Bunuel
12 Days of Christmas 🎅 GMAT Competition with Lots of Questions & FunAt an office Christmas party, where at least one person likes eggnog and at least one likes cocoa, is the number of people who like eggnog at least three times the number of those who like cocoa?
(1) The number of attendees who neither like eggnog nor cocoa is twice the number of those who like eggnog.
(2) The number of attendees who like either eggnog or cocoa, or both, is four times the number of those who like cocoa.
Your analysis is correct.
Statement 1 is insufficient to determine whether the number of people who like eggnog is at least three times the number of those who like cocoa. It only provides information about the relationship between those who like neither drink and those who like eggnog, but it doesn't give any direct comparison between eggnog and cocoa preferences.
Statement 2 is sufficient to determine that the number of people who like eggnog is at least three times the number of those who like cocoa. Here's a breakdown of the logic:
Equation from Statement 2: a + b + c = 4(b + c)
Simplifying: a = 3(b + c)
Adding b to both sides: a + b = 3(b + c) + b
Interpretation:
a + b represents the total number of people who like eggnog (either only eggnog or both drinks).
b + c represents the total number of people who like cocoa (either only cocoa or both drinks).
Conclusion: The equation a + b = 3(b + c) + b shows that the number of people who like eggnog (a + b) is at least three times the number of people who like cocoa (b + c), with the possibility of being even more due to the additional "b" term.
Therefore, the answer is B: Statement 2 alone is sufficient.
IMO B