doctors between the ages of 30 and 35 do.

(C) Doctors 60 years and above are less likely than are doctors 35 and younger to perform medical procedures under circumstances that significantly heighten the risk of errors.

(D) Doctors 60 years and above, on average, do not, treat a considerably lower number of patients per year than doctors 35 and younger do.

(E) For no age bracket is the error rate lower than it is for doctors 60 and older.
User avatar
adityamntr
Joined: 15 Jul 2023
Last visit: 21 Feb 2026
Posts: 111
Own Kudos:
81
 [1]
Given Kudos: 13
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Posts: 111
Kudos: 81
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
D. It this staement is not true -> doc >60 would treat less number of people. A alternative explaination thata could arise is that they did not treat enough patients, hence lower % error. So statement would be weakened
User avatar
linnet
Joined: 11 Dec 2025
Last visit: 22 Jan 2026
Posts: 81
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 81
Kudos: 42
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The last statement is our conclusion for the argument hence our Answer is C
User avatar
Rickooreoisb
Joined: 18 Jul 2025
Last visit: 05 Apr 2026
Posts: 157
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 575
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 9
WE:Investment Banking (Finance: Investment Banking)
Posts: 157
Kudos: 41
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I did not find any of the option correct. D seems be wrong because the question discusses on percentage and hence absolute number to be ignored. C needs to be negated for it to be correct. Hence I eliminated C and D.
User avatar
sharmayogeeta
Joined: 02 Jan 2025
Last visit: 12 Apr 2026
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Location: India
Posts: 22
Kudos: 20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(C) If younger doctor perform procedure with more likelihood of error as compared to doctors over 60, then this will not hold correct.
User avatar
vikramadityaa
Joined: 28 Jul 2025
Last visit: 23 Dec 2025
Posts: 55
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 55
Kudos: 41
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Last year, 10 percent of doctors younger than 30 and 7 percent of doctors between the ages of 30 and 35, practicing in Darrenville, made at least one avoidable error during a medical procedure. On the other hand, only 2 percent of doctors 60 and older made such an error. These findings make it clear that the advanced experience and learned propensity for caution possessed by doctors in the 60 and older group make them far more reliable than younger doctors are.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) The difference between the error rate of doctors under 30 and of those between 30 and 35 can be attributed to the higher level of medical experience possessed by the older doctors.

(B) Doctors 60 years and above do not make up a meaningfully larger fraction of physicians in Darrenville than doctors between the ages of 30 and 35 do.

(C) Doctors 60 years and above are less likely than are doctors 35 and younger to perform medical procedures under circumstances that significantly heighten the risk of errors.

(D) Doctors 60 years and above, on average, do not, treat a considerably lower number of patients per year than doctors 35 and younger do.

(E) For no age bracket is the error rate lower than it is for doctors 60 and older.



The argument is based entirely on the number of doctors, as it talks about the percentage of younger doctors (under 30, 30-35) who did a mistake is greater than that of doctors above 60. The assumption that the authors take is doctor under 30 and between 30 and 35 are larger in number in the hospital compared to doctors older than 60.
Eg: Number of doctors a) Under 30 = 10 ( 30% = 3); b) 30-35 = 10 (7% = 0.7); c) 60+ = 200 (2% = 4) - if the number of 60+ exceeds the other categories entire argument falls.
User avatar
luisdicampo
Joined: 10 Feb 2025
Last visit: 19 Apr 2026
Posts: 480
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 328
Products:
Posts: 480
Kudos: 73
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Last year, 10 percent of doctors younger than 30 and 7 percent of doctors between the ages of 30 and 35, practicing in Darrenville, made at least one avoidable error during a medical procedure. On the other hand, only 2 percent of doctors 60 and older made such an error. These findings make it clear that the advanced experience and learned propensity for caution possessed by doctors in the 60 and older group make them far more reliable than younger doctors are.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) The difference between the error rate of doctors under 30 and of those between 30 and 35 can be attributed to the higher level of medical experience possessed by the older doctors.

(B) Doctors 60 years and above do not make up a meaningfully larger fraction of physicians in Darrenville than doctors between the ages of 30 and 35 do.

(C) Doctors 60 years and above are less likely than are doctors 35 and younger to perform medical procedures under circumstances that significantly heighten the risk of errors.

(D) Doctors 60 years and above, on average, do not, treat a considerably lower number of patients per year than doctors 35 and younger do.

(E) For no age bracket is the error rate lower than it is for doctors 60 and older.
Deconstructing the Argument
Premise: 10% of doctors under 30 made at least one error. 7% of doctors aged 30-35 made at least one error. Only 2% of doctors over 60 made at least one error.
Conclusion: Doctors over 60 are more reliable than younger doctors due to experience and caution.

Identify the Assumption (Gap Analysis)
The argument uses the statistic "percentage of doctors who made at least one error" to assert "reliability."

Theory: Frequency vs. Rate.

Reliability is about the error rate per procedure. The evidence is about the error rate per person.
If a doctor performs 1,000 procedures a year, their chance of making "at least one error" is statistically much higher than a doctor who performs only 10 procedures a year, even if the busy doctor is technically more skillful (lower error rate per procedure).
To conclude that the lower percentage of erroneous doctors in the 60+ group implies higher reliability, we must assume that the 60+ group does not simply have fewer opportunities to make errors. We must assume they perform a comparable volume of work.

Analyze the Options

(A) The difference between the error rate of doctors under 30 and of those between 30 and 35...
This focuses on the comparison between the two younger groups. It is irrelevant to the main conclusion comparing the 60+ group to the younger ones.

(B) Doctors 60 years and above do not make up a meaningfully larger fraction...
The total number or fraction of doctors in the population doesn't affect the rate of error within their own group.

(C) Doctors 60 years and above are less likely than are doctors 35 and younger to perform medical procedures under circumstances that significantly heighten the risk of errors.
This touches on case difficulty. However, option (D) addresses the more fundamental statistical flaw of volume. Even with low-risk procedures, a high enough volume increases the probability of "at least one error." Furthermore, if we negate (C) (they do perform high risk procedures), it might actually strengthen the idea that they are reliable (since they have low errors despite high risk).

(D) Doctors 60 years and above, on average, do not, treat a considerably lower number of patients per year than doctors 35 and younger do. CORRECT.
Apply the Negation Test: "Doctors 60+ DO treat a considerably lower number of patients." If older doctors see very few patients (e.g., they are semi-retired), then the fact that only 2% made an error is likely due to their low exposure to risk, not their superior reliability. They simply didn't work enough to mess up. This negation shatters the argument that "experience" is the cause. Therefore, the argument depends on this assumption.

(E) For no age bracket is the error rate lower than it is for doctors 60 and older.
The argument only claims older doctors are more reliable than younger doctors. It doesn't require them to be the best in the universe (e.g., compared to 40-50 year olds).

Answer: D
User avatar
AbhishekP220108
Joined: 04 Aug 2024
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 494
Own Kudos:
209
 [1]
Given Kudos: 135
GMAT Focus 1: 555 Q81 V78 DI74
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 555 Q81 V78 DI74
Posts: 494
Kudos: 209
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO The correct answer is (D).

Here is the breakdown of the logic, presented as a straightforward discussion.

The Argument's Flaw: The "At Least One" Trap

The argument compares two groups based on a specific metric: "Did you make at least one error this year?"

​Young Doctors: 10% said "Yes."

Old Doctors: 2% said "Yes."
​Conclusion: Old doctors are more skilled/cautious/reliable.

​The Problem: This metric is completely dependent on Volume (how much they work).

​Imagine a coin toss where "Heads" is an error.
​The Young Doctor (The Workhorse): Flips the coin 1,000 times a year. It is statistically almost certain they will get "Heads" at least once. They get a "Yes" on the error survey.

The Semi-Retired Doctor (The Old Doctor): Flips the coin 1 time a year. They likely get "Tails." They get a "No" on the error survey.

Does the "No" mean the Old Doctor is better at flipping?
No. It just means they flipped fewer times.
For the author to claim the Old Doctors are better, they must assume the Old Doctors aren't just "flipping the coin" fewer times.

Why (D) is the Essential Assumption
​(D) Doctors 60 years and above, on average, do not, treat a considerably lower number of patients per year than doctors 35 and younger do.

The Negation Test:
Let's turn this statement upside down.
​Negation: "Doctors 60+ DO treat a considerably lower number of patients than younger doctors."
​Scenario: The 60+ doctors are semi-retired and see 1 patient a week. The young doctors are residents seeing 50 patients a day.

The Result: If this is true, the lower error rate is explained by laziness/inactivity, not by skill/caution. The conclusion that they are "more reliable" is destroyed.

Since the argument dies if we negate (D), hence (D) is the necessary assumption.

​lets see Why the others are incorrect

(A) Difference between the two
Lyoung groups: The argument is about proving the Old doctors are superior to the Young ones. Explaining the nuance between "Under 30" and "30-35" is a side detail. It doesn't help prove the Old doctors are reliable.

(B) Population Size: This talks about the total number of doctors in the city. But the evidence is already in percentages (rates).
​Example: If 10% of 1,000 young doctors make errors, and 2% of 10 old doctors make errors, we can still compare the 10% to the 2%. We don't need the groups to be the same size to compare their failure rates.

(C) Risk/Difficulty: This implies that Old doctors might avoid high-risk surgeries.
​Watch out: If we assume Old doctors avoid high-risk surgeries, we are giving an alternative explanation for their low error rate (they do easy work). If they only do easy work, it actually weakens the claim that they have superior skill. A necessary assumption usually defends the argument, not weakens it.

(E) No age bracket is lower: The argument only concludes that Old Doctors are better than Young Doctors. We don't need to assume Old Doctors are the best in the entire universe (e.g., better than 45-year-olds). We just need them to be better than the 30-year-olds.


Bunuel
Last year, 10 percent of doctors younger than 30 and 7 percent of doctors between the ages of 30 and 35, practicing in Darrenville, made at least one avoidable error during a medical procedure. On the other hand, only 2 percent of doctors 60 and older made such an error. These findings make it clear that the advanced experience and learned propensity for caution possessed by doctors in the 60 and older group make them far more reliable than younger doctors are.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) The difference between the error rate of doctors under 30 and of those between 30 and 35 can be attributed to the higher level of medical experience possessed by the older doctors.

(B) Doctors 60 years and above do not make up a meaningfully larger fraction of physicians in Darrenville than doctors between the ages of 30 and 35 do.

(C) Doctors 60 years and above are less likely than are doctors 35 and younger to perform medical procedures under circumstances that significantly heighten the risk of errors.

(D) Doctors 60 years and above, on average, do not, treat a considerably lower number of patients per year than doctors 35 and younger do.

(E) For no age bracket is the error rate lower than it is for doctors 60 and older.
User avatar
HemanthN01
Joined: 22 Dec 2024
Last visit: 26 Feb 2026
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
14
 [1]
Given Kudos: 8
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GPA: 4.0
WE:Information Technology (Technology)
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Last year, 10 percent of doctors younger than 30 and 7 percent of doctors between the ages of 30 and 35, practicing in Darrenville, made at least one avoidable error during a medical procedure. On the other hand, only 2 percent of doctors 60 and older made such an error. These findings make it clear that the advanced experience and learned propensity for caution possessed by doctors in the 60 and older group make them far more reliable than younger doctors are.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) The difference between the error rate of doctors under 30 and of those between 30 and 35 can be attributed to the higher level of medical experience possessed by the older doctors.

(B) Doctors 60 years and above do not make up a meaningfully larger fraction of physicians in Darrenville than doctors between the ages of 30 and 35 do.

(C) Doctors 60 years and above are less likely than are doctors 35 and younger to perform medical procedures under circumstances that significantly heighten the risk of errors.

(D) Doctors 60 years and above, on average, do not, treat a considerably lower number of patients per year than doctors 35 and younger do.

(E) For no age bracket is the error rate lower than it is for doctors 60 and older.
What we can infer from the passage is that, more the experience less there are chances for making error. So, for this statement to become true we should assume that same number of patients were taken into consideration across all age groups while doing this survey, because if different number of patients percentage are considered then this survey would be meaningless, so it will be option D.
User avatar
ineius
Joined: 14 Oct 2025
Last visit: 11 Jan 2026
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
3
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 14
Kudos: 3
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
the answer is option d as it assumes that doctors over the age of 60 as well as the doctors in the age bracket of 30-35 examine the same number of patients, if not less or more, which would have otherwise weakened the argument
avatar
ManifestDreamMBA
Joined: 17 Sep 2024
Last visit: 21 Feb 2026
Posts: 1,387
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 243
Posts: 1,387
Kudos: 897
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Based on the error % within the groups, the argument labels the 60+ doctor group reliable

A - Conclusion is about 60+ group, details about <30 and 30-35 doesn't help
B - We are comparing % and hence the doctor age group % doesn't matter
C - Doctors are less likely to perform procedures under circumstances with high risks, which reflects on their reliability (propensity of caution, avoiding avoidable errors)
If we negate this it makes 60+ group equal or more likely to perform under high risk circumstances, which cannot be termed as reliable and breaks the argument
D - Error % is a function of physicians and not number of procedures, hence this is irrelevant
E - argument doesn't say this group is the best, it's just compares 60+ group against <30 and 30-35 groups

Bunuel
Last year, 10 percent of doctors younger than 30 and 7 percent of doctors between the ages of 30 and 35, practicing in Darrenville, made at least one avoidable error during a medical procedure. On the other hand, only 2 percent of doctors 60 and older made such an error. These findings make it clear that the advanced experience and learned propensity for caution possessed by doctors in the 60 and older group make them far more reliable than younger doctors are.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) The difference between the error rate of doctors under 30 and of those between 30 and 35 can be attributed to the higher level of medical experience possessed by the older doctors.

(B) Doctors 60 years and above do not make up a meaningfully larger fraction of physicians in Darrenville than doctors between the ages of 30 and 35 do.

(C) Doctors 60 years and above are less likely than are doctors 35 and younger to perform medical procedures under circumstances that significantly heighten the risk of errors.

(D) Doctors 60 years and above, on average, do not, treat a considerably lower number of patients per year than doctors 35 and younger do.

(E) For no age bracket is the error rate lower than it is for doctors 60 and older.
User avatar
sitrem
Joined: 19 Nov 2025
Last visit: 24 Feb 2026
Posts: 91
Own Kudos:
84
 [1]
Given Kudos: 238
Posts: 91
Kudos: 84
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. is not an assumption
B. numbers do not affect percentages
C. is not an assumption, but something that weakens the argument (if older doctors choose less risky cases/operate under less risky situations, it's not becuase of their experience and age that the rate is lower than that of younger doctors.
E. the argument does not state that 60+ year old doctors have the lowest rate, only that they have a lower rate than young doctors.

D. the arguments depends on this assumption, that old and young doctors have a similar number of patients (therefore a similar number of opportunities to make mistakes), if old doctors had significantly fewer patients, the lower rate of mistakes would not be because of their experience but because of a decreased amount of work (less opportunities to make mistakes)
User avatar
Ayeka
Joined: 26 May 2024
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 528
Own Kudos:
402
 [1]
Given Kudos: 158
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q82 V83 DI80
GPA: 4.2
Schools: ISB
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q82 V83 DI80
Posts: 528
Kudos: 402
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. Only compares younger groups.......no
B. The data is based on percentages and not on size of age groups......irrelevant
C. 60+ doctors are less likely than 35 to perform medical procedures that significantly heighten the risk of errors.
Negation of this choice strengthens the conclusion......No
D. 60+ doctors do not treat considerably lower number of patients per year than 35 & younger do.
Negation- 60+ doctors treat considerably fewer patients per year than 35& younger.....then their low error rate might be because they have fewer chances of making errors....this undermines the conclusion.....possible answer

D
User avatar
chasing725
Joined: 22 Jun 2025
Last visit: 13 Jan 2026
Posts: 176
Own Kudos:
173
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Location: United States (OR)
Schools: Stanford
Schools: Stanford
Posts: 176
Kudos: 173
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Last year, 10 percent of doctors younger than 30 and 7 percent of doctors between the ages of 30 and 35, practicing in Darrenville, made at least one avoidable error during a medical procedure. On the other hand, only 2 percent of doctors 60 and older made such an error. These findings make it clear that the advanced experience and learned propensity for caution possessed by doctors in the 60 and older group make them far more reliable than younger doctors are.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) The difference between the error rate of doctors under 30 and of those between 30 and 35 can be attributed to the higher level of medical experience possessed by the older doctors.

(B) Doctors 60 years and above do not make up a meaningfully larger fraction of physicians in Darrenville than doctors between the ages of 30 and 35 do.

(C) Doctors 60 years and above are less likely than are doctors 35 and younger to perform medical procedures under circumstances that significantly heighten the risk of errors.

(D) Doctors 60 years and above, on average, do not, treat a considerably lower number of patients per year than doctors 35 and younger do.

(E) For no age bracket is the error rate lower than it is for doctors 60 and older.
The passage in its conclusion assumes that everything is equal which means the number of patients is almost the same, the type of diseases that they treat is the same etc.

A:Incorrect - This is not an assumption. The passage compares doctors who are greater than 60 to the younger doctors

B: Incorrect - This strengthens the conclusion, and is not an assumption. Eliminate.

C: Incorrect - This is a weakener but not an assumption. If if the risk of error is a bit low, we can still conclude. Eliminate.

D: Correct - If the number is different the percentages don't tell us anything. Hence this is an assumption to arrive that everything else is same.

E: Incorrect - This is not the right assumption. Elimiante

Option D
User avatar
Kinshook
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 5,985
Own Kudos:
5,855
 [1]
Given Kudos: 163
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Products:
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
Posts: 5,985
Kudos: 5,855
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Age of doctorsPercentage of doctors made at least one avoidable error
<30 years10%
30 -35 years7%
> 60 years2%

Conclusion: - Advanced experience and learned propensity for caution possessed by doctors > 60 years made them more reliable than younger doctors are.

Assumption ?

If assumption is negated, the conclusion falls apart.

A. The conclusion is about doctors above 60 years of age. Incorrect
B. Doctors > 60 years form larger fraction than those 30-35 years. Supports the argument. The argument does not fall apart. Incorrect
C. Doctors > 60 years more likely than doctors < 30 years to perform medical procedures -> heighten the risk for errors.
D. Doctors > 50 years treat considerably lower number of patients than <35 years - > Less likely to make at least one avoidable error. Assumption negated - > Conclusion falls apart. Correct
E. The argument is not concerned with other age groups. Incorrect

IMO D
User avatar
gchandana
Joined: 16 May 2024
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 191
Own Kudos:
139
 [1]
Given Kudos: 170
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 191
Kudos: 139
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The reasoning here is that advanced experience and learned propensity cause the doctors in the 60 and older group to be more reliable.

A. This comparison is not relevant, as we are comparing those 35 and younger with those 60 and older.
B. We are already talking about percentages in the argument. This would matter if it were actual numbers.
C. This weakens the argument by giving out another reason for the observations.
D. This is the assumption. The argument breaks if we negate this.
E. We don't need to assume this, nor does it have to be true, as our comparison is between 35 and younger and 60 and older.

Option D.
Bunuel
Last year, 10 percent of doctors younger than 30 and 7 percent of doctors between the ages of 30 and 35, practicing in Darrenville, made at least one avoidable error during a medical procedure. On the other hand, only 2 percent of doctors 60 and older made such an error. These findings make it clear that the advanced experience and learned propensity for caution possessed by doctors in the 60 and older group make them far more reliable than younger doctors are.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) The difference between the error rate of doctors under 30 and of those between 30 and 35 can be attributed to the higher level of medical experience possessed by the older doctors.

(B) Doctors 60 years and above do not make up a meaningfully larger fraction of physicians in Darrenville than doctors between the ages of 30 and 35 do.

(C) Doctors 60 years and above are less likely than are doctors 35 and younger to perform medical procedures under circumstances that significantly heighten the risk of errors.

(D) Doctors 60 years and above, on average, do not, treat a considerably lower number of patients per year than doctors 35 and younger do.

(E) For no age bracket is the error rate lower than it is for doctors 60 and older.
 1   2   3   4   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
494 posts
358 posts