Hi
avigutman – thank you for following up
avigutman
No, we don't need to know their age at immigration. I'll try to explain:
Would you agree that, all else being equal, a 50 year-old has a higher probability of reaching age 80 than does a 20 year-old?
Are we comparing a :
50-year-old immigrant vs a
20-year-old immigrant. (the immigrant is coming from
OTHER parts of the Bellaria)?
If so, I don’t agree to the above statement
A
50-year-old immigrant and
a 20-year-old immigrant (from
OTHER parts of the Bellaria) will both die at
70 years in equal probability.
avigutman
For that reason, when a population gets an influx of old people, that's going to push the average lifespan upward. The incoming population of old people won't contribute any young deaths, by definition. No infant mortality, no soldiers dying at war, etc. These old people have already avoided all of the deaths that could have occurred to them earlier in life. Florida is a classic example of this, as people move there to retire. It makes it seem as though living in Florida will help you live longer, but that's classic survivorship bias.
I agree this is true in the real life. But i don't see the point of this. The argument is all about comparing two fundamentally different groups
Group A -
not forced to live physically active lifestyles
Group B - forced to live physically active lifestyle.
If old people (from
Group A) immigrate to WISTAR, they should still die at
70 years oldavigutman
jabhatta2
I thought (c) strengthened because it eliminated an alternative cause
Per the above – I have ‘eliminated’ IMMIGRANTS to WISTAR as the reason for why there is an age gap (at death)
Hence I eliminated an alternative cause (by ruling out immigrants as the cause for the age gap).
It was
you,
jabhatta2, who eliminated this potential alternate explanation, by using a premise from the argument. Answer choice (C) wasn't the one who eliminated it, therefore (C) is not a strengthener.
Not sure I understand this.
Yes I took information from (C)+ inference from the premises TO DETERMINE (c) was a strengthener.
One way to strengthen is to ‘eliminate’ an alternative cause.
I ruled out an alternative cause by ruling out ‘immigrants’ to WISTAR