Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 1912:30 PM EST
-01:30 PM EST
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2001:30 PM EST
-02:30 PM IST
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2407:00 PM PST
-08:00 PM PST
Full-length FE mock with insightful analytics, weakness diagnosis, and video explanations!
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
ChiranjeevSingh
Expert
Tutor
Expert reply
13 Sep 2022, 07:46
Kudos
Bookmarks
Some Notes on Pronouns
12 Frequently misunderstood rules about Pronouns
12 Frequently misunderstood rules about Pronouns
Does Who always refer to the subject and Whom always refer to the object?+
NO.
Who can refer to and thus modify ANY noun in a sentence (of course, within the constraints of the rules of noun modifiers), and Whom can also refer to and thus modify ANY noun in a sentence (within the constraints of the rules of noun modifiers).
The difference between Who and Whom lies
- not in which nouns they can modify
- but in what Who and Whom do within their own clauses
The difference is that
- Who can be the subject or the object of its own clause
- Whom can only be the object of its own clause
For example:
Ram, who is a cricketer, likes Shyam.
- 1. This sentence is correct
2. Ram is the subject
3. Who refers to the subject
4. Who acts as a subject in its clause “who is a cricketer”
Ram likes Shyam, who is a cricketer.
- 1. This sentence is correct
2. Shyam is the object
3. Who refers to the object
4. Who acts as a subject in its clause “who is a cricketer”
Ram likes Shyam, whom is a cricketer.
- 1. This sentence is Incorrect.
2. Shyam is the object
3. Whom refers to the object
4. Whom acts as a subject in its clause “whom is a cricketer”. This usage is NOT ALLOWED. Thus, the sentence is incorrect.
Ram likes Shyam, whom many admire.
- 1. This sentence is correct.
2. Shyam is the object.
3. Whom refers to the object.
4. Whom acts as an object in its clause “whom many admire” (Subject: many; Verb: admire; Object: Whom [Shyam])
Ram, whom many admire, likes Shyam
- This sentence is correct.
- Ram is the subject
- Whom refers to the subject.
- Whom acts as an object in its clause “whom many admire” (Subject: many; Verb: admire; Object: Whom [Ram])
Ram, who many admire, likes Shyam.
- 1. This sentence is correct.
2. Ram is the subject
3. Who refers to the subject.
4. Who acts as an object in its clause “who many admire” (Subject: many; Verb: admire; Object: Who [Ram])..
Grammatically, Whom is an object form of Who and thus always acts as an object. ho is more flexible – Who can act as a subject or an object in its clause. However, there is one way Who cannot be used, i.e., as an object of the preposition when the preposition appears right before Who.
For example:
Indian cricketers, one of whom is a billionaire, are expected to arrive shortly.
Here, “whom” is the correct pronoun since we need an object of the preposition “of”. The following sentence is incorrect since Who cannot act as an object of a preposition.
Indian cricketers, one of who is a billionaire, are expected to arrive shortly.
On the other hand, if we separate Who from the preposition and put the preposition at the end of the clause, we can have Who as even the object of a preposition. For example:
I recently met George’s brother, who I went to school with.
The meaning of the Who-clause is: I went to school with George’s brother. (I – subject; went – verb; George’s brother – object of the preposition ‘with’)
Since Who refers to George’s brother and ,meaning-wise, George’s brother is the object of the preposition ‘with’, Who acts as an object of the preposition ‘with’ in its clause.
This use is CORRECT. Who can act as an object of the preposition as long as the preposition doesn’t appear before Who.
Bonus Info: Who and Whom can NEVER create an Independent Clause; they always create a Dependant Clause. Of course, the dependent clause could be a part of some Independent Clause.
You can read more about the relative pronouns on the following links:
You can add value to this post by sharing official questions relevant to this topic in the comments 🙂
How to identify the placeholder pronoun "It"?+
“It” can act as a regular pronoun (i.e., it refers to a noun) and can also act as a placeholder pronoun.
What do we mean by the term “placeholder pronoun”?
The term refers to a pronoun (“It”) that doesn’t refer to a noun and just holds a place in a sentence. For example:
- It is nice that you are wearing jeans.
Is “it” referring to anything in the above sentence?
No. “It” is just holding the place of a noun – in the above sentence, “it” is holding the place of the subject.
Let’s look at a couple of more sentences:
- 1. It is safe for you to go outside.
2. I want to make it clear that I was not a part of this crime.
In both the sentences above, “it” acts as a placeholder pronoun. “it” doesn’t refer to any noun. “It” holds the place of the subject in the first sentence and holds the place of the object in the second sentence.
I have seen that the placeholder “It” is commonly used when infinitives or that-clauses are the subject (or the object) of a clause.
For example:
- It is nice that you are wearing jeans.
What do you think is nice per the above sentence?
Answer: That you are wearing jeans.
Right?
Thus, meaning-wise, the that-clause is the subject. The above sentence is equivalent to the following sentence:
- That you are wearing jeans is nice.
Both these sentences mean the same and are grammatically correct. However, the first sentence with the placeholder “it” is more common nowadays.
The sentence “It is nice that you are wearing jeans” is an example of a sentence in which “it” acts as a placeholder and pushes the that-clause to the latter part of the sentence.
The same idea applies to infinitives.
- It is safe for you to go outside.
What do you think is safe per the above sentence?
Answer: To go outside.
Right?
Thus, meaning-wise, the infinitive is the subject. Rather, the above sentence is equivalent to the following sentence:
To go outside is safe for you.
Both these sentences mean the same and are grammatically correct. However, the first sentence with the placeholder “it” is more common nowadays.
The sentence “It is safe for you to go outside” is an example of a sentence in which “it” acts as a placeholder and pushes the infinitive to the latter part of the sentence.
Similarly, in the below sentence, the placeholder “it” pushes the that-clause (which is meaning-wise the object of “make”) to the latter part of the sentence.
- I want to make it clear that I was not a part of this crime.
Here are a few more sentences with the placeholder “it” and their equivalent sentences without the placeholder “it”.
- 1. It is very difficult to tell the male and female apart in blue-winged warblers.
Equivalent Sentence: To tell the male and female apart in blue-winged warblers is very difficult.
2. It is perhaps surprising that the government decided to pass the bill.
Equivalent Sentence: That the government decided to pass the bill is perhaps surprising.
3. It is not decided yet whether I’ll visit the US in November.
Equivalent Sentence: Whether I’ll visit the US in November is not decided yet.
Are the above the only ways in which the placeholder “It” is used?
I don’t think so. There are other ways too. However, the above ways are some common ways in which the placeholder “It” is used.
Is there any difference between "one of them is blind" and "one of whom is blind"?+
“One of them is blind” is an Independent Clause (IC) while “one of whom is blind” is a Dependent Clause (DC).
Why is the first an IC while the second is a DC?
Because ‘them’ is an object form of ‘they’ and ‘whom’ is an object form of ‘who’.
Identify whether the following clauses are independent or dependent.
- 1. They are blind
2. Who are blind
The first one is an IC while the second is a DC.
Thus, their corresponding object forms also lead to IC and DC respectively.
The following are ICs:
- 1. They are blind
2. One of them is blind
3. Some of them are blind
4. Many of them are blind
The following are DCs:
- 1. Who are blind
2. One of whom is blind
3. Some of whom are blind
4. Many of whom are blind
ICs cannot be modifiers; DCs can be modifiers. Thus, if you need to modify a noun, you can use the “one of whom” construction to create a clause modifier.
For example:
- My friends, all of whom are nice, will visit me today.
- My friends, all of them are nice, will visit me today.
(Incorrect. “all of them are nice” is an IC and thus cannot modify “my friends”; Grammar doesn’t allow an IC within double commas.)
Can "their" act as a subject or an object in a sentence?+
No.
Since “their” cannot act as a noun.
“their” is a possessive form of “they” and thus can act only as an adjective.
Can “his” act as a noun?
No. “his” can act only as an adjective just like “their”.
Similarly, “whose” can act only as an adjective and not as a noun.
Can "that" refer to plural nouns?+
“That” can refer to plural nouns ONLY when “that clause” acts as a modifier to the plural noun. For example, the following sentence is correct.
- The apples that are rotten need to be thrown out.
In the above sentence, “that” refers to “apples” and is correctly used since “that” can refer to plural nouns when the “that clause” is modifying the plural noun.
However, when “that” is used not as a modifier but as a regular pronoun, “that” cannot refer to a plural noun; in such cases, “that” can refer to only singular nouns; “those” needs to be used to refer to plural nouns in such cases.
- 1. My nose is longer than that of Ram. (Correct. “that” refers to a singular “nose”)
2. My legs are longer than that of Ram. (Incorrect. “that” refers to plural “legs” – this is not allowed grammatically)
3. My legs are longer than those of Ram. (Correct. “those” refers to a plural “legs”)
4. My nose is longer than those of Ram. (Incorrect. “those” refers to singular “nose” – this is not allowed grammatically)
Can "they" refer to non-humans?+
Yes, “they” can refer to animals and things too. For example, the following sentences are correct:
- 1. While apples are good for health, they are very expensive. (“they” refers to ‘apples’ – this is correct usage)
2. Since dogs have emotions, they should be treated with respect. (“they” refers to ‘dogs’ – this is correct usage)
3. While many people condemn the killings, they don’t dare to support the cause publicly. (“they” refers to ‘people’ – this is correct usage)
Can "whose" refer to non-humans?+
Yes, “whose” can refer to animals and things too. For example, the following sentences are correct:
- 1. People whose wisdom grows with time remain happy. (“whose” refers to ‘people’ – this is correct usage)
2. Dogs whose tails are shorter than 6 inches are more violent than other dogs. (“whose” refers to ‘dogs’ – this is correct usage)
3. The computers whose keyboards are poorly designed do not sell well. (“whose” refers to ‘computers’ – this is correct usage)
Can "whose" refer to only singular nouns?+
No. “whose” can refer to and modify both singular and plural nouns. For example, both below sentences are correct.
- 1. A computer whose keyboard is poorly designed does not sell easily. (“whose” refers to ‘computer’ – this is correct usage)
2. The computers whose keyboards are poorly designed do not sell well. (“whose” refers to ‘computers’ – this is correct usage)
Can "they" and "it" refer only to nouns that are close by?+
No. “they”, “it”, and other pronouns such as “he” and “she” can refer to even faraway nouns, including nouns in another independent clause. e-GMAT has debunked common myths around pronouns in this excellent article.
Can "which" and "that" refer to nouns that are far?+
Depends.
First of all, in this discussion, I want to restrict myself to the use of “that” in which “that clause” acts as modifier. (“that” can act as a pronoun without being a part of a “that clause” – its usage is different in this case)
The following pronouns can form clauses that act as modifiers to nouns:
- 1. that
2. which
3. who
4. whom
5. whose
The rule for every noun modifier is the same: a noun modifier can modifier the preceding noun or jump over other noun modifiers. A noun-modifier CANNOT jump over a verb or a modifier that is not a noun modifier.
Since all of the pronouns, when they modify a noun, refer to the same noun, the rule for their reference is the same as above: they can refer to the preceding noun or jump over other noun modifiers. They cannot refer to nouns that are separated from these pronouns with a verb or a modifier that is not a noun modifier.
Now, coming to the question asked:
Can “which” and “that” refer to nouns that are far?
These pronouns, when acting as modifiers, can refer to faraway nouns as long as they are separated only by noun modifiers from the noun they want to refer to. If they are separated from the noun with a verb or some verb modifier, they cannot refer to that noun.
Can we have independent clauses start with pronouns?+
Yes.
Only relative pronouns such as the following make the clauses dependent. Regular pronouns such as given below don’t make the clauses dependent.
Relative Pronouns: who, whom, whose, where, when, why, that, which and how.
Regular pronouns:
- 1. He, his, him
2. She, her
3. You, your, yours
4. I, me, mine
5. It, its
6. They, them, their
7. We, us, our
8. That (can be used as a regular pronoun also)
What is the difference between "their" and "whose"?+
“their” and “whose” both are possessive pronouns – they act as adjectives and do not act as nouns in a sentence. Please refer to the answer to the question “Can their act as a subject or an object in a sentence?” for more details.
“their” is a possesive form of “they” and “whose” is a possessive form of “who”.
Since a clause starting with “they” is an Independent Clause (IC) and a clause starting with “who” is a Dependent Clause (DC), a clause starting with “their” is an IC and a clause starting with “whose” is a DC. Reading the answer to the question above “Is there any difference between ‘one of them is blind’ and ‘one of whom is blind’?” will be helpful.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
