Summer is Coming! Join the Game of Timers Competition to Win Epic Prizes. Registration is Open. Game starts Mon July 1st.

It is currently 20 Jul 2019, 11:30

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
P
Joined: 10 Apr 2018
Posts: 270
Location: United States (NC)
A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Oct 2018, 22:35
1
8
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

59% (02:11) correct 41% (02:16) wrong based on 415 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics


A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the company's failure to slow production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investor's sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case it is clearly not justified. It is true that an increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burton's case it indicates no such thing. Rather, the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?


A. The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states the conclusion.

B. The first states the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states an intermediate conclusion that is drawn in order to support that conclusion

C. The first is the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence against the position being opposed.

D. The first states an intermediate conclusion that is drawn in order to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole

E. The first & second both state intermediate conclusions that are drawn in order to support jointly the conclusions of the argument as a whole


Similar Questions :
1.https://gmatclub.com/forum/a-prominent-investor-who-holds-a-large-stake-in-the-burton-tool-compan-10451.html

2.https://gmatclub.com/forum/a-prominent-investor-who-holds-a-large-stake-in-the-burton-tool-compan-268927.html

_________________
Probus

~You Just Can't beat the person who never gives up~ Babe Ruth
examPAL Representative
User avatar
P
Joined: 07 Dec 2017
Posts: 1073
Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Oct 2018, 01:31
1
The answer is B.

We can solve this question using the

PRECISE

method - i.e.  analysing the given information to get to the answer on our own.
The first boldfaced section is clearly phrased as a conclusion ("justified" being a judgemental word), and it is a refutation of the argument which has just been put forward - thus, it is the argument's main conclusion.
The second boldfaced section is also, clearly, a conclusion ("indicates" being our main clue), but what is its relation to the first one? well, the structure (" it is true... but") and context (coming right ofter the previous boldface) of the sentence tells us this is a detailing of the precious conclusion - that is, it is a supporting conclusion.
Quickly skimming the answer, we see B is our answer.
_________________
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
P
Joined: 10 Apr 2018
Posts: 270
Location: United States (NC)
A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Oct 2018, 09:39
1
Hi,

Statement 1:A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the company's failure to slow production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. { A claim + evidence}

Statement 2: It is doubtful whether an investor's sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, { Authors's opinion}

Statement 3: but in this case it is clearly not justified. { Authors's opinion}

Statement 4: It is true that an increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, { General Principle / fact}

Statement 5: but in Burton's case it indicates no such thing. { Authors's opinion}

Statement 6: Rather, the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers. {Fact}


What is the main point of the argument.

let's see

Statement 1: A investor has claimed something based on certain evidence . ( Claim +evidence Sets the context of the argument)

Then the author responds by saying

Statement 2:hey, its true that increase inventory indicates production is more than demand ( Author presents a fact about investors claim +evidence}

Statement 3:but in the this case increase in inventory is because of the orders that have been assigned to certain customers ( Author Presents evidence against the claim made by investor - This is Fact )

Statement 4:hence in this case it does not indicate that increase in inventory means production is more than demand. ( Author make a conclusion from the above evidence)

Statement 5:Author then says it doubtful weather investors criticism of management can be counterproductive ( Author then presents general opinion about investors criticism )

Statement 6:but in this case investor is clearly not justified to doubt the company . ( Author finally concludes this on the basis of Statement 2,3,4, - Main Conclusion )


Statement 4 is our BF-2 and Statement 6 is our BF-1

So we can say that BF-2 is a conclusion that author has used to support the main the conclusion , BF-1 is the main conclusion of the argument.

Looking at answer choices we see B fits the bill.


Probus
_________________
Probus

~You Just Can't beat the person who never gives up~ Babe Ruth
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 27 Nov 2015
Posts: 124
GMAT ToolKit User
A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Dec 2018, 23:31
1
A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the company's failure to slow production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investor's sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case it is clearly not justified. It is true that an increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burton's case it indicates no such thing. Rather, the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A. The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states the conclusion.

B.The 1st states the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states an intermediate conclusion that is drawn in order to support that conclusion

C.The 1st is the position that the argument as a whole opposes;the second provides evidence against the position being opposed.

D.The first states an intermediate conclusion that is drawn in order to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the 2nd states the conclusion of the argument as a whole

E. The 1st & the 2nd both state intermediate conclusions that are drawn in order to support jointly the conclusions of the argument as a whole.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 03 Jul 2018
Posts: 7
CAT Tests
Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Dec 2018, 14:31
Hello, if any could please explain how the answer is B / how to best identify conclusions for the argument as a whole vs. intermediate conclusions in these types of questions, it would be much appreciated. Thanks
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 15 Nov 2017
Posts: 54
Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Dec 2018, 15:32
I would also like to request insight into this one. How is B the OA? Thank you!

Posted from my mobile device
CR & LSAT Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: He came. He saw. He conquered. -- Studying for the LSAT -- Corruptus in Extremis
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Posts: 668
Location: United States (MA)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Reviews Badge
Re: A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Dec 2018, 17:57
Merged posts. nausherwan, please search before posting.
_________________
D-Day: November 18th, 2017

My CR Guide: https://gmatclub.com/forum/mod-nightblade-s-quick-guide-to-proficiency-cr-295316.html

Want to be a moderator? We may want you to be one! See how here: https://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-club-moderators-directory-253455.html

Need a laugh and a break? Go here: https://gmatclub.com/forum/mental-break-funny-videos-270269.html

Need a CR tutor? PM me!
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 29 Oct 2015
Posts: 173
A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Apr 2019, 00:12
Probus wrote:
A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged, citing as evidence the company's failure to slow production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products. It is doubtful whether an investor's sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case it is clearly not justified. It is true that an increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burton's case it indicates no such thing. Rather, the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?


A. The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states the conclusion.

B. The first states the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states an intermediate conclusion that is drawn in order to support that conclusion

C. The first is the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence against the position being opposed.

D. The first states an intermediate conclusion that is drawn in order to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole

E. The first & second both state intermediate conclusions that are drawn in order to support jointly the conclusions of the argument as a whole


Similar Questions :
1.https://gmatclub.com/forum/a-prominent-investor-who-holds-a-large-stake-in-the-burton-tool-compan-10451.html

2.https://gmatclub.com/forum/a-prominent-investor-who-holds-a-large-stake-in-the-burton-tool-compan-268927.html



Please note the flow of the information in the question stem...

It is true that an increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand, but in Burton's case it indicates no such thing.

It is true that an increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand" --> provides a context

but in Burton's case it indicates no such thing ---> intermediate conclusion...


Since it does not indicate any such thing (that an increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand)

the main conclusion follows...i.e
in this case it is clearly not justified.[/b]

Option B states the same and is correct.

Please give me kudo s if you liked my explanation....
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 21 Jul 2018
Posts: 177
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Social Entrepreneurship
A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 May 2019, 05:24
(Counter-conclusion) A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool company has recently claimed that the company is mismanaged,

(Counter-premise) …citing as evidence the company's failure to slow production in response to a recent rise in its inventory of finished products.

(Main Conclusion) It is doubtful whether an investor's sniping at management can ever be anything other than counterproductive, but in this case it is clearly not justified.

(Premise) It is true that an increased inventory of finished products often indicates that production is outstripping demand,

(Intermediate Conclusion) but in Burton's case it indicates no such thing.

(Premise) Rather, the increase in inventory is entirely attributable to products that have already been assigned to orders received from customers.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?


A. The first provides evidence to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states the conclusion.
The first is the main conclusion, not evidence. The second is an intermediate conclusion.

B. The first states the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states an intermediate conclusion that is drawn in order to support that conclusion.
The first half is true. Is the second an intermediate conclusion? Yes. How can we tell? We say say that “Because Burton’s case indicates no such thing, therefore, the investor’s claim is clearly not justified.”

C. The first is the position that the argument as a whole opposes; the second provides evidence against the position being opposed.
No, the first is for the argument and the second is also for the argument. This answer choice says the first is an opposing position, which it isn’t.

D. The first states an intermediate conclusion that is drawn in order to support the conclusion of the argument as a whole; the second states the conclusion of the argument as a whole.
No, the first is the main conclusion.

E. The first & second both state intermediate conclusions that are drawn in order to support jointly the conclusions of the argument as a whole
Where is the joint conclusion? The first is the MAIN conclusion.

_________________
.
"What you do in practice determines your level of success. I used to tell my players: You have to give 100% everyday. Whatever you don't give, you can't make it up tomorrow."
GMAT Club Bot
A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan   [#permalink] 29 May 2019, 05:24
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A prominent investor who holds a large stake in the Burton Tool compan

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne