Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 01:34 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 01:34
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
805+ Level|   Non-Math Related|            
User avatar
Fish181
Joined: 13 Dec 2023
Last visit: 22 Jan 2025
Posts: 135
Own Kudos:
1,002
 [48]
Given Kudos: 53
Status:Applying in R1 of 2024 to t15
Affiliations: University of Tennessee
Location: United States (CO)
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
GMAT Focus 1: 605 Q76 V84 DI80
GMAT Focus 2: 615 Q78 V86 DI78
GPA: 3.62
WE:Analyst (Consumer Packaged Goods)
GMAT Focus 2: 615 Q78 V86 DI78
Posts: 135
Kudos: 1,002
 [48]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
46
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 11,238
Own Kudos:
43,699
 [10]
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,238
Kudos: 43,699
 [10]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Yeetyeti38
Joined: 16 May 2023
Last visit: 19 Apr 2025
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 12
Kudos: 14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
SnorLax_7
Joined: 19 Nov 2022
Last visit: 22 Sep 2025
Posts: 87
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,925
Posts: 87
Kudos: 29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi chetan2u Sajjad1994 GMATCoachBen

Kindly can you confirm if the answer posted here is correct and reasoning behind it ?

Thanks !
User avatar
GMATCoachBen
Joined: 21 Mar 2017
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 465
Own Kudos:
2,719
 [3]
Given Kudos: 210
Status:Professional GMAT Trainer
Affiliations: GMAT Coach
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT Focus 1: 775 Q87 V90 DI88 (Online)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V44
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V44
GMAT 4: 770 Q50 V45 (Online)
GMAT 5: 780 Q51 V48
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 775 Q87 V90 DI88 (Online)
GMAT 5: 780 Q51 V48
Posts: 465
Kudos: 2,719
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
SnorLax_7
Hi chetan2u Sajjad1994 GMATCoachBen

Kindly can you confirm if the answer posted here is correct and reasoning behind it ?

Thanks !
SnorLax_7 ­The answer is wrong. Good call to check! Haha, some of these are pretty hard, but 5% accuracy so far is suspicious.

chetan2u do you want to edit the OA?

Here's the official answer and explanation, from the OG 2024 "hards":­­­­
Attachments

2024-02-22 13_24_09-GMAT Official Practice.png
2024-02-22 13_24_09-GMAT Official Practice.png [ 216.95 KiB | Viewed 12694 times ]

User avatar
Fish181
Joined: 13 Dec 2023
Last visit: 22 Jan 2025
Posts: 135
Own Kudos:
1,002
 [1]
Given Kudos: 53
Status:Applying in R1 of 2024 to t15
Affiliations: University of Tennessee
Location: United States (CO)
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
GMAT Focus 1: 605 Q76 V84 DI80
GMAT Focus 2: 615 Q78 V86 DI78
GPA: 3.62
WE:Analyst (Consumer Packaged Goods)
GMAT Focus 2: 615 Q78 V86 DI78
Posts: 135
Kudos: 1,002
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sorry about that! Answers are updated.
User avatar
Revets
Joined: 10 Sep 2023
Last visit: 27 Jan 2025
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 50
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The answer should be BB

In BB, we're isolating for radio ads. We have a single variable left. Thus we can tell directly whether or not an increased amount of radio ads increases sales metrics or not

For CC, we're left with newspapers. We don't even know the potential interactions between newspapers and radio ads, and I don't believe we can obviously gleam this to be the correct answer without some outside assumptions of there being no intermixing influence

BB makes more sense, the OA explanation does not do a good job explaining why CC is the right answer­ and I would still disagree
User avatar
TheVDR
Joined: 09 Jun 2023
Last visit: 05 Nov 2025
Posts: 254
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 20
Location: India
Posts: 254
Kudos: 224
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Revets
The answer should be BB

In BB, we're isolating for radio ads. We have a single variable left. Thus we can tell directly whether or not an increased amount of radio ads increases sales metrics or not

For CC, we're left with newspapers. We don't even know the potential interactions between newspapers and radio ads, and I don't believe we can obviously gleam this to be the correct answer without some outside assumptions of there being no intermixing influence

BB makes more sense, the OA explanation does not do a good job explaining why CC is the right answer­ and I would still disagree
Consider Newspaper contribution to be "a", Radio contribution to be "y" and all other contributions to be "P". For City X, total contribution would be (a + y + kP) [for some k, as we don't know ratio of other contributions between City X and City Y, and we haven't been told that Newspaper and Radio are the only contributions]. Similarly, for City Y, total contributioj would be (a + 2y + qP).

We are told that,
(a + y + kP) = (a + 2y + qP)

and we are asked that will the equation still hold when either a = 0 (Answe BB) OR y = 0 (Answer CC) [Eliminating answers A, D and E as they are pretty out of context]

Clearly, putting y = 0 will give the context whether the equation holds or not.
Putting a = 0 will lead to requiring more context.

Hence, eliminating Radio Advertising is the only way to precisely estimate whether it was effective in the first place or not.

­
User avatar
Gemmie
Joined: 19 Dec 2021
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 491
Own Kudos:
427
 [1]
Given Kudos: 76
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Technology, Economics
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V84 DI83
GPA: 3.55
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V84 DI83
Posts: 491
Kudos: 427
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­Consultant's Claim: The consultant claims that radio advertising has not improved mattress sales because sales were similar despite double the radio advertising in City Z compared to City X.

Testing the Claim: To test this claim, we need to see if radio advertising has a significant impact on sales compared to no radio advertising.

By eliminating radio advertising in both cities, we create a scenario where any differences in sales can be attributed to the absence of radio advertising, thus effectively testing the consultant's claim.


City X: Eliminate radio advertising
City Z: Eliminate radio advertising­
User avatar
yipmewmew
Joined: 26 May 2021
Last visit: 15 Jul 2025
Posts: 230
Own Kudos:
83
 [1]
Given Kudos: 792
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V33
GMAT 2: 730 Q48 V42
Products:
GMAT 2: 730 Q48 V42
Posts: 230
Kudos: 83
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATCoachBen

SnorLax_7
Hi chetan2u Sajjad1994 GMATCoachBen

Kindly can you confirm if the answer posted here is correct and reasoning behind it ?

Thanks !
SnorLax_7 ­The answer is wrong. Good call to check! Haha, some of these are pretty hard, but 5% accuracy so far is suspicious.

chetan2u do you want to edit the OA?

Here's the official answer and explanation, from the OG 2024 "hards":­
­GMATCoachBen here the option of changing the content of the radio is wrong because if we change the content for both cities and the sales stay the same, we still wont be able to separete the effect of the radio on sales right? I read through the explanation in your screenshot, it wasnt very clear to understand. Hence, requesting you to weigh in here.
User avatar
vijayakrishnan
Joined: 17 May 2024
Last visit: 20 May 2025
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 19
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sv2023

GMATCoachBen

SnorLax_7
Hi chetan2u Sajjad1994 GMATCoachBen

Kindly can you confirm if the answer posted here is correct and reasoning behind it ?

Thanks !
SnorLax_7 ­The answer is wrong. Good call to check! Haha, some of these are pretty hard, but 5% accuracy so far is suspicious.

chetan2u do you want to edit the OA?

Here's the official answer and explanation, from the OG 2024 "hards":­
­GMATCoachBen here the option of changing the content of the radio is wrong because if we change the content for both cities and the sales stay the same, we still wont be able to separete the effect of the radio on sales right? I read through the explanation in your screenshot, it wasnt very clear to understand. Hence, requesting you to weigh in here.
­i agree. i am in the same boat. i selected "eliminate newspaper advertising" for city x and "eliminate radio advertising" for city y. Now we only have radio for city X and newspaper for city Y. Given that all the other factors are the same between the two cities, in this scenario you'd expect city X to have very low sales compared to city Y.
User avatar
Adarsh_24
Joined: 06 Jan 2024
Last visit: 03 Apr 2025
Posts: 251
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,016
Posts: 251
Kudos: 57
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sv2023
GMATCoachBen

Quote:

Kindly can you confirm if the answer posted here is correct and reasoning behind it ?

Thanks !
­The answer is wrong. Good call to check! Haha, some of these are pretty hard, but 5% accuracy so far is suspicious.

do you want to edit the OA?

Here's the official answer and explanation, from the OG 2024 "hards":­
­here the option of changing the content of the radio is wrong because if we change the content for both cities and the sales stay the same, we still wont be able to separete the effect of the radio on sales right? I read through the explanation in your screenshot, it wasnt very clear to understand. Hence, requesting you to weigh in here.
If radio is removed from both and sales remain same then radio doesn’t have any effect on the sales.

Question is not saying the double is not causing any effect , right? Rather radio didn’t have any effect at all regardless of its amount.
User avatar
tommychudw
Joined: 16 Dec 2024
Last visit: 29 Jun 2025
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
6
 [1]
Given Kudos: 31
Location: Singapore
Posts: 20
Kudos: 6
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Through this, I found out that you can select the same option for both selections. Nicely, better now than later.
User avatar
adv95
Joined: 23 Feb 2025
Last visit: 07 Nov 2025
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 273
Location: India
Schools: IIM (A)
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
Schools: IIM (A)
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
Posts: 29
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
While changes to the newspaper or television advertising strategy may affect mattress sales, those changes would not necessarily clarify the effect radio advertising has had on mattress sales. Even if changing the content of the radio advertising in either city were to bring about an increase in mattress sales, it may not be possible to determine if the consultant’s claim was correct. If the previous content had a negligible or a positive effect on sales, then an increase in sales coinciding with the change of content would be evidence that the consultant’s claim is incorrect. On the other hand, if the previous content had a negative effect on sales, then the new content may simply have had less of a negative effect. The best way to determine if radio advertising does not improve mattress sales is to eliminate radio advertising in both cities. Any change in sales may be attributed to the radio advertising, indicating whether the consultant’s claim was correct. If there was no change, the consultant’s claim would be strongly supported.
City X: The correct answer is Eliminate radio advertising.
City Z: The correct answer is Eliminate radio advertising

Yeetyeti38
Is there an OE for this?
Moderators:
Math Expert
105379 posts
496 posts