Last visit was: 16 Jul 2025, 17:52 It is currently 16 Jul 2025, 17:52
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 16 Jul 2025
Posts: 102,594
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 98,202
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 102,594
Kudos: 741,983
 [92]
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
82
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
MartyMurray
Joined: 11 Aug 2023
Last visit: 16 Jul 2025
Posts: 1,529
Own Kudos:
5,039
 [14]
Given Kudos: 152
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 1,529
Kudos: 5,039
 [14]
10
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
gmatophobia
User avatar
Quant Chat Moderator
Joined: 22 Dec 2016
Last visit: 16 Jul 2025
Posts: 3,150
Own Kudos:
9,025
 [8]
Given Kudos: 1,860
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
Products:
Posts: 3,150
Kudos: 9,025
 [8]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
GmatKnightTutor
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 31 Jan 2020
Last visit: 16 Jul 2025
Posts: 5,020
Own Kudos:
1,524
 [1]
Given Kudos: 18
Posts: 5,020
Kudos: 1,524
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A consulting firm compiles a yearly ranking of the world's leading companies according to the amount of money each spent on research. It has shown in the past that spending more on research has no correlation with better financial performance. But this year's study found that multinational companies that took a global approach to research financially outperformed those that concentrated their spending on research in their home market.

Which of the following statements is most strongly supported by the information provided?

A. Taking a global approach to research has become necessary in order to achieve business financial success.
B. Companies seeking to improve their financial performance can usually do so by increasing their global research spending.
C. Only the largest countries are able to provide sufficient research innovation to ensure a leading company's profitability.
D. A company with a low ranking in research spending may have better financial performance than a company with a high ranking.
E. The company currently spending the most on research and development is not likely to be among the best in financial performance.


The passage says that a consulting firm made a ranking of companies based on how much they spent on research. And that just because a company may spend more on research, it didn't necessarily mean the company's ranking would be higher. However... if a company took a GLOBAL APPROACH to research (instead of one focused on its home market), it financially performed better.

What does this lead to?

(D) is nice. Basically, Company A may spend less money on research and still have a better ranking than Company B, if, for example, A spent its money mainly on research with a GLOBAL APPROACH and the other spent more but only on research focused on its HOME MARKET.
 
User avatar
GMATGuruNY
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Last visit: 08 Jul 2025
Posts: 1,345
Own Kudos:
3,666
 [2]
Given Kudos: 9
Schools:Dartmouth College
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,345
Kudos: 3,666
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
A consulting firm compiles a yearly ranking of the world's leading companies according to the amount of money each spent on research. It has shown in the past that spending more on research has no correlation with better financial performance. But this year's study found that multinational companies that took a global approach to research financially outperformed those that concentrated their spending on research in their home market.

Which of the following statements is most strongly supported by the information provided?

A. Taking a global approach to research has become necessary in order to achieve business financial success.
B. Companies seeking to improve their financial performance can usually do so by increasing their global research spending.
C. Only the largest countries are able to provide sufficient research innovation to ensure a leading company's profitability.
D. A company with a low ranking in research spending may have better financial performance than a company with a high ranking.
E. The company currently spending the most on research and development is not likely to be among the best in financial performance.

Apply the NEGATION TEST.
When the correct answer is negated, the passage will be contradicted.

D, negated:
A company with a low ranking in research spending CANNOT have better financial performance than a company with a high ranking.
This negation contradicts the passage's contention that there is no correlation between research spending and financial performance.
Since the negation of D contradicts the passage, D is a valid inference. a statement that MUST BE TRUE, given the information in the passage.

User avatar
Amobnc
Joined: 28 Sep 2022
Last visit: 18 Feb 2025
Posts: 39
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 250
Location: Portugal
GMAT Focus 1: 605 Q82 V83 DI75
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 605 Q82 V83 DI75
Posts: 39
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
A consulting firm compiles a yearly ranking of the world's leading companies according to the amount of money each spent on research. It has shown in the past that spending more on research has no correlation with better financial performance. But this year's study found that multinational companies that took a global approach to research financially outperformed those that concentrated their spending on research in their home market.

Which of the following statements is most strongly supported by the information provided?

A. Taking a global approach to research has become necessary in order to achieve business financial success.
B. Companies seeking to improve their financial performance can usually do so by increasing their global research spending.
C. Only the largest countries are able to provide sufficient research innovation to ensure a leading company's profitability.
D. A company with a low ranking in research spending may have better financial performance than a company with a high ranking.
E. The company currently spending the most on research and development is not likely to be among the best in financial performance.
­Hi!
When we see the following question stem:
Which of the following statements is most strongly supported by the information provided?

Can we assume this as a pure inference question? As in, its a type of question where a correct answer will bring in no new information?
Or, is this a strenghten question? where, new information can come into play in getting to the correct answer choice?

This question stem always confuses me on how to approach the question and its answer choices..
Can I get an expert opinion on the above please?

Thanks,
-Amobnc.
User avatar
Haffun
Joined: 24 Oct 2023
Last visit: 18 May 2024
Posts: 102
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 132
Location: India
Posts: 102
Kudos: 17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Amobnc
Bunuel
A consulting firm compiles a yearly ranking of the world's leading companies according to the amount of money each spent on research. It has shown in the past that spending more on research has no correlation with better financial performance. But this year's study found that multinational companies that took a global approach to research financially outperformed those that concentrated their spending on research in their home market.

Which of the following statements is most strongly supported by the information provided?

A. Taking a global approach to research has become necessary in order to achieve business financial success.
B. Companies seeking to improve their financial performance can usually do so by increasing their global research spending.
C. Only the largest countries are able to provide sufficient research innovation to ensure a leading company's profitability.
D. A company with a low ranking in research spending may have better financial performance than a company with a high ranking.
E. The company currently spending the most on research and development is not likely to be among the best in financial performance.
­Hi!
When we see the following question stem:
Which of the following statements is most strongly supported by the information provided?

Can we assume this as a pure inference question? As in, its a type of question where a correct answer will bring in no new information?
Or, is this a strenghten question? where, new information can come into play in getting to the correct answer choice?

This question stem always confuses me on how to approach the question and its answer choices..
Can I get an expert opinion on the above please?

Thanks,
-Amobnc.
­This is a pure inference question because the questions asks the passage to support the answer choice. If the question asked the answer choice to support the argument in the passage, it would be a strengthen question. 
Check: P supports A? -> inference or
A supports P? -> strengthen (where P is passage, A is answer choice.)
avatar
Engineer1
Joined: 01 Jan 2014
Last visit: 15 Jun 2025
Posts: 207
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 457
Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Posts: 207
Kudos: 543
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaB, could you please help explain why E is incorrect? Thank you!­

Summary: Consulting firm did compiled world's leading companies
(a) Past data has shown $$ Spent of research NOT= Better financial peformance
However, this year the data shows:
(b) Global approach to reasearch -> Firms financially outperform the ones with only local research approach.

D. A company with a low ranking in research spending may have better financial performance than a company with a high ranking.
This makes sense based on the no correlation part stated in (a).

E. The company currently spending the most on research and development is not likely to be among the best in financial performance.
Why is this wrong? This option says "not likely". That means, the company currently spending on research may not have the best financial performance. We don't know if the spending on research is for local or global research. Therefore, this option also fulfills the "no correlation" point (a). ­
avatar
Engineer1
Joined: 01 Jan 2014
Last visit: 15 Jun 2025
Posts: 207
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 457
Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Posts: 207
Kudos: 543
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATGuruNY
Bunuel
A consulting firm compiles a yearly ranking of the world's leading companies according to the amount of money each spent on research. It has shown in the past that spending more on research has no correlation with better financial performance. But this year's study found that multinational companies that took a global approach to research financially outperformed those that concentrated their spending on research in their home market.

Which of the following statements is most strongly supported by the information provided?

A. Taking a global approach to research has become necessary in order to achieve business financial success.
B. Companies seeking to improve their financial performance can usually do so by increasing their global research spending.
C. Only the largest countries are able to provide sufficient research innovation to ensure a leading company's profitability.
D. A company with a low ranking in research spending may have better financial performance than a company with a high ranking.
E. The company currently spending the most on research and development is not likely to be among the best in financial performance.
Apply the NEGATION TEST.
When the correct answer is negated, the passage will be contradicted.

D, negated:
A company with a low ranking in research spending CANNOT have better financial performance than a company with a high ranking.
This negation contradicts the passage's contention that there is no correlation between research spending and financial performance.
Since the negation of D contradicts the passage, D is a valid inference. a statement that MUST BE TRUE, given the information in the passage.

­GMATGuruNY: Are we supposed to use the negation test for other question types, except Assumption? If you have some resurces / links, could you please provide that for my further reference? Thank you.
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 16 Jul 2025
Posts: 16,111
Own Kudos:
74,360
 [3]
Given Kudos: 475
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,111
Kudos: 74,360
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Engineer1
KarishmaB, could you please help explain why E is incorrect? Thank you!­

Summary: Consulting firm did compiled world's leading companies
(a) Past data has shown $$ Spent of research NOT= Better financial peformance
However, this year the data shows:
(b) Global approach to reasearch -> Firms financially outperform the ones with only local research approach.

D. A company with a low ranking in research spending may have better financial performance than a company with a high ranking.
This makes sense based on the no correlation part stated in (a).

E. The company currently spending the most on research and development is not likely to be among the best in financial performance.
Why is this wrong? This option says "not likely". That means, the company currently spending on research may not have the best financial performance. We don't know if the spending on research is for local or global research. Therefore, this option also fulfills the "no correlation" point (a). ­
"Not likely" is not the same as "may or may not be".
When I say, "A may or may not happen," I mean that we can't say. 
When I say, "A is not likely to happen," I mean that most probably it will not happen. 

We are given that "research" and "financial results" are not correlated. So a lower ranked company in reasearch may be better in result. We can say that the top company in research may not be the top company in results but we cannot say that the top company in research is not likely to be the top in results. We are implying here that there is something about the money spent on research which actually reduces financial gains. 
­
User avatar
GMATGuruNY
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Last visit: 08 Jul 2025
Posts: 1,345
Own Kudos:
3,666
 [2]
Given Kudos: 9
Schools:Dartmouth College
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,345
Kudos: 3,666
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
Engineer1
Quote:
­GMATGuruNY: Are we supposed to use the negation test for other question types, except Assumption? 
­The negation test can be applied to Assumption CRs and Inference CRs.
When the corrrect answer to an Assumption CR is negated, the conclusion will be invalidated.
When the correct answer to an Inference CR is negated, the passage will be contradicted.
I would not apply the negation test to other types of CRs.
 ­
User avatar
Gemmie
Joined: 19 Dec 2021
Last visit: 27 May 2025
Posts: 501
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 76
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Technology, Economics
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V84 DI83
GPA: 3.55
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V84 DI83
Posts: 501
Kudos: 352
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
D. A company with a low ranking in research spending may have better financial performance than a company with a high ranking.

The information tells us that spending more on research doesn't necessarily lead to better financial performance. It also highlights that multinational companies with a global research strategy outperform those that focus their research efforts on their home market. This suggests that companies can achieve good financial performance without necessarily spending a lot on research, and that a global approach to research can be more beneficial than a local one.



Let's analyze why the other statements are not strongly supported:

A. Taking a global approach to research has become necessary in order to achieve business financial success.
The information suggests that a global approach can be beneficial, but it doesn't say it's absolutely necessary.

B. Companies seeking to improve their financial performance can usually do so by increasing their global research spending.
There's no guarantee that increased spending will lead to better performance.

C. Only the largest countries are able to provide sufficient research innovation to ensure a leading company's profitability.
The information doesn't say anything about country size, only about the importance of a global approach.

E. The company currently spending the most on research and development is not likely to be among the best in financial performance.
While it's possible, the information doesn't say that the top spender won't perform well.­
User avatar
Feb2024
Joined: 27 Jan 2024
Last visit: 16 Jul 2025
Posts: 46
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,270
Posts: 46
Kudos: 12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello MartyMurray

Correct me if I am wrong, but I understand from the passage that the reasoning you have given for Option D is no longer valid after the latest study "But this year's study found...".

What Option D states may have been correct prior to the latest study, however, since the latest study essentially says that companies with spending more on research has positive correlation with better financial performance.

Kindly clear my doubt. Other experts may too pitch-in KarishmaB GMATNinja gmatophobia
MartyMurray
A consulting firm compiles a yearly ranking of the world's leading companies according to the amount of money each spent on research. It has shown in the past that spending more on research has no correlation with better financial performance. But this year's study found that multinational companies that took a global approach to research financially outperformed those that concentrated their spending on research in their home market.

Which of the following statements is most strongly supported by the information provided?


The correct answer to this question is the one that is "most strongly supported" by the passage. So, this question is a Conclusion question, and the correct answer must follow logically from the statements in the passage.

A. Taking a global approach to research has become necessary in order to achieve business financial success.

The passage says that "this year's study found that multinational companies that took a global approach to research financially outperformed those that concentrated their spending on research in their home market."

Notice that that information means that companies that did not take "a global approach to research" did not perform as well financially as companies that did take a global approach.

At the same time, it does not mean that companies that did not take a a global approach to research did not achieve business financial success. After all, a company can achieve financial success even if it does not perform as well as another company.

So, this choice goes beyond what's supported by the passage.

Eliminate.

B. Companies seeking to improve their financial performance can usually do so by increasing their global research spending.

Here's what the passage says that's related to "global research spending": "But this year's study found that multinational companies that took a global approach to research financially outperformed those that concentrated their spending on research in their home market."

Notice that this information is about "multinational companies that took a global approach to research." Since multinational companies are not all companies, information about multinational companies does not support a conclusion about what companies "can usually do." After all, multinational companies represent only a fraction of companies.

So, this choice is not supported by the passage.

Eliminate.

C. Only the largest countries are able to provide sufficient research innovation to ensure a leading company's profitability.

There is basically no support for this choice since the passage says nothing about countries' ability to provide research innovation.

Eliminate.

D. A company with a low ranking in research spending may have better financial performance than a company with a high ranking.

Here's what the passage says about "ranking in research spending" and "financial performance": "A consulting firm compiles a yearly ranking of the world's leading companies according to the amount of money each spent on research. It has shown in the past that spending more on research has no correlation with better financial performance."

We see that the passage indicates that "spending more on research," in other words, having a high "ranking in research spending," is not correlated with better financial performance. What that information also means is that having a low ranking is not correlated with worse financial performance.

According, we can see that this choice follows from what the passage says since, if having a low ranking is not correlated with worse financial performance, then "A company with a low ranking in research spending may have better financial performance than a company with a high ranking."

Keep.

E. The company currently spending the most on research and development is not likely to be among the best in financial performance.

Here's what the passage says about "spending on research and development" and "financial performance": "It (a consulting firm) has shown in the past that spending more on research has no correlation with better financial performance."

Notice that what the passage says about the consulting firm's research indicates that, in general, spending on research in is not correlated, in other words, does not move along with, financial performance. So, the two are not positively or negatively correlated. In other words, research spending doesn't indicate anything about financial performance.

Accordingly, the fact that a company is "currently spending the most on research and development" does not indicate that it "is not likely to be among the best in financial performance." After all, if research spending doesn't indicate anything about financial performance, then information on research spending doesn't indicate how likely a company is to be among the best in financial performance.

So, this choice isn't supported.

Eliminate.

The correct answer is (D).
User avatar
MartyMurray
Joined: 11 Aug 2023
Last visit: 16 Jul 2025
Posts: 1,529
Own Kudos:
5,039
 [1]
Given Kudos: 152
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 1,529
Kudos: 5,039
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Feb2024
Hello MartyMurray

Correct me if I am wrong, but I understand from the passage that the reasoning you have given for Option D is no longer valid after the latest study "But this year's study found..."
Take another look at the passage. It actually doesn't indicate that about the latest study.
Quote:
What Option D states may have been correct prior to the latest study, however, since the latest study essentially says that companies with spending more on research has positive correlation with better financial performance.
It doesn't say that.

Here's what it says:

But this year's study found that multinational companies that took a global approach to research financially outperformed those that concentrated their spending on research in their home market.

Notice that that sentence doesn't say that companies "spending more on research" had better financial performance.

Rather, it says that companies that "took a global approach" financially outperformed those that "concentrated their spending on research in their home market."

So, that statement doesn't indicate that what the first study indicated is not valid.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7359 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts