Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
A fifty-year accord signed in 1994 by the United States,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Jul 2010, 12:10
2
9
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
85% (hard)
Question Stats:
41% (01:04) correct 59% (01:11) wrong based on 546 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
A fifty-year accord signed in 1994 by the United States, Canada, and Mexico dictated the reduction of tariffs that member nations had been permitted to levy on imports from other member nations. A. dictated the reduction of tariffs that member nations had been permitted to levy B. dictated the tariff reduction that member nations had been levying C. dictates the tariff reduction member nations have been permitted to levy D. dictated the reduction of tariffs that member nations are permitted to levy E. dictates the reduction of tariffs permitted for levying by member nations
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/Login.
_________________
But there’s something in me that just keeps going on. I think it has something to do with tomorrow, that there is always one, and that everything can change when it comes. http://aimingformba.blogspot.com
Got this one wrong but I see my mistake. I went too fast and thought that "reduction of tariffs" were a little wordy and went with the two that had "tariff reduction"
A. dictated the reduction of tariffs that member nations had been permitted to levy - the accord is still active B. dictated the tariff reduction that member nations had been levying - unidiomatic C. dictates the tariff reduction member nations have been permitted to levy - that missing D. dictated the reduction of tariffs that member nations are permitted to levy - CORRECT E. dictates the reduction of tariffs permitted for levying by member nations - that missing
I myself picked 'A' as the OA but below is the reasoning for why D is correct.
The sentence is talking of 2 different things.
The accord dictated reduction of tariffs
Tariffs that member nations are permitted to levy on imports
Between A and D.
A suggests that member nations had been permitted to levy tariffs [means member nations are not permitted to levy tariffs anymore] whereas D says member nations are still permitted to levy tariffs [present tense]....which is correct
A fifty-year accord signed in 1994 by the United States, Canada, and Mexico dictated the reduction of tariffs that member nations had been permitted to levy on imports from other member nations.
A. dictated the reduction of tariffs that member nations had been permitted to levy
B. dictated the tariff reduction that member nations had been levying - this changes the meaning. The member nations are permitted to levy tariffs. This sentence says "member nations had been levying tariff reduction"....which is not the intended meaning.
C. dictates the tariff reduction member nations have been permitted to levy - this changes the meaning. The member nations are permitted to levy tariffs. This sentence says "member nations have been permitted to levy tariff reduction"....which is not the intended meaning.
D. dictated the reduction of tariffs that member nations are permitted to levy - CORRECT
E. dictates the reduction of tariffs permitted for levying by member nations - awkward
dictated is past tense. So basically you are saying that it was over sometime back and still going on. "dictated" w/ present tense [are]. Did I miss something?
Originally posted by nusmavrik on 23 Jul 2010, 19:26.
Last edited by nusmavrik on 23 Jul 2010, 21:34, edited 1 time in total.
Compare with this SC. The use of past tense (violated) is correct in the OA since judge overturned the ban, so ban is history now. "ban violated the state laws" ---> is correct
Sentence is logical, there is no contradiction - State laws and ban couldn't coexist, so Judge was nice to let go the ban.
Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water bikes from the tranquil waters of Puget Sound, a judge overturned the ban on the grounds of violating state laws for allowing the use of personal watercraft on common waterways A. of violating state laws for allowing B. of their violating state laws to allow C. that it violates state laws that allowed D. that it violated state laws allowing E. that state laws were being violated allowing
You guys are having a nice and friendly discussion around here. Allow me to join in and give you my take on the issue;
A fifty-year accord signed in 1994 by the United States, Canada, and Mexico dictated the reduction of tariffs that member nations had been permitted to levy on imports from other member nations. A. dictated the reduction of tariffs that member nations had been permitted to levy---- You absolutely don't need the past perfect; "to permit" is not an "action verb". B. dictated the tariff reduction that member nations had been levying-----------------> You don't levy a "tariff reduction", you do levy a tariff. C. dictates the tariff reduction member nations have been permitted to levy----------->You don't levy a "tariff reduction", you do levy a tariff. D. dictated the reduction of tariffs that member nations are permitted to levy----------> "dictated" is fine because of the date "1994" and "are permitted" is the correct use of the verb. E. dictates the reduction of tariffs permitted for levying by member nations ------------> "permitted for levying" is clearly unacceptable
In general, avoid using the present perfect and the past perfect when you're dealing with non-action verbs such as "to permit", "to allow", etc... especially on the GMAT.
A similar SC question from the GMAT is shown below. Guess what the correct answer is.
A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump into the Great Lakes.
(A) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump (B) reduced the phosphate amount that municipalities had been dumping (C) reduces the phosphate amount municipalities have been allowed to dump (D) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities are allowed to dump (E) reduces the amount of phosphates allowed for dumping by municipalities
_________________
Dakar Azu is The GMAT Doctor. Dakar is an experienced GMAT teacher who can be reached at http://700gmatclub.com. He prepares aspiring business students thoroughly to get them well over the GMAT 700-score hurdle through his online GMAT courses.
Voila. Thanks for the explanations. I agree with the explanation for "levy". You don't levy a "tariff reduction", you do levy a tariff.
A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump into the Great Lakes.
(A) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump (B) reduced the phosphate amount that municipalities had been dumping (C) reduces the phosphate amount municipalities have been allowed to dump (D) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities are allowed to dump (E) reduces the amount of phosphates allowed for dumping by municipalities
For the above question i'm optioning D. A is wrong since it uses the past perfect "had been permitted". Past perfect is used to sequence two past actions. Guess if municipalities already dumped the wastes then they can't possibly reduce the amount of phosphates in the dumping. Its done, its over. Hence A OUT. D is correct.
TheGMATDoctor wrote:
You guys are having a nice and friendly discussion around here. Allow me to join in and give you my take on the issue;
A fifty-year accord signed in 1994 by the United States, Canada, and Mexico dictated the reduction of tariffs that member nations had been permitted to levy on imports from other member nations. A. dictated the reduction of tariffs that member nations had been permitted to levy---- You absolutely don't need the past perfect; "to permit" is not an "action verb". B. dictated the tariff reduction that member nations had been levying-----------------> You don't levy a "tariff reduction", you do levy a tariff. C. dictates the tariff reduction member nations have been permitted to levy----------->You don't levy a "tariff reduction", you do levy a tariff. D. dictated the reduction of tariffs that member nations are permitted to levy----------> "dictated" is fine because of the date "1994" and "are permitted" is the correct use of the verb. E. dictates the reduction of tariffs permitted for levying by member nations ------------> "permitted for levying" is clearly unacceptable
In general, avoid using the present perfect and the past perfect when you're dealing with non-action verbs such as "to permit", "to allow", etc... especially on the GMAT.
A similar SC question from the GMAT is shown below. Guess what the correct answer is.
A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump into the Great Lakes.
(A) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump (B) reduced the phosphate amount that municipalities had been dumping (C) reduces the phosphate amount municipalities have been allowed to dump (D) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities are allowed to dump (E) reduces the amount of phosphates allowed for dumping by municipalities
Compare with this SC. The use of past tense (violated) is correct in the OA since judge overturned the ban, so ban is history now. "ban violated the state laws" ---> is correct
Sentence is logical, there is no contradiction - State laws and ban couldn't coexist, so Judge was nice to let go the ban.
Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water bikes from the tranquil waters of Puget Sound, a judge overturned the ban on the grounds of violating state laws for allowing the use of personal watercraft on common waterways A. of violating state laws for allowing B. of their violating state laws to allow C. that it violates state laws that allowed D. that it violated state laws allowing E. that state laws were being violated allowing
OA is D
I am quite ok with OA here.........here allowing is not the usual verb but functions as an Adverb ...allowing the(adjective) use(noun).....its a special case
You guys are having a nice and friendly discussion around here. Allow me to join in and give you my take on the issue;
In general, avoid using the present perfect and the past perfect when you're dealing with non-action verbs such as "to permit", "to allow", etc... especially on the GMAT.
A similar SC question from the GMAT is shown below. Guess what the correct answer is.
A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump into the Great Lakes.
(A) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump (B) reduced the phosphate amount that municipalities had been dumping (C) reduces the phosphate amount municipalities have been allowed to dump (D) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities are allowed to dump (E) reduces the amount of phosphates allowed for dumping by municipalities
I also guess it to be D ........thanks for the explanation
Re: A fifty-year accord signed in 1994 by the United States,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Sep 2015, 03:53
aiming4mba wrote:
A fifty-year accord signed in 1994 by the United States, Canada, and Mexico dictated the reduction of tariffs that member nations had been permitted to levy on imports from other member nations. A. dictated the reduction of tariffs that member nations had been permitted to levy B. dictated the tariff reduction that member nations had been levying C. dictates the tariff reduction member nations have been permitted to levy D. dictated the reduction of tariffs that member nations are permitted to levy E. dictates the reduction of tariffs permitted for levying by member nations
The accord was signed in the past, hence the tense of the verb 'dictate' should also be in the past. Eliminate C and E. The member nations are still levying tariff. Hence ' are permitted to levy' is correct. IMO the answer is D.
Re: A fifty-year accord signed in 1994 by the United States,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Apr 2018, 13:45
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!
Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
close
41% (01:04) correct 
