Last visit was: 29 Apr 2024, 05:11 It is currently 29 Apr 2024, 05:11

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13966
Own Kudos [?]: 33033 [2]
Given Kudos: 5781
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 12 Sep 2023
Posts: 21
Own Kudos [?]: 24 [1]
Given Kudos: 59
Location: India
Abhinav: Shah
Concentration: Accounting, Finance
Send PM
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13966
Own Kudos [?]: 33033 [1]
Given Kudos: 5781
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 14 Sep 2023
Posts: 8
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 30
Send PM
Re: A company is considering investing in one of two new products, product [#permalink]
Kindly explain the first question.
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13966
Own Kudos [?]: 33033 [0]
Given Kudos: 5781
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: A company is considering investing in one of two new products, product [#permalink]
Expert Reply
bubuster171 wrote:
Kindly explain the first question.


Statement 1: The expected profits for product A are higher than those for product B in all three years, according to internal financial analysis.

We need to look at and compare second row and fifth row

Second row: Product A (Internal Financial Analysis)

A (Internal Financial Analysis) 60000-50000=10000 80000-70000=10000 100000-80000=20000

Profit for three years= 10000+10000+20000=40000

Second row: Product B A (Internal Financial Analysis)

A (Internal Financial Analysis) 45000-35000=10000 60000-50000=10000 80000-70000=10000

Profit for three years= 10000+10000+10000=30000

Hence 40,000>30,000

Answer: Yes
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Jan 2024
Posts: 13
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: A company is considering investing in one of two new products, product [#permalink]
Sajjad1994 wrote:
bubuster171 wrote:
Kindly explain the first question.


Statement 1: The expected profits for product A are higher than those for product B in all three years, according to internal financial analysis.

We need to look at and compare second row and fifth row

Second row: Product A (Internal Financial Analysis)

A (Internal Financial Analysis) 60000-50000=10000 80000-70000=10000 100000-80000=20000

Profit for three years= 10000+10000+20000=40000

Second row: Product B A (Internal Financial Analysis)

A (Internal Financial Analysis) 45000-35000=10000 60000-50000=10000 80000-70000=10000

Profit for three years= 10000+10000+10000=30000

Hence 40,000>30,000

Answer: Yes


“The expected profits for product A are higher than those for product B in all three years, according to internal financial analysis.”
I thought we would only compare year1, year2, year3 seperately. For example, A's profit in year 1 is 10000 which means the same but not higher than B's profit.
Profits in year 2 are also the same for both.
That means "higher" is not true. WHY we combine?
RC & DI Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Status:Math and DI Expert
Posts: 11185
Own Kudos [?]: 32048 [0]
Given Kudos: 291
Send PM
Re: A company is considering investing in one of two new products, product [#permalink]
Expert Reply
cathyjiang04 wrote:

“The expected profits for product A are higher than those for product B in all three years, according to internal financial analysis.”
I thought we would only compare year1, year2, year3 seperately. For example, A's profit in year 1 is 10000 which means the same but not higher than B's profit.
Profits in year 2 are also the same for both.
That means "higher" is not true. WHY we combine?



If it meant comparing each year separately, it would say “The expected profits for product A are higher than those for product B in each of the three years, according to internal financial analysis.”

The question could be made a bit more clear, and Ill edit it accordingly.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Jul 2023
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: A company is considering investing in one of two new products, product [#permalink]
Statement 2 should be False. B (Internal Analysis) costs for year 1 is equal to B (Industry Experts)
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Jun 2023
Posts: 129
Own Kudos [?]: 71 [1]
Given Kudos: 177
Location: United States (MD)
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
Send PM
Re: A company is considering investing in one of two new products, product [#permalink]
1
Kudos
IanMorgan76 wrote:
Statement 2 should be False. B (Internal Analysis) costs for year 1 is equal to B (Industry Experts)

The catch here is not to compare the cost among the sources.

All sources' analysis say that they individually think product A is going to cost more than product B.

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Manager
Joined: 19 Dec 2021
Posts: 101
Own Kudos [?]: 41 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Location: Viet Nam
GPA: 3.55
Send PM
Re: A company is considering investing in one of two new products, product [#permalink]
1
Kudos
­The combined expected profit for product A is higher than that for product B at the end of third year, according to internal financial analysis. => Yes

Product A's profit according to internal financial analysis
  • Year 1: 10k
  • Year 2: 10k
  • Year 3: 20k
  • => total 40k
Product B's profit according to internal financial analysis
  • Year 1: 10k
  • Year 2: 10k
  • Year 3: 10k
  • => total 30K
Product A's accumulated profit > Product B's accumulated profit

According to all three sources, the expected cost of producing product A is higher than that of producing product B in year 1. => Yes

Source Market Research: Cost A (40k) > Cost B (30k)
Source Internal financial analysis: Cost A (50k) > Cost B (35k)
Source Industry Experts: Cost A (35k) > Cost B (20k)

Internal financial analysis predicts a higher profit for product A than for product B in year 2, but market research predicts the opposite. => No

Source Internal financial analysis
  • A's profit: 10k 
  • B's profit: 10k
  • A = B
GMAT Club Bot
Re: A company is considering investing in one of two new products, product [#permalink]
Moderators:
Math Expert
92990 posts
DI Forum Moderator
1030 posts
RC & DI Moderator
11184 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne