It is currently 17 Nov 2017, 20:26

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A nutritionist studying the effects of massive doses of

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

VP
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 1078

Kudos [?]: 687 [1], given: 0

A nutritionist studying the effects of massive doses of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2008, 06:38
1
KUDOS
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

75% (00:48) correct 25% (01:23) wrong based on 14 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A nutritionist studying the effects of massive doses of vitamin C found that of a group of 600 people who regularly took 1,500 mg of vitamin C daily for a year, fewer than 9 percent suffered serious cases of flu; of a group of 600 people who took 250 mg of vitamin C (the standard recommended daily allowance) daily for a year, 34 percent suffered at least one serious case of flu; and of a group of 600 people who took no vitamin C for a year (other than that found in the foods in a balanced diet), 32 percent suffered at least one serious case of flu.
Which of the following hypotheses is best supported by the evidence above?
(A) The effectiveness of vitamin C in preventing serious cases of flu increases in direct proportion to the amount of vitamin C taken.
(B) Vitamin C is helpful in preventing disease.
(C) Doses of vitamin C that exceed the standard recommended daily allowance by 500 percent will reduce the incidence of serious cases of flu by 25 percent.
(D) Massive doses of vitamin C can help to prevent serious case of flu.
(E) A balanced diet contains less than 250 mg of vitamin C.

Kudos [?]: 687 [1], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 14 Dec 2007
Posts: 4

Kudos [?]: 3 [1], given: 0

Re: cr 1000 d 5 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2008, 18:34
1
KUDOS
go with D.

Kudos [?]: 3 [1], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 1543

Kudos [?]: 185 [1], given: 2

Re: cr 1000 d 5 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2008, 19:48
1
KUDOS
out of all these, i like C the best. D is suspect because it uses the term 'massive' ... who says that 1500 is massive ? I dont like the ambiguity of that, so Ill go with the next strongest option, which to me is C.

Kudos [?]: 185 [1], given: 2

Director
Joined: 08 Jun 2007
Posts: 575

Kudos [?]: 109 [1], given: 0

Re: cr 1000 d 5 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2008, 20:26
1
KUDOS
marcodonzelli wrote:
A nutritionist studying the effects of massive doses of vitamin C found that of a group of 600 people who regularly took 1,500 mg of vitamin C daily for a year, fewer than 9 percent suffered serious cases of flu; of a group of 600 people who took 250 mg of vitamin C (the standard recommended daily allowance) daily for a year, 34 percent suffered at least one serious case of flu; and of a group of 600 people who took no vitamin C for a year (other than that found in the foods in a balanced diet), 32 percent suffered at least one serious case of flu.
Which of the following hypotheses is best supported by the evidence above?
(A) The effectiveness of vitamin C in preventing serious cases of flu increases in direct proportion to the amount of vitamin C taken.
(B) Vitamin C is helpful in preventing disease.
(C) Doses of vitamin C that exceed the standard recommended daily allowance by 500 percent will reduce the incidence of serious cases of flu by 25 percent.
(D) Massive doses of vitamin C can help to prevent serious case of flu.
(E) A balanced diet contains less than 250 mg of vitamin C.

Its a close call between C and E.
But in C is calculation 25% is not correct. Such figures cant be concluded accurately.
I am leaning for E.

Kudos [?]: 109 [1], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 19 Aug 2007
Posts: 202

Kudos [?]: 113 [1], given: 0

Re: cr 1000 d 5 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2008, 20:32
1
KUDOS
marcodonzelli wrote:
A nutritionist studying the effects of massive doses of vitamin C found that of a group of 600 people who regularly took 1,500 mg of vitamin C daily for a year, fewer than 9 percent suffered serious cases of flu; of a group of 600 people who took 250 mg of vitamin C (the standard recommended daily allowance) daily for a year, 34 percent suffered at least one serious case of flu; and of a group of 600 people who took no vitamin C for a year (other than that found in the foods in a balanced diet), 32 percent suffered at least one serious case of flu.
Which of the following hypotheses is best supported by the evidence above?
(A) The effectiveness of vitamin C in preventing serious cases of flu increases in direct proportion to the amount of vitamin C taken.
(B) Vitamin C is helpful in preventing disease.
(C) Doses of vitamin C that exceed the standard recommended daily allowance by 500 percent will reduce the incidence of serious cases of flu by 25 percent.
(D) Massive doses of vitamin C can help to prevent serious case of flu.
(E) A balanced diet contains less than 250 mg of vitamin C.

I say D. the tone in C is too extreme with the use of 'will' and there is nothing in the passage to suggest E. we can assume that it may, but it may or may not - what if they ate 250 mg worth of oranges?

Kudos [?]: 113 [1], given: 0

VP
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 1078

Kudos [?]: 687 [0], given: 0

Re: cr 1000 d 5 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Feb 2008, 08:20
gmat blows wrote:
marcodonzelli wrote:
A nutritionist studying the effects of massive doses of vitamin C found that of a group of 600 people who regularly took 1,500 mg of vitamin C daily for a year, fewer than 9 percent suffered serious cases of flu; of a group of 600 people who took 250 mg of vitamin C (the standard recommended daily allowance) daily for a year, 34 percent suffered at least one serious case of flu; and of a group of 600 people who took no vitamin C for a year (other than that found in the foods in a balanced diet), 32 percent suffered at least one serious case of flu.
Which of the following hypotheses is best supported by the evidence above?
(A) The effectiveness of vitamin C in preventing serious cases of flu increases in direct proportion to the amount of vitamin C taken.
(B) Vitamin C is helpful in preventing disease.
(C) Doses of vitamin C that exceed the standard recommended daily allowance by 500 percent will reduce the incidence of serious cases of flu by 25 percent.
(D) Massive doses of vitamin C can help to prevent serious case of flu.
(E) A balanced diet contains less than 250 mg of vitamin C.

I say D. the tone in C is too extreme with the use of 'will' and there is nothing in the passage to suggest E. we can assume that it may, but it may or may not - what if they ate 250 mg worth of oranges?

it is D

Kudos [?]: 687 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Posts: 114

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

Re: cr 1000 d 5 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Feb 2008, 09:29
I'll go with B

it's the only one that, in my view, can be concluded without arguing over the definition of "massive" or assuming "A balanced diet contains less than 250 mg of vitamin C".

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3583

Kudos [?]: 4661 [1], given: 360

Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Re: cr 1000 d 5 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Feb 2008, 09:46
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
D

A nutritionist studying the effects of massive doses of vitamin C found that of a group of 600 people who regularly took 1,500 mg of vitamin C daily for a year, fewer than 9 percent suffered serious cases of flu; of a group of 600 people who took 250 mg of vitamin C (the standard recommended daily allowance) daily for a year, 34 percent suffered at least one serious case of flu; and of a group of 600 people who took no vitamin C for a year (other than that found in the foods in a balanced diet), 32 percent suffered at least one serious case of flu.

Which of the following hypotheses is best supported by the evidence above?

(A) The effectiveness of vitamin C in preventing serious cases of flu increases in direct proportion to the amount of vitamin C taken. - irrelevant
(B) Vitamin C is helpful in preventing disease. - it is not correct. Non-massive doses are not helpful. "Massive doses of vitamin C are helpful in preventing disease" would be better.
(C) Doses of vitamin C that exceed the standard recommended daily allowance by 500 percent will reduce the incidence of serious cases of flu by 25 percent. - 25% is wrong and it is an strange hypothesis: what about 24%? or 24,8%? Also we have not precise data here: "suffered at least one" vs. "non-suffered" in the passage and "the number of cases" in this hypothesis.
(D) Massive doses of vitamin C can help to prevent serious case of flu. - the best. "Massive" sounds good because it comes form the passage: "A nutritionist studying the effects of massive doses of vitamin C..."
(E) A balanced diet contains less than 250 mg of vitamin C. - we cannot conclude it from the passage. In the passage 1500mg. 250mg are "extra" doses of vitamin C rather than "total" ones.
_________________

HOT! GMAT TOOLKIT 2 (iOS) / GMAT TOOLKIT (Android) - The OFFICIAL GMAT CLUB PREP APP, a must-have app especially if you aim at 700+ | PrepGame

Kudos [?]: 4661 [1], given: 360

Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Jan 2007
Posts: 439

Kudos [?]: 69 [1], given: 0

Location: Earth
Re: cr 1000 d 5 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Feb 2008, 22:15
1
KUDOS
I go for B.

Next best for me wad D.

But word "prevent" is to strong conclusion. Likely to prevent could have done it for me.

What is OA?

Kudos [?]: 69 [1], given: 0

Director
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
Posts: 780

Kudos [?]: 189 [1], given: 0

Re: cr 1000 d 5 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Feb 2008, 02:23
1
KUDOS
Given:
1. 600 people 1500mg < 9%
2. 600 people 250mg 34 %
3. 600 people diet 32%

(A) The effectiveness of vitamin C in preventing serious cases of flu increases in direct proportion to the amount of vitamin C taken. (Not really – from 2 and 1, it is not proportion – eliminate it)

(B) Vitamin C is helpful in preventing disease. (Yes, but only flu is mentioned as part of the argument – eliminate it)

(C) Doses of vitamin C that exceed the standard recommended daily allowance by 500 percent will reduce the incidence of serious cases of flu by 25 percent. (Will reduce – conclusion, but for hypothesis, this is extreme – eliminate it)

(D) Massive doses of vitamin C can help to prevent serious case of flu.(From 1 it is clear – hold it)

(E) A balanced diet contains less than 250 mg of vitamin C. (May be true – but that’s not what the passage about – eliminate it)

Kudos [?]: 189 [1], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3583

Kudos [?]: 4661 [0], given: 360

Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Re: cr 1000 d 5 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Feb 2008, 02:59
hanumayamma wrote:
(B) Vitamin C is helpful in preventing disease. (Yes, but only flu is mentioned as part of the argument – eliminate it)

Good explanation
+1
_________________

HOT! GMAT TOOLKIT 2 (iOS) / GMAT TOOLKIT (Android) - The OFFICIAL GMAT CLUB PREP APP, a must-have app especially if you aim at 700+ | PrepGame

Kudos [?]: 4661 [0], given: 360

Intern
Joined: 05 Sep 2007
Posts: 41

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Re: cr 1000 d 5 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Feb 2008, 14:03
In the answer choices given, how do you distinguish between 'must be true' and 'inference' types?

Thanks a lot.

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3583

Kudos [?]: 4661 [0], given: 360

Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Re: cr 1000 d 5 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Feb 2008, 14:12
varunk wrote:
In the answer choices given, how do you distinguish between 'must be true' and 'inference' types?

Thanks a lot.

In GMAT CR 'inference' means only 'must be true'. It was my mistake a few posts ago .

11-t59655
11-t59657
_________________

HOT! GMAT TOOLKIT 2 (iOS) / GMAT TOOLKIT (Android) - The OFFICIAL GMAT CLUB PREP APP, a must-have app especially if you aim at 700+ | PrepGame

Kudos [?]: 4661 [0], given: 360

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10145

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Re: A nutritionist studying the effects of massive doses of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Sep 2015, 11:13
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Re: A nutritionist studying the effects of massive doses of   [#permalink] 27 Sep 2015, 11:13
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# A nutritionist studying the effects of massive doses of

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.