Last visit was: 18 May 2026, 20:58 It is currently 18 May 2026, 20:58
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
555-605 (Medium)|   Idioms/Diction/Redundancy|   Parallelism|                                 
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,489
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,489
Kudos: 7,687
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ShankSouljaBoi
Joined: 21 Jun 2017
Last visit: 28 Mar 2026
Posts: 594
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4,090
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 620 Q47 V30
GMAT 3: 650 Q48 V31
GPA: 3.1
WE:Corporate Finance (Non-Profit and Government)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Bharadwaj176
Joined: 26 Apr 2020
Last visit: 18 Mar 2022
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 May 2026
Posts: 3,921
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,921
Kudos: 3,586
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bharadwaj176
I ended up in choosing D after POE of B&D because:

Conversational pace does 2 things.
- hampers the ability of Children
- results in not making sense of Speech.

I assumed these 2 are Parallel instead because ''not making sense'' is the result of preceding sentence ''it hampers the ability of some children to distinguish discrete sounds and words''.

Or Probably 'that' missing in front of 'results in not making' is an indicator that it is not parallel to 'hampers'?
If we need to make these sentences parallel, Is 'that' mandatory before 'results in not making' (Although meaningfully doesnt make sense)

Did I Misunderstood the sentence ? Can someone help?
Hi Bharadwaj176, following doesn't make much sense, does it?

"conversational pace results in not making sense of speech".

At the very least it should be:

"conversational pace results in some children not making sense of speech".
avatar
soondoobu
Joined: 21 Jul 2020
Last visit: 17 Aug 2022
Posts: 63
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
WE:Operations (Manufacturing)
Posts: 63
Kudos: 14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A new study suggests that the conversational pace of everyday life may be so brisk it hampers the ability of some children for distinguishing discrete sounds and words and, the result is, to make sense of speech.


(A) it hampers the ability of some children for distinguishing discrete sounds and words and, the result is, to make "that" is required. sentence is also not parallel

(B) that it hampers the ability of some children to distinguish discrete sounds and words and, as a result, to make meaning makes sense, sentence is parallel "to distinguish...and...to make"

(C) that it hampers the ability of some children to distinguish discrete sounds and words and, the result of this, they are unable to make not parallel

(D) that it hampers the ability of some children to distinguish discrete sounds and words, and results in not making sentence is not parallel

(E) as to hamper the ability of some children for distinguishing discrete sounds and words, resulting in being unable to make"brisk as to hamper" is not idiomatic
User avatar
ProKiller
Joined: 22 Jun 2015
Last visit: 25 Sep 2021
Posts: 84
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 135
Status:Learning!
GMAT 1: 580 Q47 V24
GMAT 2: 680 Q48 V33
Products:
GMAT 2: 680 Q48 V33
Posts: 84
Kudos: 57
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ritjn2003
A new study suggests that the conversational pace of everyday life may be so brisk it hampers the ability of some children for distinguishing discrete sounds and words and, the result is, to make sense of speech.

(A) it hampers the ability of some children for distinguishing discrete sounds and words and, the result is, to make

(B) that it hampers the ability of some children to distinguish discrete sounds and words and, as a result, to make

(C) that it hampers the ability of some children to distinguish discrete sounds and words and, the result of this, they are unable to make

(D) that it hampers the ability of some children to distinguish discrete sounds and words, and results in not making

(E) as to hamper the ability of some children for distinguishing discrete sounds and words, resulting in being unable to make


Simplified version: A new study suggests that XYZ may be so brisk that it hampers ABC and, as a result, PQR.

(A) it hampers the ability of some children for distinguishing discrete sounds and words and, the result is, to make

(B) that it hampers the ability of some children to distinguish discrete sounds and words and, as a result, to make - :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

(C) that it hampers the ability of some children to distinguish discrete sounds and words and, the result of this, they are unable to make

(D) that it hampers the ability of some children to distinguish discrete sounds and words, and results in not making

(E) as to hamper the ability of some children for distinguishing discrete sounds and words, resulting in being unable to make
avatar
rinkuda
Joined: 05 Jul 2018
Last visit: 07 May 2022
Posts: 8
Given Kudos: 13
Posts: 8
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi @e-GMAT team,

Wanted to check on the usage of THAT here in option B as a connector. As i understand THAT when used as a connector is optional. Excluding it from a sentence should not be considered as a deterministic error. Can you confirm ? Thanks a lot.
User avatar
armaankumar
Joined: 10 Jun 2020
Last visit: 07 Feb 2026
Posts: 101
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 104
Location: India
GMAT 1: 610 Q41 V33 (Online)
GMAT 2: 650 Q47 V33 (Online)
GPA: 3.4
GMAT 2: 650 Q47 V33 (Online)
Posts: 101
Kudos: 73
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A new study suggests that the conversational pace of everyday life may be so brisk it hampers the ability of some children for distinguishing discrete sounds and words and, the result is, to make sense of speech.

We look for the two point of error:
1)So brisk requires the parallel structure so X that Y
2)"it hampers the ability of some children" carries over to the other part of the structure and must make sense

(A) it hampers the ability of some children for distinguishing discrete sounds and words and, the result is, it hampers the ability of some children to make

(B) that it hampers the ability of some children to distinguish discrete sounds and words and, as a result, it hampers the ability of some children to make

(C) that it hampers the ability of some children to distinguish discrete sounds and words and, the result of this, it hampers the ability of some children they are unable to make

(D) that it hampers the ability of some children to distinguish discrete sounds and words, and it hampers the ability of some children results in not making

(E) as to hamper the ability of some children for distinguishing discrete sounds and words, resulting in being unable to make
User avatar
AhmedMoharam89
Joined: 07 Mar 2020
Last visit: 19 Oct 2025
Posts: 32
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 258
Concentration: International Business
Posts: 32
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
So let me get this clear. in this question since we had the marker "so brisk that", "the ability to..." becomes the main noun and we try to make the two infinitives "to distinguish" and "to result" parallel?

and in another case where the "so brisk that" didnt exist in the question we would for choice D. for example
"A new study suggests that the conversational pace of everyday life hampers the ability of some children for distinguishing discrete sounds and words , and results in not making sense of speech."
User avatar
ParamjitDasGMAT
Joined: 01 Jan 2016
Last visit: 18 May 2026
Posts: 108
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 30
Status:GMAT Private Tutor
Affiliations: Co-founder at a GMAT Prep Company
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q86 V89 DI82
GMAT Focus 2: 695 Q84 V90 DI80
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V40
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V44
GMAT 4: 750 Q50 V41
GPA: 3.66
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 2: 695 Q84 V90 DI80
GMAT 4: 750 Q50 V41
Posts: 108
Kudos: 134
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AhmedMoharam89
AjiteshArun

ParamjitDasGMAT

Can we deconstruct the question here?

The open marker is "and" so we have 2 elements here. the elements maybe "hampers and results" or "to distinguish and to make".

what does it refer to? IMO, the only logical antecedent is " the conversational pace" because it can't mean the "study" or "day".
so if we rephrase: (A new study suggests that the conversational pace of everyday life may be so brisk that the conversational pace of everyday life hampers the ability of some children to distinguish discrete sounds and words and, as a result, to make sense of speech.)

OR

(A new study suggests that the conversational pace of everyday life may be so brisk that the conversational pace of everyday life hampers the ability of some children to distinguish discrete sounds and words and and results in not making sense of speech).

Even though, I have placed both sentences now, I can't see why Option D is still incorrect. I.e what is wrong in saying that a certain action "results" in something?

in such type of problems, how do I correctly identify The Root Phrase

I hope by this way you understand my point of weakness in this type of scenarios and address me how to rectify it.

Thanks

There is nothing wrong in saying that a certain ACTION results in something (an outcome). The only problem? The "conversational pace of.." cannot really be thought of as an action. Which also further illustrates my idea in the first answer that the two verbs shouldn't be placed in parallel in this case (false parallelism).

Hope this helps

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,431
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,431
Kudos: 1,012
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
   1   2   3 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7393 posts
580 posts
368 posts