Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 07:45 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 07:45
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,389
Own Kudos:
778,253
 [7]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,389
Kudos: 778,253
 [7]
A certain calculator is able to display at most 10 digits, so that any 08 Oct 2019, 09:19
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

59% (01:41) correct 41% (01:52) wrong based on 292 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
A certain calculator is able to display at most 10 digits, so that any number with a total of more than 10 digits before and after the decimal point cannot be displayed accurately. If x and y are positive integers less than 1,000, can the result of dividing x by y be displayed accurately on the calculator?

(1) 105 < x < 108

(2) 3 < y < 6
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
B
User avatar
firas92
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 16 Jan 2019
Last visit: 02 Dec 2024
Posts: 616
Own Kudos:
1,725
Given Kudos: 142
Location: India
Concentration: General Management
Schools: Tepper '23 (M$) Foster '23 (D)
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
WE:Sales (Other)
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: Tepper '23 (M$) Foster '23 (D)
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
Posts: 616
Kudos: 1,725
A certain calculator is able to display at most 10 digits, so that any 08 Oct 2019, 09:30
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(1) 105 < x < 108

No info about y. The division may or may not be terminating

1 is insufficient

(2) 3 < y < 6

y=4 or 5 which means the division is terminating and we know that x<1000 and so the result can be displayed accurately

2 is sufficient

Answer is B

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Kinshook
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,794
Own Kudos:
5,509
 [1]
Given Kudos: 161
Location: India
Schools: HBS '26 CBS '26 Wharton '26
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: HBS '26 CBS '26 Wharton '26
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
Posts: 5,794
Kudos: 5,509
 [1]
A certain calculator is able to display at most 10 digits, so that any 08 Oct 2019, 10:12
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
A certain calculator is able to display at most 10 digits, so that any number with a total of more than 10 digits before and after the decimal point cannot be displayed accurately. If x and y are positive integers less than 1,000, can the result of dividing x by y be displayed accurately on the calculator?

(1) 105 < x < 108

(2) 3 < y < 6
Show more

Given: A certain calculator is able to display at most 10 digits, so that any number with a total of more than 10 digits before and after the decimal point cannot be displayed accurately.

Asked: If x and y are positive integers less than 1,000, can the result of dividing x by y be displayed accurately on the calculator?

(1) 105 < x < 108
x = {106,107}
Since y is unknown
NOT SUFFICIENT

(2) 3 < y < 6
y = {4,5}
Since y is multiple of 2 or 5, it will result in terminating decimal
Since x is positive integer less than 1000, it is at most 3-digit positive integer,
x/4 = .25x
x/5 = .2x
Both can easily be displayed on the calculator
SUFFICIENT

IMO B
User avatar
ccooley
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 04 Dec 2015
Last visit: 06 Jun 2020
Posts: 931
Own Kudos:
1,642
 [1]
Given Kudos: 115
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 931
Kudos: 1,642
 [1]
A certain calculator is able to display at most 10 digits, so that any 08 Oct 2019, 12:49
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
A certain calculator is able to display at most 10 digits, so that any number with a total of more than 10 digits before and after the decimal point cannot be displayed accurately. If x and y are positive integers less than 1,000, can the result of dividing x by y be displayed accurately on the calculator?

(1) 105 < x < 108

(2) 3 < y < 6
Show more

Interesting! It took me a minute to realize it, but this is a digits and decimals problem. It's basically asking whether x/y has no more than 10 digits. With a complex question stem like this, it helps to write out some examples quickly so you really understand what the different possible situations are.

For example, if x = 1 and y = 3, x/y = 1/3 = 0.333333..., which can't be displayed.

If x = 100 and y = 2, x/y = 50, which can be displayed.

If x = 2 and y = 100, x/y = 0.02, which can also be displayed.

Don't go further with this question unless you have a plan at this point!

The decimal form of a fraction "terminates" if its denominator has only 2s and 5s in its prime factorization, and not any other numbers. So, if y is a number like 2, 4, 10, 25, etc, then the decimal will terminate. Otherwise, the decimal will go on forever, so it won't be able to fit on the calculator.

Is it possible for a decimal to terminate, but still be too big for the calculator? For example, 123454543254354236262436.0 terminates, but won't fit. Same with 0.000000000000000000009. My intuition is that no, this probably won't happen here, since all of the numbers have to be less than 1,000. However, if I have time, I'm going to double check as I work with the statements to make sure this won't happen. I'm PRETTY sure the question is just asking whether the decimal terminates, which is the same as asking whether y has only 2s and 5s in its prime factorization.

Statement 1 105 < x < 108

In the analysis of the question, I decided that it doesn't really matter what x is, it only matters what y is. Let's check some specific examples to be sure. If x = 106 and y = 2, then the result is 53, which fits in the calculator.

If x = 106 and y = 7, then the result is 106/7, which can't be reduced further. The decimal will go on forever and won't fit in the calculator. So, we have a 'yes' and a 'no' case, and this statement is insufficient.

Statement 2 3 < y < 6

y is an integer, and the only integers between 3 and 6 are 4 or 5. So, y has to be either 4 or 5. Both of those numbers only have 2s and/or 5s in their prime factorization. So, any fraction with 4 or 5 in its denominator will give us a decimal that terminates eventually.

Now, is it possible that we'll get a decimal that's just too big to fit in the calculator, even though it terminates? The largest possible value for x is 999, and 999/4 isn't that big. It'll definitely fit. Also, any fraction over 4 will have a decimal that ends in either .0, .25, .5, or .75. Any fraction over 5 will end in either .0, .2, .4, .6, or .8. So, the decimal isn't going to have a ton of extra digits before terminating. I'll say that this decimal will definitely fit in the calculator. So, the statement is sufficient.

The answer is (B).
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,588
Own Kudos:
1,079
Posts: 38,588
Kudos: 1,079
A certain calculator is able to display at most 10 digits, so that any 28 Jul 2025, 22:47
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
Bunuel
Math Expert
105389 posts
kingbucky
496 posts