IMO DA new polymer, recently developed as a material for minor car repairs, was imported to Country M after being sold successfully in Country B. Despite a high number of initial purchases following an effective marketing campaign, sales figures in Country M were unsatisfactory, and importation of the product was eventually discontinued. It can be deduced that consumers in Country M are more critical about car repair products than they are in Country B.
Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the argument?
Premise :
1. new polymer - sold in country B, now wanting to be sold in country M
2. high number of initial purchases - this means people liked it but something happened inspite of that
3. sales eventually discontinued
Conclusion:
consumers (Country M) more critical about car repair products than consumers (Country B)
Now, we need to find that gap which would've eventually been the cause behind the decline.
It can be any 3rd factor.
(A) Whether the use of polymers without
professional safety equipment such as gas masks can be harmful to the health of the average consumer
Not mentioned in the scope
(B) Whether consumers in Country M are
prepared to perform repairs on their own cars instead of hiring paid professionals
Not mentioned in the scope
(C) Whether consumers in Country M are open-minded as far as the introduction of new products to the market is concerned
Refer to "despite a high number of initial purchases"
Hence eliminate the option
(D) Whether the polymer's effectivity is influenced by climactic differences between regions
Correct, inline with our thinking.
(E) Whether repairs done using the new polymer can be
painted with regular car paintNot mentioned in the scope