louisinau
I am still a little confused with the way the comparison was made. In the right sentence, I was looking for a person who can parallel with Phileas Fogg. If it were written like " the exploit included a record that NB cicrled the globe faster than Phileas Fogg", it would make more sense to me.
I dont doubt the correctness of the right answer but I am not sure if this sytle of comparison was made common?
The comparison is not between Nellie Bly and Phineas Fogg. The comparison is between how fast Nellie Bly circled the globe and how fast Phileas Fogg circled the globe.
See this sentence:
His talents include running faster than Usain Bolt [DOES]. The DOES in the sentence is implied but not present. The comparison is similar to the comparison in Answer (B).
What the sentence means: "running faster than Usain Bolt" is one of his talents.
Here is a simplified version of the sentence we get with (B):
The exploits of Nellie Bly included circling the globe faster than Phileas Fogg [DID].Again, the DID is implied but not present.
What this means: "circling the globe faster than Phileas Fogg" was one of Nellie Bly's achievements.
Does this help to clear your doubt?