Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 17:36 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 17:36
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
605-655 Level|   Weaken|         
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,072
 [12]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
10
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
stne
Joined: 27 May 2012
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,771
Own Kudos:
1,974
 [2]
Given Kudos: 658
Posts: 1,771
Kudos: 1,974
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
desertEagle
Joined: 14 Jun 2014
Last visit: 03 Aug 2025
Posts: 567
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 413
Posts: 567
Kudos: 344
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
unraveled
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 10 Apr 2025
Posts: 2,721
Own Kudos:
2,258
 [1]
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,721
Kudos: 2,258
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A number of seriously interested amateur astronomers have tested the new Exodus refractor telescope. With it, they were able to observe in crisp detail planetary features that were seen only as fuzzy images in their 8-inch (approximately 20-centimeter) Newtonian telescopes, even though the 8-inch telescopes, with their wider apertures, gather more light than the 4-inch (approximately 10-centimeter) Exodus. Given these amateur astronomers’ observational findings, any serious amateur astronomers ought to choose the Exodus if she or he is buying a telescope for planetary observation.

Which one of the following most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) Telescopes of certain types will not perform well unless they have been precisely collimated, a delicate adjustment requiring deftness. - WRONG. Neutral or irrelevant.

(B) Image quality is only one of several different factors that, taken together, should determine the choice of a telescope for planetary observation. - CORRECT. What if this factor plays only a small negligible part. If others play a more significant part then image quality based conclusion is weakened.

(C) Many serious amateur astronomers have no intention of buying a telescope for planetary observation. - WRONG. A contender but what does "many" stands for.

(D) The comparisons made by the amateur astronomers were based on observations made during several different observation sessions. - WRONG. Strengthens actually.

(E) The substance used to make the lenses of Exodus telescopes differs from that used in the lenses of other telescopes. - WRONG. How different is it? better or worst, anything is possible.

Answer B.
User avatar
ragnarok13
Joined: 15 Oct 2019
Last visit: 31 Oct 2025
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
7
 [1]
Given Kudos: 297
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q80 V84 DI77
GMAT Focus 2: 655 Q88 V84 DI76
GMAT Focus 2: 655 Q88 V84 DI76
Posts: 28
Kudos: 7
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
@[color=#ff0000]Bunuel[/color] @GMATNinja @GMATNinjaTwo What is the thought behind option A not being a good weakener.
If the astronomers are amateur, then most likely they do not have the deftness required to carry out the collimating procedure. If only they had done this with the Newtonian, they might have observed even better images than the one seen with the Exodus (and also maybe the Exodus might not have required the collimating) Based on this, the assessment done by the group is faulty and should not be trusted to make the decision regarding the Exodus. Option B : while image quality is not the only factor to be considered while making the decision, it still is a factor. And the fact that the conclusion's decision is based on the difference in findings by the amateur astronomers, then from their view image quality has been given a better preference for Exodus vs Newtonian. The recommendation is based on the limitations of amateurs, but under their range of understanding, image quality counts.
How is this a stronger weakener than Option A. Please explain. Thanks.
unraveled
A number of seriously interested amateur astronomers have tested the new Exodus refractor telescope. With it, they were able to observe in crisp detail planetary features that were seen only as fuzzy images in their 8-inch (approximately 20-centimeter) Newtonian telescopes, even though the 8-inch telescopes, with their wider apertures, gather more light than the 4-inch (approximately 10-centimeter) Exodus. Given these amateur astronomers’ observational findings, any serious amateur astronomers ought to choose the Exodus if she or he is buying a telescope for planetary observation.

Which one of the following most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) Telescopes of certain types will not perform well unless they have been precisely collimated, a delicate adjustment requiring deftness. - WRONG. Neutral or irrelevant.

(B) Image quality is only one of several different factors that, taken together, should determine the choice of a telescope for planetary observation. - CORRECT. What if this factor plays only a small negligible part. If others play a more significant part then image quality based conclusion is weakened.

(C) Many serious amateur astronomers have no intention of buying a telescope for planetary observation. - WRONG. A contender but what does "many" stands for.

(D) The comparisons made by the amateur astronomers were based on observations made during several different observation sessions. - WRONG. Strengthens actually.

(E) The substance used to make the lenses of Exodus telescopes differs from that used in the lenses of other telescopes. - WRONG. How different is it? better or worst, anything is possible.

Answer B.
User avatar
agrasan
Joined: 18 Jan 2024
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 534
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5,193
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 534
Kudos: 130
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi ragnarok13

If I may chime in, I think the main reason why option A is wrong is we don't know whether new Exodus refractor telescope falls under "telescopes of certain types" discussed in option A or not, thus, option A isn't a weakener for the argument as the conclusion specifically focuses on Exodus as given: "Given these amateur astronomers’ observational findings, any serious amateur astronomers ought to choose the Exodus if she or he is buying a telescope for planetary observation."

Please find the similar question below based on the same logic.
https://gmatclub.com/forum/a-number-of- ... 67951.html


ragnarok13
@[color=#ff0000]Bunuel[/color] @GMATNinja @GMATNinjaTwo What is the thought behind option A not being a good weakener.
If the astronomers are amateur, then most likely they do not have the deftness required to carry out the collimating procedure. If only they had done this with the Newtonian, they might have observed even better images than the one seen with the Exodus (and also maybe the Exodus might not have required the collimating) Based on this, the assessment done by the group is faulty and should not be trusted to make the decision regarding the Exodus. Option B : while image quality is not the only factor to be considered while making the decision, it still is a factor. And the fact that the conclusion's decision is based on the difference in findings by the amateur astronomers, then from their view image quality has been given a better preference for Exodus vs Newtonian. The recommendation is based on the limitations of amateurs, but under their range of understanding, image quality counts.
How is this a stronger weakener than Option A. Please explain. Thanks.
unraveled
A number of seriously interested amateur astronomers have tested the new Exodus refractor telescope. With it, they were able to observe in crisp detail planetary features that were seen only as fuzzy images in their 8-inch (approximately 20-centimeter) Newtonian telescopes, even though the 8-inch telescopes, with their wider apertures, gather more light than the 4-inch (approximately 10-centimeter) Exodus. Given these amateur astronomers’ observational findings, any serious amateur astronomers ought to choose the Exodus if she or he is buying a telescope for planetary observation.

Which one of the following most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) Telescopes of certain types will not perform well unless they have been precisely collimated, a delicate adjustment requiring deftness. - WRONG. Neutral or irrelevant.

(B) Image quality is only one of several different factors that, taken together, should determine the choice of a telescope for planetary observation. - CORRECT. What if this factor plays only a small negligible part. If others play a more significant part then image quality based conclusion is weakened.

(C) Many serious amateur astronomers have no intention of buying a telescope for planetary observation. - WRONG. A contender but what does "many" stands for.

(D) The comparisons made by the amateur astronomers were based on observations made during several different observation sessions. - WRONG. Strengthens actually.

(E) The substance used to make the lenses of Exodus telescopes differs from that used in the lenses of other telescopes. - WRONG. How different is it? better or worst, anything is possible.

Answer B.
User avatar
ragnarok13
Joined: 15 Oct 2019
Last visit: 31 Oct 2025
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
7
 [1]
Given Kudos: 297
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q80 V84 DI77
GMAT Focus 2: 655 Q88 V84 DI76
GMAT Focus 2: 655 Q88 V84 DI76
Posts: 28
Kudos: 7
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
agrasan I am still not very convinced :shh: In my opinion, elimination of Option A was on a very weak ground. However, there is a long way to go before I start becoming more confident in my ability to eliminate the CR options. Thanks for sharing your thought process though. I'll try and replicate this perspective in other CR questions :)
agrasan
Hi ragnarok13

If I may chime in, I think the main reason why option A is wrong is we don't know whether new Exodus refractor telescope falls under "telescopes of certain types" discussed in option A or not, thus, option A isn't a weakener for the argument as the conclusion specifically focuses on Exodus as given: "Given these amateur astronomers’ observational findings, any serious amateur astronomers ought to choose the Exodus if she or he is buying a telescope for planetary observation."

Please find the similar question below based on the same logic.
https://gmatclub.com/forum/a-number-of- ... 67951.html


ragnarok13
@[color=#ff0000]Bunuel[/color] @GMATNinja @GMATNinjaTwo What is the thought behind option A not being a good weakener.
If the astronomers are amateur, then most likely they do not have the deftness required to carry out the collimating procedure. If only they had done this with the Newtonian, they might have observed even better images than the one seen with the Exodus (and also maybe the Exodus might not have required the collimating) Based on this, the assessment done by the group is faulty and should not be trusted to make the decision regarding the Exodus. Option B : while image quality is not the only factor to be considered while making the decision, it still is a factor. And the fact that the conclusion's decision is based on the difference in findings by the amateur astronomers, then from their view image quality has been given a better preference for Exodus vs Newtonian. The recommendation is based on the limitations of amateurs, but under their range of understanding, image quality counts.
How is this a stronger weakener than Option A. Please explain. Thanks.
unraveled
A number of seriously interested amateur astronomers have tested the new Exodus refractor telescope. With it, they were able to observe in crisp detail planetary features that were seen only as fuzzy images in their 8-inch (approximately 20-centimeter) Newtonian telescopes, even though the 8-inch telescopes, with their wider apertures, gather more light than the 4-inch (approximately 10-centimeter) Exodus. Given these amateur astronomers’ observational findings, any serious amateur astronomers ought to choose the Exodus if she or he is buying a telescope for planetary observation.

Which one of the following most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) Telescopes of certain types will not perform well unless they have been precisely collimated, a delicate adjustment requiring deftness. - WRONG. Neutral or irrelevant.

(B) Image quality is only one of several different factors that, taken together, should determine the choice of a telescope for planetary observation. - CORRECT. What if this factor plays only a small negligible part. If others play a more significant part then image quality based conclusion is weakened.

(C) Many serious amateur astronomers have no intention of buying a telescope for planetary observation. - WRONG. A contender but what does "many" stands for.

(D) The comparisons made by the amateur astronomers were based on observations made during several different observation sessions. - WRONG. Strengthens actually.

(E) The substance used to make the lenses of Exodus telescopes differs from that used in the lenses of other telescopes. - WRONG. How different is it? better or worst, anything is possible.

Answer B.
User avatar
adityaprateek15
Joined: 26 May 2023
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 268
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 309
Location: India
GPA: 2.7
Products:
Posts: 268
Kudos: 104
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A number of seriously interested amateur astronomers have tested the new Exodus refractor telescope. With it, they were able to observe in crisp detail planetary features that were seen only as fuzzy images in their 8-inch (approximately 20-centimeter) Newtonian telescopes, even though the 8-inch telescopes, with their wider apertures, gather more light than the 4-inch (approximately 10-centimeter) Exodus. Given these amateur astronomers’ observational findings, any serious amateur astronomers ought to choose the Exodus if she or he is buying a telescope for planetary observation.

Which one of the following most seriously weakens the argument?


(A) Telescopes of certain types will not perform well unless they have been precisely collimated, a delicate adjustment requiring deftness. - Okay! but which telescope doesn't have these feature? Is it the Exodus or Newtonian or both? Not clear. Incorrect.

(B) Image quality is only one of several different factors that, taken together, should determine the choice of a telescope for planetary observation. - This option says that Image quality is only one of the many requirements. Think about getting into T15 schools, an average GMAT score is only of the many criteria for securing admit in these schools. Therefore, this option weakens the conclusion. Correct.

(C) Many serious amateur astronomers have no intention of buying a telescope for planetary observation. - We don't care about the intention of these astronomers. We just need to think about those who plan to buy a telescope will not buy exodus over others. Incorrect.

(D) The comparisons made by the amateur astronomers were based on observations made during several different observation sessions. - This option actually strengthens the conclusion. Incorrect.

(E) The substance used to make the lenses of Exodus telescopes differs from that used in the lenses of other telescopes. - Sure, the substance, the material could all be different, but, does it provide any significant advantage against other telescopes in the market? Incorrect.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts