Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 03:06 It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 03:06
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
ruchi857
Joined: 23 Nov 2014
Last visit: 05 Mar 2019
Posts: 57
Own Kudos:
349
 [10]
Given Kudos: 510
Posts: 57
Kudos: 349
 [10]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
tintin2412
Joined: 16 Aug 2017
Last visit: 17 Sep 2018
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Posts: 5
Kudos: 1
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ruchi857
Joined: 23 Nov 2014
Last visit: 05 Mar 2019
Posts: 57
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 510
Posts: 57
Kudos: 349
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bounce1987
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Last visit: 17 Mar 2024
Posts: 70
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 194
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V32
Products:
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V32
Posts: 70
Kudos: 129
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Options C and D are out of scope. If we negate options C and D, the argument is not affected. For C, the quality of the toothpaste is not talked about. Moreover, since the argument says that the toothpaste remained the same for both the packages nothing can be assumed about a different toothpaste. For D, nothing about a different brand of toothpaste is mentioned. In CR and in the verbal section in general, you can argue that some other option might be the right answer but that should not be the goal.

Premise: During test marketing, the toothpaste in the new package outsold the toothpaste in the old package two to one.

Conclusion: The marketing group concluded that increased product recognition had a positive effect on the toothpaste's sales.

The conclusion talks about "the toothpaste". It doesn't talk about any other brand or quality.
avatar
Squib17
Joined: 17 Aug 2016
Last visit: 05 Jan 2020
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
84
 [1]
Given Kudos: 26
Posts: 37
Kudos: 84
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Took more than the optimum time to solve this, but got it correct. Here is my thought process -

Conclusion : The marketing group concluded that increased product recognition had a positive effect on the toothpaste's sales.

Now how did they come to that conclusion?

They changed the packaging and got a new logo ---> this led to sales increases.

Hence, they are assuming that "bright packing and distinctive logo" increases the "product recognition", which leads to more sales.


Which of the following is an assumption on which the marketing group's conclusion is based?


A. Brightly colored and distinctive packaging increased the product recognition of the toothpaste. [ matches with the pre-thinking and should be the answer]


B. The new package of toothpaste was sold at a slightly lower price. [ Out of Scope - we are not told anything about the price]


C. The package design of the toothpaste is more important than the quality of the toothpaste. [We are not told anything about the quality of the toothpaste, hence we should not take the into consideration. But let us apply negation test to be 100% sure. ]

"The package design of the toothpaste is NOT more important than the quality of the toothpaste."

Now even if it not more important than quality, does this in anyway tell me that it will impact the sales of the toothpaste. No it does not! Hence, this can't be the answer.

D. Even a less popular brand of toothpaste would have sold as well in the new package. [This could have been a weakener, but this cannot be an assumption, if a less popular brand would have sold well, this tell us that the distinct logo does not help in brand recognition, which is not the case, as per the premises.]


E. Even a simpler, less distinctive package design would have increased the product recognition of the toothpaste.[Out of Scope - this cannot be the assumption for product recognition and high sales.]



Regards,
Squib
User avatar
harshitapvt6658
Joined: 23 Nov 2024
Last visit: 02 Jul 2025
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Location: India
GMAT 1: 230 Q49 V49
GMAT 1: 230 Q49 V49
Posts: 2
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The answer is A but still getting confused between c and d
User avatar
abc3107cba
Joined: 31 May 2025
Last visit: 23 Sep 2025
Posts: 3
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
i can't understand why not b and if b is wrong how a is correct
User avatar
adithya000
Joined: 03 Oct 2022
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 143
Posts: 11
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
C is an unnecessary comparison and D would be a good option for inference but not here. This is what i feel.
ruchi857
I cant see how A, the OA is the strong assumption answer. I seem to find a convincing answer with options C and D as well.
User avatar
aspirant785
Joined: 30 Jul 2025
Last visit: 11 Nov 2025
Posts: 10
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 10
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
c cannot be as it talks about the quality and the conclusion made by the team is based on what was implemented , studied as the sale experiment and then concluded
this is what i feel btw*
ruchi857
I cant see how A, the OA is the strong assumption answer. I seem to find a convincing answer with options C and D as well.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts