November 18, 2018 November 18, 2018 07:00 AM PST 09:00 AM PST Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score. November 18th, 7 AM PST November 20, 2018 November 20, 2018 09:00 AM PST 10:00 AM PST The reward for signing up with the registration form and attending the chat is: 6 free examPAL quizzes to practice your new skills after the chat.
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 03 Dec 2012
Posts: 222

A certain cube is composed of 1000 smaller cubes, arranged 1
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Nov 2013, 04:02
Question Stats:
35% (02:55) correct 65% (02:49) wrong based on 193 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
A certain cube is composed of 1000 smaller cubes, arranged 10 by 10 by 10. The top layer of cubes is removed from a face, then from the adjacent face above it, then from the adjacent face to the right of the first. The process is repeated on the same three faces in reverse order. Finally, a last layer is taken from the first face. How many smaller cubes have been removed from the larger cube? (A) 488 (B) 552 (C) 612 (D) 722 (E) 900
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.




Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 50621

Re: A certain cube is composed of 1000 smaller cubes, arranged 1
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Dec 2013, 01:41
mohnish104 wrote: A certain cube is composed of 1000 smaller cubes, arranged 10 by 10 by 10. The top layer of cubes is removed from a face, then from the adjacent face above it, then from the adjacent face to the right of the first. The process is repeated on the same three faces in reverse order. Finally, a last layer is taken from the first face. How many smaller cubes have been removed from the larger cube?
(A) 488 (B) 552 (C) 612 (D) 722 (E) 900 {width}*{length}*{height} = 10*10*10. The top layer of cubes is removed from a face, we get 10*9*10; Then from the adjacent face above it, we get 10*9*9 Then from the adjacent face to the right of the first, we get 9*9*9. The process is repeated on the same three faces in reverse order, we get 8*8*8. Finally, a last layer is taken from the first face, we get 8*7*8=448. {# of removed cubes} = {original}  {final} = 1,000  448 = 552. Answer: B. Hope it's clear.
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread  All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics




Economist GMAT Tutor Instructor
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 68

Re: A certain cube is composed of 1000 smaller cubes, arranged 1
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Nov 2013, 10:52
Hint: Once you see what's happening with the first few operations, this might be a good candidate for ballparking.
_________________
Economist GMAT Tutor http://econgm.at/econgmat (866) 2920660



Senior Manager
Joined: 13 May 2013
Posts: 428

Re: A certain cube is composed of 1000 smaller cubes, arranged 1
[#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Dec 2013, 09:28
Are there any more problems similar to this to practice? I got the steps right but it took me a loooooooong time.
And why does 7x8x8 represent the number of cubes removed? Isn't that the number of cubes remaining of the larger cube?
Never mind, I got it  I misread the question.



Manager
Joined: 15 Mar 2015
Posts: 111

Re: A certain cube is composed of 1000 smaller cubes, arranged 1
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Aug 2016, 05:15
The cube that remains is 7*8*8 (we took three layers from one side, and two from the other two sides, order does not matter) (103)(102)(10)2=7*8*8=448 1000448=552 Posted from my mobile device
_________________
I love being wrong. An incorrect answer offers an extraordinary opportunity to improve.



Intern
Joined: 24 Sep 2016
Posts: 3

Re: A certain cube is composed of 1000 smaller cubes, arranged 1
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Oct 2016, 22:41
I rushed it, it's definitely easier to do it the way mentioned above. I removed them and slowly added them to one another, wasted time doing so.



Director
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 641
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
GPA: 4
WE: Education (Education)

Re: A certain cube is composed of 1000 smaller cubes, arranged 1
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Jan 2017, 16:17
We can answer this by keeping track of how many cubes are lopped off of each side as the cube is trimmed (10 x 10 + 10 x 9 + 9 x 9 + ...), but this approach is tedious and error prone. A more efficient method is to determine the final dimensions of the trimmed cube, then find the difference between the dimensions of the trimmed and original cubes. Let's call the first face A, second face B, and third face C. By the end of the operation, we will have removed 2 layers each from faces B and C, and 3 layers from face A. So B now is 8 cubes long, C is 8 cubes long, and A is 7 cubes long. The resulting solid has dimensions 8 x 8 x 7 cubes or 448 cubes. We began with 1000 cubes, so 1000  448 = 552. Thus, 552 cubes have been removed. The correct answer is B
_________________
Thanks & Regards, Anaira Mitch



Intern
Joined: 04 Feb 2018
Posts: 26
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Technology

Re: A certain cube is composed of 1000 smaller cubes, arranged 1
[#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Sep 2018, 22:39
Bunuel wrote: mohnish104 wrote: A certain cube is composed of 1000 smaller cubes, arranged 10 by 10 by 10. The top layer of cubes is removed from a face, then from the adjacent face above it, then from the adjacent face to the right of the first. The process is repeated on the same three faces in reverse order. Finally, a last layer is taken from the first face. How many smaller cubes have been removed from the larger cube?
(A) 488 (B) 552 (C) 612 (D) 722 (E) 900 {width}*{length}*{height} = 10*10*10. The top layer of cubes is removed from a face, we get 10*9*10; Then from the adjacent face above it, we get 10*9*9 Then from the adjacent face to the right of the first, we get 9*9*9. The process is repeated on the same three faces in reverse order, we get 8*8*8. Finally, a last layer is taken from the first face, we get 8*7*8=448. {# of removed cubes} = {original}  {final} = 1,000  448 = 552. Answer: B. Hope it's clear. Understanding this question itself will take around 2 mins, plus 3040 sec for solving, shall these be attempted or should be guessed and moved over in real test scenarios ?
_________________
If you liked my post or my question, kindly give a Kudos. Thanks.




Re: A certain cube is composed of 1000 smaller cubes, arranged 1 &nbs
[#permalink]
04 Sep 2018, 22:39






