GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 16 Jun 2019, 01:56

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

5 Strategies that GMAT uses to distort meaning

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

 
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
P
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2852
5 Strategies that GMAT uses to distort meaning  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 25 Jul 2018, 06:34
63
1
92
Added final Version (4.0) at the end of this post- Payal

5 STRATEGIES THAT GMAT USES TO DISTORT MEANING

A lot of you are re-taking the GMAT in December and have somewhat limited experience on how to deal with the “recent” meaning based SC questions in which the answer choices may contain more than one grammatically correct answer choice. In this case, the student is often confused as to how to select the correct answer choice. This post is designed to address the same. Read through the post to understand

    1. 5 Strategies that GMAC uses to distort the intended logical meaning of the sentence in a “grammatically correct” answer choice.
    2. A process to approach SC questions to answer such questions successfully
    3. Official examples and exercise questions for practice

Note, in addition to this article, we also have a full (audio-visual) concept available free of charge to all registered users. I recommend you also review that.

HOW IS THIS ARTICLE ORGANIZED

My initial forum post today will summarize the 5 strategies and describe the first strategy – placement of modifiers - in detail. The second strategy will be discussed on 9th December and so on. Those who want to be notified as soon as some exercise problem is posted can follow me on the forum.



THE 5 STRATEGIES GMAC USES TO DISTORT MEANING

GMAT Sentence Correction questions test the test taker on how effectively he/she can express the idea or relationship using correct expression conforming to the rules of standard written English. Many times an answer choice may be grammatically correct but may not be the correct choice because it distorts the intended logical meaning of the original sentence. The table below provides a quick summary on strategies that GMAC deploys to achieve the same.

Image


STRATEGY 1 - CHANGE PLACEMENT OF MODIFIERS


How does GMAC use this strategy: Modifiers provide additional or descriptive information about another entity in the sentence. So if these modifiers are placed at different locations in the sentence, the meaning of the sentence changes. This is how GMAC may introduce such meaning based errors. In these cases, both the placements result in logical meaning but only one is correct and that is determined by what the intended meaning of the sentence is.

Lets take a simple example below:

Image


So here is the scene that I picture. Cat is running after the rat. Cat has black stripes. Now lets check this sentence below.

Image

Now the scene that I picture is – cat is running after the rat. The rat has black stripes. So per this sentence, I no longer have any information about the stripes on the cat. But I have information about the stripes on the rat.

So simply by placing “with black stripes” differently, the meaning communicated by the sentence changes.
This is exactly how GMAT may introduce a difference in meaning

Image


OFFICIAL QUESTION 1 – VERBAL REVIEW 2 – Q#37

Now lets take an official question:

Some buildings that were destroyed and heavily damaged in the earthquake last year were constructed in violation of the city's building code.

    A. Some buildings that were destroyed and heavily damaged in the earthquake last year were
    B. Some buildings that were destroyed or heavily damaged in the earthquake last year had been
    C. Some buildings that the earthquake destroyed and heavily damaged last year have been
    D. Last year the earthquake destroyed or heavily damaged some buildings that have been
    E. Last year some of the buildings that were destroyed or heavily damaged in the earthquake had been

Intended meaning from Choice A: The intended meaning of the sentence from choice A can be inferred as follows:
1. Some buildings had been destroyed in the earthquake last year.
2. (Prior to the destruction) These buildings were constructed in violation of the city's building code

Image

Note that this sentence has two verbs and based on where “last year” is placed, it can modify either of the two verbs.
Notice that choice A is incorrect since it uses the simple past – were constructed. The correct verb should be “had been constructed” to illustrate correct sequencing with respect to “were destroyed” to show that the buildings were constructed prior to the destruction.

Correct: Choice B corrects this error and is the correct choice.

Grammatically Correct but Incorrect choice (E)– Notice how in choice E the test takers have cleverly moved “last year” in the clause that with SV pair - “some of buildings had been constructed” such that it now describes when some of these buildings were constructed. It no longer describes the timing of the earthquakes.

Image

The intended meaning communicated by Choice E is the following:
1. Some of the buildings had been constructed in violation of city’s building code last year.
2. These buildings were destroyed in the earthquake.
Note that in choice E we now know that the buildings were constructed last year. This is the information that we did not have in choice A. Thus, the meaning communicated by this choice is certainly different from the meaning communicated by choice A. Hence, while choice E is grammatically correct, it changes the logical intended meaning and is not the correct choice.

PS: Access our free concepts on sentence structure if you want to know how to break a compound sentence into simple sentences. Just register at e-gmat.com

OFFICIAL QUESTION 2 – OG 12 – Q#112

Now let’s take another official question. This time from OG 12.

Gall's hypothesis of there being different mental functions localized in different parts of the brain is widely accepted today.

    A. of there being different mental functions localized in different parts of the brain is widely accepted today
    B. of different mental functions that are localized in different parts of the brain is widely accepted today
    C. that different mental functions are localized in different parts of the brain is widely accepted today
    D. which is that there are different mental functions localized in different parts of the brain is widely accepted today
    E. which is widely accepted today is that there are different mental functions localized in different parts of the brain

Intended meaning from Choice A: The sentence is written in an awkward manner but we can certainly infer the intended meaning.
- A specific hypothesis of Gall is widely accepted today.
- What is the hypothesis? Per this hypothesis - different mental functions are localized in different parts of the brain.
Notice that choice A communicates precisely what the hypothesis is.

Error in the original choice: Choice A is not the correct choice since it is not written in concise manner. The expression “of there being” is very wordy.
Choice C corrects this error and is the correct choice.

Image

Grammatically Correct but Incorrect choice B: Notice how the test makers have moved the descriptive “that” modifier here. Also, the information presented by “that modifier” has also been changed to make logical sense in the changed context. The change in meaning in choice B happens because of placement and wording of “that” modifier. Instead of now stating the hypothesis, now “that” modifier talks about the mental functions. The meaning communicated by choice B is as follows:

    • Gall has certain hypothesis about different mental functions.
    • This hypothesis is widely accepted today.
    • These different mental functions are localized in different parts of the brain
    • Notice carefully that per this choice we do not know precisely what the hypothesis is. All we know is that some hypothesis of different mental functions is widely accepted and we know where the different mental functions are located.

Image

Image



HOW TO EVALUATE CHOICES THAT CHANGE THE MEANING?

1. Understand the logical meaning of the original choice. (note placement of modifiers)
2. Look for the answer choice that best communicates the same meaning in un-ambiguous and grammatically correct manner.
3. Ignore choices that may be grammatically correct but change the meaning.


PRACTICE PROBLEMS

e-GMAT course has 33 practice problems. e-GMAT customers can see the list by clicking the link below.

http://e-gmat.com/blogs/?p=745

We have also posted 2 new problems at the links below. Try them out.


Attachments

File comment: Final document summarizing all strategies and exercises.
5 Strategies that GMAT uses to distort Meaning - V4.0.pdf [1.1 MiB]
Downloaded 4824 times

To download please login or register as a user

5 Strategies that GMAT uses to distort Meaning - V3.0.pdf [1.01 MiB]
Downloaded 2479 times

To download please login or register as a user


_________________

Originally posted by egmat on 07 Dec 2011, 10:32.
Last edited by egmat on 25 Jul 2018, 06:34, edited 10 times in total.
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
P
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2852
Re: 5 Strategies that GMAT uses to distort meaning  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 09 Dec 2011, 12:02
24
4
STRATEGY 2 - USE OF MODIFIERS

How does GMAC use this strategy: There are a finite number of commonly used modifiers. These modifiers typically play well-defined role. You may find below the list of modifiers and what they typically modify. e-GMAT customers may view the concept file “Types of Modifiers” to find more details on this topic.

Image

Lets take a simple example below:
Image

So here is the scene that I picture. Cat is swift. It caught the rat. Now lets check this sentence below.

Image

Now the scene that I picture is – cat swiftly grabbed the rat. So per this sentence, I no longer know whether the cat is generally swift or not. But I do know that the cat acted swiftly and caught the rat.

So changing the modifier from “adjective” to “adverb” leads to change in the meaning communicated by the sentence. This is exactly how GMAT may introduce a difference in meaning.

OFFICIAL QUESTION 1 – OG12 – Q#126

Now lets take an official question:

The use of lie detectors is based on the assumption that lying produces emotional reactions in an individual that, in turn, create unconscious physiological responses.
    A. that, in turn, create unconscious physiological responses
    B. that create unconscious physiological responses in turn
    C. creating, in turn, unconscious physiological responses
    D. to create, in turn, physiological responses that are unconscious
    E. who creates unconscious physiological responses in turn

Intended meaning from Choice A: The intended meaning of the sentence from choice A can be inferred as follows:
1. Use of lie detectors is based on a certain assumption. Here is the assumption
2. Lying produces emotional reactions in an individual
3. These emotional reactions then create unconscious physiological responses.

Image

Note that “that clause” in this sentence clearly modifies – emotional reactions. Yes, typically relative pronoun modifiers modify the closest noun. However, they can also modify slightly far away noun when this noun is the head of the noun phrase and when such modification makes sense. E-GMAT customers can find detailed description of this concept in the concept file – Modifiers – Relative Pronouns. Also, I cover this topic in excruciating detail in one of the live sessions in the Verbal Live Complete.
This choice is absolutely correct. There are no grammatical and meaning based errors in this sentence.

Grammatically Correct but Incorrect choice (E)– – Notice how in choice E the test makers have changed the modifier from “that clause” to “who clause”. See, “who” modifiers cannot modify things. They can only modify people. So by changing ‘thing’ modifying modifier to ‘person’ modifying modifier, now automatically the entity being modified changes to “individual”. Now the modifier no longer modifies “emotional reactions”. This changes the meaning. This results in different yet still logical meaning.

Image

The intended meaning communicated by Choice E is the following:
1. Use of lie detectors is based on a certain assumption. Here is the assumption:
2. Lying produces emotional reactions in an individual
3. The individual then creates unconscious physiological responses.

Note that without subject matter knowledge, the above cause and effect sequence appears to be logical. Lying produces certain reactions in the individual and then the individual unknowingly creates certain type of responses.

Thus, the meaning communicated by this choice is certainly different from the meaning communicated by choice A. Hence, while choice E is grammatically correct, it changes the logical intended meaning and is not the correct choice.

OFFICIAL QUESTION 2 – OG Verbal Review 2 - Q#108

Now let’s take another official question.

Sound can travel through water for enormous distances, prevented from dissipating its acoustic energy as a result of boundaries in the ocean created by water layers of different temperatures and densities.
    A. prevented from dissipating its acoustic energy as a result of
    B. prevented from having its acoustic energy dissipated by
    C. its acoustic energy prevented from dissipating by
    D. its acoustic energy prevented from being dissipated as a result of
    E. preventing its acoustic energy from dissipating by

Intended meaning from Choice A: The sentence is written in an awkward manner but we can certainly infer the intended meaning.
1. Sound can travel through water for long distances.
2. The acoustic energy of sound is prevented from dissipating because of the boundaries in the ocean. These boundaries are created by water layers of different temperatures and densities.

Now it is logical to say that because of statement 2, statement 1 happens. That is because the acoustic energy of sound is not dissipated easily, sound can travel through water for long distances. At this point you can picture in your mind that these two facts can be connected in multiple ways:
1. Use connectors that state reason such as because, since.
2. Use modifier that extends the thought of preceding clause.

Error in the original choice: Choice A is not the correct choice since it is not written properly.

Choice C corrects this error and is the correct choice. It uses noun + noun modifier construction to explain how sound can travel through water for long distances. Notice that a noun + noun modifier construction is very versatile. It can modify any aspect of the preceding clause. It need not be necessarily connected to the subject of the clause. This is what sets it apart from a verb-ing modifier which has been used in choice E.

Image

Grammatically Correct but Incorrect choice E: Notice how the test makers have changed this modifier to verb-ing modifier. As we discussed earlier, a verb-ing modifier when separated by a comma modifies the preceding clause but is connected with the subject of that clause. It may also present the result of the action in the preceding clause. Neither of these modifications in this sentence creates an illogical meaning. Two possible interpretations are:
• Illogical meaning 1
    Sound can travel through water for long distances.
    Sound prevents its energy from dissipating because of the boundaries in the ocean. These boundaries are created by water layers of different temperatures and densities.
    This is illogical since sound itself does not prevent its energy from being dissipated. The boundaries in the ocean prevent the energy of sound from being dissipated.
• Illogical meaning 2
    Sound can travel through water for enormous distances
    This leads to its energy being prevented from dissipation

Image

So as you can see, by changing the modifier, the context of the sentence changes, resulting in this case in an illogical meaning. Now at first look this choice may appear to be correct since grammatically there are no errors. However, since the correct choice must communicated intended logical meaning, this choice is not the correct answer.


HOW TO EVALUATE CHOICES THAT CHANGE THE MEANING?

1. Understand the logical meaning of the original choice.
a. Note how the modifiers have been used.
b. If the meaning is not clear in the original choice, then apply your knowledge of modifiers and determine the suitable modifier for the sentence. Such pre-thinking helps when you review the answer choices.
2. Look for the answer choice that best communicates the same meaning in un-ambiguous and grammatically correct manner.
3. Ignore choices that may be grammatically correct but change the meaning. A seemingly correct grammatical choice may also communicate an illogical meaning.


PRACTICE PROBLEMS

e-GMAT course has 33 practice problems. e-GMAT customers can see the list by clicking the link below.
http://e-gmat.com/blogs/?p=745

We have also posted 2 new problems at the links below. Try them out.

Attachments

5 Strategies that GMAT uses to distort Meaning - V2.0.pdf [834.07 KiB]
Downloaded 869 times

To download please login or register as a user


_________________

Originally posted by egmat on 08 Dec 2011, 07:08.
Last edited by egmat on 09 Dec 2011, 12:02, edited 4 times in total.
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
P
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2852
Re: 5 Strategies that GMAT uses to distort meaning  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 24 Jul 2012, 12:00
9
4
STRATEGY 3 – CHANGE OF CONJUNCTIONS[/u]

How does GMAC use this strategy: Conjunctions connect two or more parts of the sentence and establish certain relationship between/among these parts. Thus, conjunctions are connectors. Each conjunction/connector establishes a certain relationship. Thus, if we change the conjunction/connector, the relationship expressed may change, thereby changing the meaning of the sentence.
In the table below some of the commonly used connectors are presented. This is not an exhaustive list, but just an representative one.
Image

Lets take a simple example below:
Image

Per this sentence, Tom loves to eat two things – sandwich and cheese. Now lets check this sentence below.

Image

Now per this sentence, Tom loves to eat sandwich along with cheese.
Thus, if we compare the two sentences we get the difference in the implied meaning. In sentence 1, when the two entities “sandwich and cheese” were combined using “and”, we got the sense of two independent entities that Tom loves to eat. However, in sentence 2, by using “along with”, now we do not consider sandwich and cheese as two separated entities. They are somehow connected with each other – in this case obviously, cheese is used in the sandwich.
But notice how both meanings are absolutely logical. This is exactly how GMAT may introduce a difference in meaning.

Lets take another set of example sentences below:
Image
Per this sentence, Amy does two things. She eats balanced diet and she does regular workouts. Pretty logical meaning!!
Image
Now per this sentence, Amy only does one of the two things. She either eats balanced diet. Or she does regular workouts. This is also logical. (From personal experience I can tell that there are times when I only do one or the other. But yes, I know doing both is what makes the difference!!)
Image
Now per this sentence, Amy does one action – eats balanced diet – so that she can do the other action effectively – workout. This is also logical. (From personal experience, I can vouch for this as well. When I eat in balanced proportions, I feel energized and I can do better workouts!!)

So as you can see, all three sentences above are logical but all three communicate different meanings and this happened because of change in the connectors/conjunctions. This is exactly how GMAT may introduce a difference in meaning.

OFFICIAL QUESTION 1 – OG VR2 – Q#31

Now lets take an official question:

Nearly two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel have already been put into orbit around the Earth, and the chances of a collision involving such material increase greatly as the amount of both space debris and satellites continue to rise.
    A. as the amount of both space debris and satellites continue to rise
    B. as the rise continues in both the amount of satellites and space debris
    C. as the amount of space debris and the number of satellites continue to rise
    D. with the continually increasing amount of space debris and the number of satellites
    E. with the amount of space debris continuing to increase along with the number of satellites

Intended meaning from Choice A (and Correct Choice C) : The intended meaning of the sentence from choice A can be inferred as follows:
• Nearly two tons of nuclear-reactor fuel have been put into orbit around the Earth.
• The chances of collision involving such material increase greatly as two things continue to increase
o the amount of space debris
AND
o the number of satellites

Grammatically Correct but Incorrect choice (E)– Notice how in choice E the test makers have changed the connector of the two things. Now the connection is made with “along with”. This now implies that there is a relationship between the “increase in number of satellites” and “rise in amount of space debris”. It implies that amount of space debris increases as the number of satellites increase. Although perfectly logical, this is not what choice A implied. And hence this choice is incorrect.

OFFICIAL QUESTION 2 – GMATPREP – LARGEST TRADE-BOOK PUBLISHER

Now let’s take another official question.

The largest trade-book publisher in the US has announced the creation of a new digital imprint division, under which it will publish about 20 purely digital works to be sold online as either electronic books or downloadable copies that can be printed upon purchase.
    A. works to be sold online as either electronic books or
    B. works to sell them online, either as electronic books or
    C. works and it will sell them online as either electronic books or as
    D. works, and selling them online as either electronic books or as
    E. works, and it will sell them online as either electronic books or

Intended meaning from Choice A: Per choice A, the publisher will publish these works with a purpose of having them sold online. Note clearly that this choice does not indicate who will sell the works. It only indicates that online selling is the purpose of taking on this project.

Grammatically Correct but Incorrect choice E: This choice communicates the sense that publisher will publish these works and will sell them online. Notice how that the purpose of embarking on that project is no longer communicated. By using “and”, the sentence simply presents the two as independent facts rather than as purpose relationship. Furthermore, this choice adds the information that publisher will be selling the books online. This information is not presented in the original sentence.
So notice how by simply changing the way the two entities are connected, meaning can be drastically changed. This is why it is of utmost importance that one reads and understands the meaning of the original sentence.


HOW TO EVALUATE CHOICES THAT CHANGE THE MEANING?

1. Understand the logical meaning of the original choice.
a. Note what ideas have been communicated
b. Note how the ideas have been connected.
2. Look for the answer choice that best communicates the same meaning in un-ambiguous and grammatically correct manner.
3. Ignore choices that may be grammatically correct but change the meaning. A seemingly correct grammatical choice may also communicate an illogical meaning.


PRACTICE PROBLEMS

e-GMAT course has 33 practice problems in which there are more than 1 grammatically correct choices but only one is the correct answer. e-GMAT customers can see the list by clicking the link below.
http://e-gmat.com/blogs/?p=745

We have also posted 2 new problems at the links below. Try them out.

_________________

Originally posted by egmat on 14 Dec 2011, 11:22.
Last edited by egmat on 24 Jul 2012, 12:00, edited 1 time in total.
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
P
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2852
Re: 5 Strategies that GMAT uses to distort meaning  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 04 Jan 2012, 14:57
7
1
STRATEGY 4 - CHANGE OF VOICE

How does GMAC use this strategy: TWe know that when a sentence is written in active voice, more emphasis is put on the subject performing the action. Likewise, when a sentence is written in passive voice, more emphasis is put on the entity (object) on which the action is performed. This shift in emphasis may lead to sufficient change in the meaning of the sentence.

Lets take a simple example below:
Image
Following information is presented in the sentence above:
• Who cooked the dinner – Mary
• Any other information – The dinner was cooked with Thai spices
Image
Following information is presented in the sentence above:
• What was cooked – Dinner
• Any other information – The dinner was cooked with Thai spices
o Note that we no longer know who cooked the dinner.

This is exactly how GMAT may introduce a difference in meaning. An answer choice may either introduce the person who does the action (use active voice) or may remove the information about the doer of the action (use passive voice).

Lets take another simple example:
Image
a. Notice how in sentence 1 – the emphasis is on the action that is required for the preparation of the party.
b. However in sentence 2 – the emphasis is now on the doer of the action as well. The gardener had to cut the decayed tree. So sentence 2 provides this additional piece of information.

Thus, you need to understand clearly as to what all information does the original sentence provide. And then you should select the choice that communicates all that information in grammatically correct manner.

OFFICIAL QUESTION 1 – GMATPREP – DECLARATION OF SENTIMENTS

Now lets take an official question:

Before scientists learned how to make a synthetic growth hormone, removing it painstakingly in small amounts from the pituitary glands of human cadavers.
    A. scientists learned how to make a synthetic growth hormone, removing it painstakingly
    B. scientists had learned about making a synthetic growth hormone, they had to remove it painstakingly
    C. scientists learned how to synthesize the growth hormone, it had to be painstakingly removed
    D. learning how to make a synthetic growth hormone, scientists had to remove it painstakingly
    E. learning how to synthesize the growth hormone, it have to be painstakingly removed by scientists

Intended meaning from Choice A: This choice does not communicate a clear meaning. The intended meaning of the sentence from choice A can be inferred as follows:
• Some kind of sequencing is shown using the word “before”.
• Scientists learned how to make a synthetic growth hormone
• However, due to the construction of the sentence, the event that happened prior to this event is not clearly specified. However, we can infer that the prior event may be - removing the growth hormone painstakingly from the pituitary glands of human cadavers.

Thus this choice is incorrect because it does not communicate the meaning of the sentence clearly. Grammatically, this choice does not have an independent clause and hence is a fragment.

Intended meaning from Correct Choice C: Choice C corrects these errors and communicates the inferred meaning clearly. It effectively uses passive voice “it had to be painstakingly removed” to present the prior event. Note that the original sentence (choice A) does not say anything about who actually painstakingly removed the hormone from the human cadavers.

Grammatically Correct but Incorrect choice (D)– Notice how in choice D the test makers have changed the voice of one of the verbs. Now the sentence uses active voice “scientists had to painstakingly remove…”. This changes the meaning of the original sentence since it now adds new information that “scientists” actually had to remove the hormone. This information is not present in the original choice. And hence this choice by “adding” to the meaning of the sentence, changes the meaning and hence is incorrect. Carefully notice that this sentence does not have any grammatical errors.

OFFICIAL QUESTION 2 – GMATPREP – LARGEST TRADE-BOOK PUBLISHER

Now let’s take another official question.

The largest trade-book publisher in the US has announced the creation of a new digital imprint division, under which it will publish about 20 purely digital works to be sold online as either electronic books or downloadable copies that can be printed upon purchase.
    A. works to be sold online as either electronic books or
    B. works to sell them online, either as electronic books or
    C. works and it will sell them online as either electronic books or as
    D. works, and selling them online as either electronic books or as
    E. works, and it will sell them online as either electronic books or

Intended meaning from Choice A (Correct Choice): Per choice A, the publisher will publish these works with a purpose of having them sold online. Note clearly that this choice does not indicate who will sell the works. It only indicates that online selling is the purpose of taking on this project.

Grammatically Correct but Incorrect choice E: This choice communicates the sense that publisher will publish these works and will sell them online. Thus this choice adds the information that publisher will be selling the books online. This information is not presented in the original sentence. Furthermore, as discussed earlier per strategy 3, this choice also changes the meaning by now simply presenting the two events as independent facts rather than as purpose relationship.
So notice how choice E even though is grammatically correct, is not the correct choice because it communicates different meaning from the intended meaning. Notice how the test makers have introduced meaning change by using two different strategies.

HOW TO EVALUATE CHOICES THAT CHANGE THE MEANING?
1. Understand the logical meaning of the original choice.
a. Carefully note all the information that is presented.
2. Look for the answer choice that best communicates the same meaning in un-ambiguous and grammatically correct manner.
3. Ignore choices that may be grammatically correct but change the meaning or the emphasis in the sentence. Pay close attention to choices that add information (by changing to active voice) or remove information (by changing to passive voice).

We have also posted 2 new problems at the links below. Try them out.
4-exercise-sentence-1-advertisement-design-125437.html
4-exercise-sentence-2-rise-in-american-exports-125438.html
_________________

Originally posted by egmat on 30 Dec 2011, 11:38.
Last edited by egmat on 04 Jan 2012, 14:57, edited 1 time in total.
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
P
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2852
Re: 5 Strategies that GMAT uses to distort meaning  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 17 Sep 2012, 09:04
12
1
STRATEGY 5 - CHANGE/REMOVE WORDS THAT PROVIDE CONTEXT

How does GMAC use this strategy: There are several context important words in English language. An answer choice may either add or remove such contextually important words. Since these words provide context, any such change can result in change in meaning of the sentence.
Lets take a simple example below:
Image
Both sentences above are grammatically correct. Both use similar words but the slight difference in the choice of words results in change of meaning of the sentence. Sentence 1 shows the evolution of Amy into a talented actress. This sentence implies that may be Amy was not such a great actress when she began her career. But now she is evolved into one. However, note that sentence 1 omits all this information. All it states is the fact that is current now – Amy is a talented actress. The evolution part is completed omitted. And hence by removing contextually important words, the meaning has been change.
This is exactly how GMAT may introduce a difference in meaning. Thus, you should always read the original sentence carefully and then determine all the information provided in the choice. And then you should select the choice that communicates all that information in grammatically correct manner.
Lets take another simple example:
Image
Use of “may” denotes possibility. It implies that Tom may or may not go to the gym. He has not as yet decided and he may make the decision at the last minute.
Image
Use of “will” denotes certainty. This sentence implies that Tom is determined to go to the gym. He will definitely go to the gym this evening.
Image
Use of “can” shows capability. This sentence implies that circumstances are such that Tom can go to the gym – may be he has completed his work and now has the time to go to the gym or may be he has a baby at home and he has been able to make the necessary arrangements.

So notice how just by changing the helping verb – may, will, can – the meaning could be changed so drastically.

OFFICIAL QUESTION 1 – OG VERBAL REVIEW 2 – Q#43

Now lets take an official question:

Though the term “graphic design” may suggest laying out corporate brochures and annual reports, they have come to signify widely ranging work, from package designs and company logotypes to signs, book jackets, computer graphics, and film titles.
    A. suggest laying out corporate brochures and annual reports, they have come to signify widely ranging
    B. suggest laying out corporate brochures and annual reports, it has come to signify a wide range of
    C. suggest corporate brochure and annual report layout, it has signified widely ranging
    D. have suggested corporate brochure and annual report layout, it has signified a wide range of
    E. have suggested laying out corporate brochures and annual reports, they have come to signify widely ranging

Intended meaning from Choice A: This choice indicates that even though “graphic design” was designed to a certain set of tasks, it has come to serve a wide range of tasks. The sentence provides this list of wide range of activities. It is important to note that the choice indicates that “graphic design” has come to serve this wide range of activities.

Intended meaning from Correct Choice B: Choice B corrects the pronoun number disagreement error and communicates the logical intended meaning of choice A clearly.

Grammatically Correct but Incorrect choice (D)– This choice removes the contextually important term – “has come to” (or evolved). This choice now implies that even though “graphic design” may have been designed to serve purpose X, it actually serves purpose Y. This is a completely different meaning than what is presented by choices A and B. Note the difference once again in the simplified structure.
• Choice A (and Correct choice B) – Though X may be designed to do X, it has come to do Y.
• Choice D – Though X may have been designed to do X, it does Y.

OFFICIAL QUESTION 2 – OG VERBAL REVIEW 2 – Q#52

Now let’s take another official question.

Recently discovered fossil remains strongly suggest that the Australian egg-laying mammals of today are a branch of the main stem of mammalian evolution rather than developing independently from a common ancestor of mammals more than 220 million years ago.
    A. rather than developing independently from
    B. rather than a type that developed independently from
    C. rather than a type whose developments was independent of
    D. instead of developing independently from
    E. instead of a development that was independent of

Intended meaning from Choice A & Correct Choice B: Per choice A & B, Australian egg-laying mammals were not developed independently from a common ancestor. Also, as stated in the non-underlined portion, they are a branch of the main stem of evolution.

Grammatically Correct but Incorrect choice C: Per choice C, these mammals were not of the kind whose development was independent of a common ancestor. This is different from saying that these mammals were not developed independently from a common ancestor.
The difference in meaning can be exemplified by the following set of sentences:
• Like choice A – Company ABC has developed independently from its parent organization XYZ.
o This implies that company ABC has developed from its parent organization. But it has done so independently without any extra outside assistance.
• Like choice D – Development of company ABC is independent of its parent organization XYZ.
o This implies that company ABC development has nothing to do with its parent organization

HOW TO EVALUATE CHOICES THAT CHANGE THE MEANING?
1. Understand the logical meaning of the original choice.
2. Look for the answer choice that best communicates the same meaning in un-ambiguous and grammatically correct manner.
3. Ignore choices that may be grammatically correct but change the meaning or the emphasis in the sentence. Pay close attention to choices that change the contextually important words.

We have also posted 1 new problem at the link below. Try it out.
5-exercise-sentence-1-logitech-success-125439.html
_________________

Originally posted by egmat on 30 Dec 2011, 12:00.
Last edited by egmat on 17 Sep 2012, 09:04, edited 2 times in total.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 05 Oct 2011
Posts: 35
Re: 5 Strategies that GMAT uses to distort meaning  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jan 2012, 02:46
hello egmat,

Here's is one example I would wish if you could make some clarification of meaning on this
In addition to her work on the Miocene hominid fossil record, Mary Leakey contributed to archaeology with her discovery of the earliest direct evidence of hominid activity and painstakingly documenting East African cave paintings.
A. Leakey contributed to archaeology with her discovery of the earliest direct evidence of hominid activity and painstakingly documenting
B. Leakey contributed to archaeology by her discovery of the earliest direct evidence of hominid activity and by painstakingly documenting
C. Leakey was a contributor to archaeology with her discovery of the earliest direct evidence of hominid activity and with her painstaking documentation of
D. Leakey’s contributions to archaeology include her discovery of the earliest direct evidence of hominid activity and her painstaking documentation of
E. Leakey’s contributions to archaeology include her discovering the earliest direct evidence of hominid activity and painstaking documentation of
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
P
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2852
Re: 5 Strategies that GMAT uses to distort meaning  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jan 2012, 10:10
1
Great job at putting your analysis. Lets take each question one by one.

gmatpunjabi wrote:
Question 1

B) Some buildings that were destroyed or heavily damaged in the earthquake last year had been constructed in violation of the city's building code.

My Interpretation: It says that in the Earthquake that happened last year buildings were destroyed that were built in violation of the City’s Building Code.

Since it uses Past Perfect Tense
1) Buildings constructed in violation of Building Code
2) Then Destroyed or Damaged in Earthquake

E) Last year some of the buildings that were destroyed or heavily damaged in the earthquake had been constructed in violation of the city's building code.

My Interpretation is that this sentence literally says the same thing. Last Year in the Earthquake the buildings destroyed and damaged in the Earthquake were in violation of the building code. I feel the Past Perfect tense portrays the same thing. Maybe I am relying just on the tenses not modifiers to determine the sequence of events.


You are indeed correct in your assessment that you are not focusing enough on the modifiers and that you are relying only on the verb tenses. Let me prove this to you.

Your understanding of choice B is perfect. However there is a gap in your understanding of choice E. See it is very important to understand the role of each modifier in a sentence and this is where breaking your sentence down into its clauses helps. Lets see how:


Image

• Last year some of the buildings
o that were destroyed or heavily damaged in the earthquake
• had been constructed in violation of the city's building code.

So as soon as you break this down into clauses you see that “last year” does not even appear in the clause that has “in the earthquake”. In fact now you can see clearly that “last year” really provides timing information about when the buildings were constructed.


Image

So per this sentence (choice E) –
Last year buildings were constructed in violation of the code.
And then these buildings were destroyed in the earthquake.

Now this is perfectly logical meaning. But this sentence is incorrect because it changes the original intended meaning of the sentence. The original sentence did not say that the buildings were constructed last year. Per the original choice, we only knew that the buildings were destroyed in the earthquake last year. Now these buildings could have been constructed last year before the earthquake or much before last year. We do not know this timing. But per choice E, we know for sure that these buildings were constructed last year. And this is where the problem is.


Image

Break the sentence into its clauses so that you can clearly understand what the modifiers modify.
I hope this clarifies your confusion. Let me know if you have any other questions.


Image
_________________
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
P
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2852
Re: 5 Strategies that GMAT uses to distort meaning  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jan 2012, 10:31
gmatpunjabi wrote:
Question 2
A) Gall's hypothesis of there being different mental functions localized in different parts of the brain is widely accepted today.

My Interpretation: In terms of grammar something about this question does not sound right. What I understand is Gall’s theory about mental function localized in different parts of the brain.

You are partially correct here. You only stated the theory – different mental functions are localized in different parts of the brain. You do not state that this theory is widely accepted today. Note how in the original sentence, this is clearly stated.

Gall's hypothesis of there being different mental functions localized in different parts of the brain is widely accepted today.

gmatpunjabi wrote:
B) Gall's hypothesis of different mental functions that are localized in different parts of the brain is widely accepted today

My Interpretation: From what I see is that the hypothesis is about “of different mental functions” and that it is widely accepted today

Exactly right. But note carefully that this choice does not state what the hypothesis is. It just states that the hypothesis is regarding the different mental functions. By the way these different mental functions are localized in different parts of the brain. But this choice fails to state what the hypothesis is.

gmatpunjabi wrote:
C) Gall's hypothesis that different mental functions are localized in different parts of the brain is widely accepted today

My Interpretation: Looking at this choice doesn’t see a huge difference in meaning. It is like to me its saying the same thing exactly. I know it’s a difference of where that is placed but I cannot make out the difference in meaning.

Ok the difference here is that this choice states the hypothesis – the hypothesis is that different mental functions are localized in different parts of the brain.

Looking at these two questions that you have posted, I feel you are having some trouble understanding the modifiers. I think you should revise your modifier concepts and just see how by placing things differently you can imply different things. Lets take another example:

Mary’s perception that living in city is more expensive than living in countryside is flawed.
Mary’s perception of living in city that is more expensive than countryside is flawed.



Can you spot the difference in meaning of the above two sentences?
I look forward to your response!!

Payal
Image
_________________
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
P
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2852
Re: 5 Strategies that GMAT uses to distort meaning  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jan 2012, 10:38
1
ruturajp wrote:
hello egmat,

Here's is one example I would wish if you could make some clarification of meaning on this
In addition to her work on the Miocene hominid fossil record, Mary Leakey contributed to archaeology with her discovery of the earliest direct evidence of hominid activity and painstakingly documenting East African cave paintings.
A. Leakey contributed to archaeology with her discovery of the earliest direct evidence of hominid activity and painstakingly documenting
B. Leakey contributed to archaeology by her discovery of the earliest direct evidence of hominid activity and by painstakingly documenting
C. Leakey was a contributor to archaeology with her discovery of the earliest direct evidence of hominid activity and with her painstaking documentation of
D. Leakey’s contributions to archaeology include her discovery of the earliest direct evidence of hominid activity and her painstaking documentation of
E. Leakey’s contributions to archaeology include her discovering the earliest direct evidence of hominid activity and painstaking documentation of


Hi Ruturajp,
I will definitely provide my clarification but first I would like to see your analysis of this question and where exactly you have problems in understanding this question.
Looking forward to your response.
Thanks,
Payal

Image
_________________
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 Jul 2011
Posts: 144
Concentration: Finance, Technology
Schools: UCSD (D)
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V34
GPA: 2.99
Re: 5 Strategies that GMAT uses to distort meaning  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jan 2012, 21:05
1
Thanks again for your help.

Mary’s perception that living in city is more expensive than living in countryside is flawed.

My Interpretation: What I see within in this sentence is that there is an explicit comparison between “living in the city” and “living in countryside”. These two phrases basically are examples of perceptions. It goes on to say that living in the city perception is flawed.

Mary’s perception of living in city that is more expensive than countryside is flawed.

My Interpretation: What I am starting to see now is that is a sort of modifier. I still can’t grasp the meaning completely, but I do see an error in the modifier placement of that. Its like the placement of that now changes city and I feel the meaning of the sentence is nonsensical. Its like the meaning shifts from the perception to the noun city instead. I have been staring at this 2nd question for 15 mins lol. I think I finally see it the comparison has shifted from perceptions to city and countryside. Honestly I have no idea lol.

Review Material: The Manhattan Sentence Correctionl does not really focus on how the Meaning Changes with Modifiers. Its more about what parts of speech modify other parts of speech. Do you have any suggestions as this is one of the last topics I am having trouble with?
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
P
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2852
Re: 5 Strategies that GMAT uses to distort meaning  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jan 2012, 08:45
A good question and a well formatted post. I like that. Kudos to you. I will respond to your post. But I want you to answer my question below first (remember I win if you learn :) ). This question is more of an inference question.

Which city does sentence 1 talk about? How does it differ from the city (referred to) in sentence 2?
_________________
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 Jul 2011
Posts: 144
Concentration: Finance, Technology
Schools: UCSD (D)
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V34
GPA: 2.99
Re: 5 Strategies that GMAT uses to distort meaning  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Jan 2012, 11:58
Sorry about the late post. Here is my response to your questions Payal and I have a few of more of my own.

Mary’s perception that living in city is more expensive than living in countryside is flawed.

My Interpretation: What I see within in this sentence is that there is an explicit comparison between “living in the city” and “living in countryside”. These two phrases basically are examples of perceptions. It goes on to say that living in the city perception is flawed.

Mary’s perception of living in city that is more expensive than countryside is flawed.

My Interpretation: What I am starting to see now is that is a sort of modifier. I still can’t grasp the meaning completely, but I do see an error in the modifier placement of that. Its like the placement of that now changes city and I feel the meaning of the sentence is nonsensical. Its like the meaning shifts from the perception to the noun city instead. I have been staring at this 2nd question for 15 mins lol. I think I finally see it the comparison has shifted from perceptions to city and countryside. Honestly I have no idea lol.

Review Material: The Manhattan Sentence Correctionl does not really focus on how the Meaning Changes with Modifiers. Its more about what parts of speech modify other parts of speech. Do you have any suggestions as this is one of the last topics I am having trouble with?
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
P
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2852
Re: 5 Strategies that GMAT uses to distort meaning  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jan 2012, 07:47
2
gmatpunjabi wrote:
Sorry about the late post. Here is my response to your questions Payal and I have a few of more of my own.

Mary’s perception that living in city is more expensive than living in countryside is flawed.

My Interpretation: What I see within in this sentence is that there is an explicit comparison between “living in the city” and “living in countryside”. These two phrases basically are examples of perceptions. It goes on to say that living in the city perception is flawed.

Image

Clause 1 - Mary’s perception that
Clause 2 - living in city is more expensive than living in countryside
Clause 1 (Contd.) - is flawed.

Now that we have broken this sentence down to its clauses, we can infer the meaning as follows:
What is flawed - the perception. (clause 1)
What is the perception - that living in city is more expensive than living in countryside (Clause 2 modifies perception)

My Analysis of YOUR Analysis - As you can see, our meaning analysis is vastly different. I do not think you have been able to understand the meaning correctly. And I can see what the problem is...Yes you cannot assign modifiers appropriately. But from your analysis of this sentence, I can sense that it is even more basic issue. You are not paying enough attention on understanding the sentence structure and that is why you are not able to understand the meaning appropriately. You picked out the comparison in the sentence. But you could not correctly mention what feature is being compared.

See for us non-natives, as we are building our understanding of long sentences, we should try to break the sentence into clauses and then do the meaning or error analysis. You really apply "divide and rule" policy since you are now tackling one clause at a time...I am sure if you had simplified the sentence as shown above, you would also have arrived at the correct meaning.

gmatpunjabi wrote:
Mary’s perception of living in city that is more expensive than countryside is flawed.

My Interpretation: What I am starting to see now is that is a sort of modifier. I still can’t grasp the meaning completely, but I do see an error in the modifier placement of that. Its like the placement of that now changes city and I feel the meaning of the sentence is nonsensical. Its like the meaning shifts from the perception to the noun city instead. I have been staring at this 2nd question for 15 mins lol. I think I finally see it the comparison has shifted from perceptions to city and countryside. Honestly I have no idea lol.

Image
Clause 1 - Mary’s perception of living in city
Clause 2 - that is more expensive than countryside
Clause 1 (contd.) - is flawed.

Now that we have broken this sentence down to its clauses, we can infer the meaning as follows:
What is flawed - perception of living in city (Note that this is different from sentence 1)
What is the perception – not stated (Note that sentence 1 stated what is the perception)
What else is stated – city is more expensive than countryside (Note that sentence 1 did not say anything about city being more expensive)

My Analysis of YOUR Analysis - For sentence 2, you were headed in the right direction. You were able to point out that "that" modifies city. However, I can assure you that if you had split the sentence into smaller parts, you would have been more confident in your analysis of this sentence and you would not have stared at the sentence for 15 minutes :)

gmatpunjabi wrote:
Review Material: The Manhattan Sentence Correctionl does not really focus on how the Meaning Changes with Modifiers. Its more about what parts of speech modify other parts of speech. Do you have any suggestions as this is one of the last topics I am having trouble with?


Image
1: Understanding meaning becomes alot easier if the sentence is broken down into clauses. Its as if a complex puzzle becomes simplified all of a sudden. The interlinks between various parts of the sentence become more clear.
2: You state that modifiers is an issue that you are facing. However, in your analysis of sentence 1, you made an error in stating the correct comparison. I think you do spend the efforts in understanding the meaning and your grammatically concepts are also sound. What you lack is the approach that is especially designed for non-natives. Simplify the sentence into its clauses and then do your analysis...
3: Where to practice from - e-GMAT SC course is based on these principles. For each sentence that we analyze, we break it down into its individual clauses. If you would like to see this in action, try out the free trial of both e-GMAT SC course and e-GMAT OGVR2 solutions.

Hope this helps.
Payal
Image
_________________
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
P
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2852
Re: 5 Strategies that GMAT uses to distort meaning  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jan 2012, 21:13
2
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
P
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2852
Re: 5 Strategies that GMAT uses to distort meaning  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Jun 2012, 13:01
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Posts: 325
Location: United States
Concentration: International Business, General Management
GPA: 3.86
WE: Accounting (Commercial Banking)
Re: 5 Strategies that GMAT uses to distort meaning  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jun 2012, 23:04
1
egmat wrote:
I am glad you liked it. We will be posting other such topics in the near future.


Hi Egmat,

I couldn't find the above mentioned file on the webpage, can you please help in finding that document? Please find the screenshot of the page.

Regards
Srinath
Attachments

Egmat.jpg
Egmat.jpg [ 98.64 KiB | Viewed 10575 times ]


_________________
+1 Kudos If found helpful..
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
P
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2852
Re: 5 Strategies that GMAT uses to distort meaning  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jun 2012, 06:49
Dear Koetla,

Thanks for your email. We have launched an in-depth series for Meaning based questions. Please go to the bottom of the course and see the files. You would notice three brand new files there - 1 belonging to a session and the other two being application files. Also wait for our announcement (only if you are on our mailing list)

Image
_________________
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
P
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2852
Re: 5 Strategies that GMAT uses to distort meaning  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Dec 2012, 17:11
Hi folks,

Try this question testing correct placemnt of modifier for logical meaning from OGV2. Do present your analysis, especially of the grammatically correct but logically incorrect answer choice.

Some buildings that were destroyed and heavily damaged in the earthquake last year were constructed in violation of the city's building code.

A) Some buildings that were destroyed and heavily damaged in the earthquake last year were

B) Some buildings that were destroyed or heavily damaged in the earthquake last year had been

C) Some buildings that were destroyed and heavily damaged in the earthquake last year have been

D) Last year the earthquake destroyed or heavly damaged some buildings that have been

E) Last year some of the buildings that were destroyed or heavily damaged in the earth quake had been

Thanks.
_________________
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Posts: 173
Re: 5 Strategies that GMAT uses to distort meaning  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Dec 2012, 21:43
1
egmat wrote:
Hi folks,

Try this question testing correct placemnt of modifier for logical meaning from OGV2. Do present your analysis, especially of the grammatically correct but logically incorrect answer choice.

Some buildings that were destroyed and heavily damaged in the earthquake last year were constructed in violation of the city's building code.

A) Some buildings that were destroyed and heavily damaged in the earthquake last year were

B) Some buildings that were destroyed or heavily damaged in the earthquake last year had been

C) Some buildings that were destroyed and heavily damaged in the earthquake last year have been

D) Last year the earthquake destroyed or heavly damaged some buildings that have been

E) Last year some of the buildings that were destroyed or heavily damaged in the earth quake had been

Thanks.


Will vote for B

Some buildings that were destroyed or heavily damaged in the earthquake last year had been constructed in violation of the city's building code.

Some buildings [that.. last year] had been constructed in violation of the city's building code.
Subject: Some buildings
Verb: had been

that were destroyed or heavily damaged in the earthquake last year
Subject: that - refers to "Some buildings"
Verb: were
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
P
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2852
Re: 5 Strategies that GMAT uses to distort meaning  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Feb 2013, 21:41
HI Folks,

e-gmat brings you a fresh 700+ level question that is based on one of the 5 strategies used by GMAT to introduce errors as mentioned in this article. Try this one and postyour detailed analysis. Good explanations will get Kudos from us. :)

Although Google has launched ‘unchic’ glasses with a computer processor, a battery, and a tiny screen, providing Internet access through wearable technology, it has approached Warby Parker, an e-commerce eyeglass company, to help it design more fashionable frames.

A. Google has launched ‘unchic’ glasses with a computer processor, a battery, and a tiny screen to provide Internet access through wearable technology, it has approached Warby Parker
B. ‘unchic’ glasses have been launched with a computer processor, a battery, and a tiny screen, Google has provided Internet access through wearable technology and has approached Warby Parker
C. ‘unchic’ glasses that have a computer processor, a battery, and a tiny screen have been launched by Google to provide Internet access through wearable technology, Warby Parker has been approached
D. Google, launching ‘unchic’ glasses with a computer processor, a battery, and a tiny screen, has provided Internet access through wearable technology and has approached Warby Parker
E. Google has launched ‘unchic’ glasses that have a computer processor, a battery, and a tiny screen to provide Internet access through wearable technology, Warby Parker has been approached

OA and OE will be posted after some discussion. Happy Solving. :)
Thanks.
_________________
GMAT Club Bot
Re: 5 Strategies that GMAT uses to distort meaning   [#permalink] 22 Feb 2013, 21:41

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 24 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

5 Strategies that GMAT uses to distort meaning

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne