Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Join our live webinar and learn how to approach Data Sufficiency and Critical Reasoning problems, how to identify the best way to solve each question and what most people do wrong.
From Dec 5th onward, American programs will start releasing R1 decisions. Chat Rooms: We have also assigned chat rooms for every school so that applicants can stay in touch and exchange information/update during decision period.
A proposal has been made to trim the horns from rhinoceroses to discou
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 02 Nov 2018, 00:42
3
31
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
35% (medium)
Question Stats:
66% (00:49) correct 34% (00:57) wrong based on 1682 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
A proposal has been made to trim the horns from rhinoceroses to discourage poachers; the question is whether tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses after their horns are trimmed.
(A) whether tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses after their horns are
(B) whether tourists will continue to visit game parks to see one once their horns are
(C) whether tourists will continue to visit game parks to see rhinoceroses once the animals’ horns have been
(D) if tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses once the animals’ horns are
(E) if tourists will continue to visit game parks to see one after the animals’ horns have been
Verbal Question of The Day: Day 262: Sentence Correction
Subscribe to GMAT Question of the Day:E-mail | RSS For All QOTD Questions Click Here
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4567
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: A proposal has been made to trim the horns from rhinoceroses to discou
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Mar 2011, 04:10
24
9
The difference between ‘have been trimmed’ and ‘are trimmed’ is that trimming is a one –time job and not a daily chore. An event that was done in the past and which or whose effect is still carried through the present will have to be expressed in present perfect, while daily chores will have to be verbed with just present tense. So 'have been trimmed' is the preferred expression
_________________
you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote No one knows this better than a GMAT student does. Narendran +9198845 44509
Re: A proposal has been made to trim the horns from rhinoceroses to
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Apr 2018, 10:59
11
2
Quote:
(A) whether tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses after their horns are
(A) has a couple of subtle little problems. For starters, I don’t think the phrase “…will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses…” is quite right in this case. Grammatically, it’s fine: “visit” and “see” are parallel verbs. Trouble is, that suggests that the two actions are somehow equally weighted, and not necessarily related: tourists visit game parks, and tourists see rhinos, but maybe not at the same time.
So the phrasing in (A) isn't WRONG, exactly, but it’s not ideal: the intent of the sentence is to question whether tourists will continue to visit game parks TO SEE rhinos. And we have that option in some of the other answer choices.
You could also argue that the pronoun “their” is potentially ambiguous. It could refer to the rhinos or the tourists or the poachers, and only the rhinos would make sense, since tourists and poachers rarely trim their own horns. And again, pronoun ambiguity isn’t an absolute rule (more on that in this video), but we’ll have better options in a moment.
If you wanted to be conservative, you could keep (A), but the problems in (A) will be fixed in another answer choice.
Quote:
(B) whether tourists will continue to visit game parks to see one once their horns are
(B) includes the phrase “visit game parks to see [a rhino]…”, and that makes more sense than the parallel structure we saw in (A).
Trouble is, now the pronouns are worse. You could argue that “one” is a little bit ambiguous because it’s so far from “rhinoceroses”, but I can live with that – I don’t think it’s unclear, even if it isn’t awesome. But the “their” is definitely an issue: the nearest plurals are “game parks” and “tourists”, and neither of those are likely to have their horns trimmed. “Their” logically needs to refer to “rhinoceroses”, but that word is a long way from the pronoun now. That’s not cool.
So (B) is out.
Quote:
(C) whether tourists will continue to visit game parks to see rhinoceroses once the animals’ horns have been
(C) fixes all of the problems and imperfections of (A) and (B). We have “…continue to visit game parks to see rhinoceroses…”, and that’s better than the parallel version in (A). The pronoun has been completely removed, so now we have “once the animals’ horns have been trimmed” – and that’s clear as a bell.
Let’s keep (C).
Quote:
(D) if tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses once the animals’ horns are
(D) has the same parallelism problem as (A): “visit game parks and see rhinos” makes less sense than “visit game parks TO see rhinos.” See the explanation for (A) for more on this issue.
The GMAT also tends to frown on the use of “if” in situations like these. The GMAT seems to think that “if” can only be used for “if/then” (conditional) statements, but NOT for situations like this sentence, when the intent is just to indicate that two different alternatives are possible (e.g., visiting vs. not visiting game parks). I think that’s a silly thing for the GMAT to test, but who cares what I think?
The shorter version: if you’re given a choice between “if” and “whether” on the GMAT, then you’ll almost certainly want to choose “whether.”
So (D) is out.
Quote:
(E) if tourists will continue to visit game parks to see one after the animals’ horns have been
The only major problem in (E) is the use of “if.” See (D) for more on that issue.
So (E) is gone, and we’re left with (C).
_________________
Need an expert reply? Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.
Schools: Cornell (Bach. of Sci.), UCLA Anderson (MBA)
Re: A proposal has been made to trim the horns from rhinoceroses to discou
[#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Dec 2009, 11:49
7
3
Generally, present perfect indicates actions that started in the past and are still going on.
An alternative use of present perfect is for things that happened in the past but are still true or for things that have ongoing effects.
Some examples: (1) We have visited Torino in November and found it lovely, though cold. This doesn't mean we are still visiting, nor that it is still November. It just means that at least once, we did visit in November, and that history is still (and will forever be) true.
(2) I have attached the documents to this cover sheet. This doesn't mean I am still stapling the papers as I write or as the sentence is read...it just means the documents are still attached.
In your OG example, "have been trimmed" should be interpreted in this way--the zoo employees may not still be trimming the horns, but the horns are still short.
_________________
Emily Sledge | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | St. Louis
Re: A proposal has been made to trim the horns from rhinoceroses to discou
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Jan 2011, 15:00
2
I answered it in another way: The question to me is much rather whether "tourists come to the park and see rhinoceroses" or whether "tourists come to the park to see rhinoceroses". I think this answer (C) conveys the message much better and resolves the pronoun problem (their) as well.
_________________
Re: A proposal has been made to trim the horns from rhinoceroses to discou
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jan 2011, 03:03
6
diehard4 wrote:
21. A proposal has been made to trim the horns from rhinoceroses to discourage poachers; the question is whether tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses after their horns are trimmed. (A) whether tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses after their horns are (B) whether tourists will continue to visit game parks to see one once their horns are (C) whether tourists will continue to visit game parks to see rhinoceroses once the animals’ horns have been (D) if tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses once the animals’ horns are (E) if tourists will continue to visit game parks to see one after the animals’ horns have been
Two step process: Step 1:
Gottesschaf wrote:
I answered it in another way: The question to me is much rather whether "tourists come to the park and see rhinoceroses" or whether "tourists come to the park to see rhinoceroses". I think this answer (C) conveys the message much better
This is good thinking. For example, "I went to the store and saw Mary" means I had no intention of seeing her and she happened to be there. "I went to the store to see Mary" means I knew Mary would be at the store and the purpose of my trip was to see her. In our sentence the question is whether tourists will make a trip with the purpose of seeing the rhinos (not if the tourists will accidentally see rhinos). A and D - crossed off.
Step 2: As mentioned before, the pronoun "their" is a little ambiguous, as is the use of "one" in B and E. "One" needs to be much clearer. Here it could refer to "one" rhino or "one" horn. B and E - crossed off. Answer: C
A proposal has been made to trim the horns from rhinoceroses to discou
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Mar 2011, 17:28
A proposal has been made to trim the horns from rhinoceroses to discourage poachers; the question is whether tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses after their horns are trimmed.
A) whether tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses after their horns are B) whether tourists will continue to visit game parks to see one once their horns are C) whether tourists will continue to visit game parks to see rhinoceroses once the animals' horns have been D) if tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses once the animals' horns are E) if tourists will continue to visit game parks to see one after the animals' horns have been
OA C
All: I know that D and E can be rejected because of usage of "if"
Among A, B and C, B and A are rejected for lack of antecedents. I am not looking for the correct answer. I want to understand why "horns have been" is a correct usage. In other words, via is present perfect better than present tense ("are trimmed")
Re: A proposal has been made to trim the horns from rhinoceroses to discou
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Jul 2011, 07:33
2
1
gmat1220 wrote:
voodoochild wrote:
All: I know that D and E can be rejected because of usage of "if" Yes this is correct. whether > if on gmat
I disagree with gmat1220 with his reasoning here; sorry no-offense. AFAIK here IF is WRONG! There is no question of whether>if. That might be true in general, but I think here IF is just blatantly wrong.
As far as I understood, if is ONLY used for condition and CAN'T be used for QUESTIONS!
Experts, please let me know if you disagree with me.
daagh wrote:
The difference between ‘have been trimmed’ and ‘are trimmed’ is that trimming is a one –time job and not a daily chore. An event that was done in the past and which or whose effect is still carried through the present will have to be expressed in present perfect, while daily chores will have to be verbed with just present tense. So 'have been trimmed' is the preferred expression
Thanks for the reasoning. This clarifies the same doubt I had.
Re: A proposal has been made to trim the horns from rhinoceroses to discou
[#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Mar 2013, 10:30
1
2
Let us make a 2/3 split on this.
If V/S Whether-
'whether' is used to indicate multiple or single possibilities
'If' is used to indicate a condition
Ex1- Roger cant decide whether to play tennis or football Ex2- Roger will play if he is fit.
So, A,b,C remain. A and B there is some ambiguity. Choose C
_________________
I've failed over and over and over again in my life and that is why I succeed--Michael Jordan Kudos drives a person to better himself every single time. So Pls give it generously Wont give up till i hit a 700+
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4567
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: A proposal has been made to trim the horns from rhinoceroses to discou
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 May 2013, 05:55
1
The methodical steps to this issue may be: 1. This is question of deciding on a dilemma. Hence the conditional ‘if’ is irrelevant; dump D and E. 2. “To see” denotes the purpose of a visit and better than ‘and see’. Hence A is out. 3. To see “one” after “their” horns: the subject - pronoun number mismatch is too glaring. 4. C is the remainder IMO, the difference in the use of present perfect or present tense is rather too thin. Both are acceptable in formal writing I suppose. As in this case: - I wonder whether I can enjoy bones once my teeth are broken - is as good as - I wonder whether I can enjoy bones once my teeth have been broken - nothing much to choose from. But this is just my feeling.
_________________
you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote No one knows this better than a GMAT student does. Narendran +9198845 44509
A proposal has been made to trim the horns from rhinoceroses to discou
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Feb 2014, 08:23
8
voodoochild wrote:
A proposal has been made to trim the horns from rhinoceroses to discourage poachers; the question is whether tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses after their horns are trimmed.
A) whether tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses after their horns are B) whether tourists will continue to visit game parks to see one once their horns are C) whether tourists will continue to visit game parks to see rhinoceroses once the animals' horns have been D) if tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses once the animals' horns are E) if tourists will continue to visit game parks to see one after the animals' horns have been
OA C
All: I know that D and E can be rejected because of usage of "if"
Among A, B and C, B and A are rejected for lack of antecedents. I am not looking for the correct answer. I want to understand why "horns have been" is a correct usage. In other words, via is present perfect better than present tense ("are trimmed")
Any help is appreciated.
Hi there,
Usually, when a pronoun begins a clause, it refers to the subject of the previous clause. In this context, the subject of the previous clause is "tourists". So, even though the logical antecedent of the pronoun "they" can't be "tourists", it's better to replace the pronoun with the noun that it should refer to.
As we point out in our SC1 live session, pronoun ambiguity is sometimes considered an error on the GMAT, but sometimes an ambiguous pronoun can be in the correct answer. So, we encourage you not to use pronoun ambiguity as the only criterion to eliminate an answer choice.
In this question, there is also another way to eliminate option A. Note the difference between "visit... and see" and "visit... to see". The intended meaning of the sentence is that tourists visit the zoo in order to see the rhinos. This meaning is correctly stated by using "to" rather than "and". The part before the semicolon also makes it clear that the sentence is concerned only with rhinos, and that any other reason that tourists may visit the zoo is not part of the intended meaning of the sentence. So, "visit... to see" is correct.
Re: A proposal has been made to trim the horns from rhinoceroses to discou
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Feb 2014, 07:24
diehard4 wrote:
21. A proposal has been made to trim the horns from rhinoceroses to discourage poachers; the question is whether tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses after their horns are trimmed. (A) whether tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses after their horns are (B) whether tourists will continue to visit game parks to see one once their horns are (C) whether tourists will continue to visit game parks to see rhinoceroses once the animals’ horns have been (D) if tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses once the animals’ horns are (E) if tourists will continue to visit game parks to see one after the animals’ horns have been
As per OGThe verb following after should be the present-perfect have been trimmed to reflect that the trimming must occur before the tourists arrive.
But already the time maker after is there, so why is it necessary to use present perfect tense here
Also what is the basic difference in using whether and if? When to use if and when to use whether?
Re: A proposal has been made to trim the horns from rhinoceroses to discou
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Feb 2014, 04:12
3
1
jrashish wrote:
As per OGThe verb following after should be the present-perfect have been trimmed to reflect that the trimming must occur before the tourists arrive.
But already the time maker after is there, so why is it necessary to use present perfect tense here
Also what is the basic difference in using whether and if? When to use if and when to use whether?
Hi Ashish,
Time markers such as "before" and "after" should be used to substitute actions only when the past perfect tense is used. This rule does not apply to the present perfect tense, since this tense doesn't need two actions. The present perfect tense refers to an action that started in the past and has continued into the present. It can stand on its own without reference to any other action.
"If" should be used in "if-then" contexts: i.e., the conditional use. E.g. 'If X happens, Y will happen'. 'Whether' is used when there is a choice between two things. E.g. It is unclear whether the company will increase production. Meaning: the company may increase production, or it may not.
Re: A proposal has been made to trim the horns from rhinoceroses to discou
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Mar 2014, 17:21
I'm trying to understand significance and correctness of use of "one" in phrase "to see one after the animals' horns have been trimmed" in choice E. Sure the choice E don't sound as precise as option C. But what does "one" imply? It seems choice E says that tourists will continue to visit parks to see a rhinoceros (one of the many rhinoceroses) once the animals horns are trimmed. The phrase is generally used in spoken english. Is it correct?
Re: A proposal has been made to trim the horns from rhinoceroses to discou
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Apr 2014, 12:32
dipsy001 wrote:
I'm trying to understand significance and correctness of use of "one" in phrase "to see one after the animals' horns have been trimmed" in choice E. Sure the choice E don't sound as precise as option C. But what does "one" imply? It seems choice E says that tourists will continue to visit parks to see a rhinoceros (one of the many rhinoceroses) once the animals horns are trimmed. The phrase is generally used in spoken english. Is it correct?
Dear @dipsy001,
Thank you for posting this question. I believe you can arrive at the answer on your own. Just pay close attention to the original sentence.
A proposal has been made to trim the horns from rhinoceroses to discourage poachers; the question is whether tourists will continue to visit game parks and see rhinoceroses after their horns are trimmed.
Is the original sentence saying that the tourists will see 1 rhino or many rhinos in general?
Now look at your understanding of choice E (which by the way is correct!!). Do you think the two match?
Thus without getting into the grammatical nuances, you can eliminate choice E on the account of meaning shift from the original sentence
Re: A proposal has been made to trim the horns from rhinoceroses to discou
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Jul 2014, 01:50
Is this grammatically correct ?
See those two girls. Helen is the one on the left. here one should refer to girl. but girl is not mentioned anywhere in the sentence.But girls is mentioned.
ravi's car broke down,so he walked back to the hotel.
here he has no referent.As ravi's car is mentioned but ravi is not mentioned.
Re: A proposal has been made to trim the horns from rhinoceroses to discou
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Jul 2014, 11:40
SidKaria wrote:
Is this grammatically correct ?
See those two girls. Helen is the one on the left. here one should refer to girl. but girl is not mentioned anywhere in the sentence.But girls is mentioned.
ravi's car broke down,so he walked back to the hotel.
here he has no referent.As ravi's car is mentioned but ravi is not mentioned.
please help.
Hi Sid,
Thanks for posting your doubt here.
Although the example that you have provided is way too colloquial for GMAT, your understanding of the usage of pronoun in this one is correct. When used as a pronoun, "one" like any other pronoun must have a clear antecedent and must also agree in number with its antecedent. Hence, example one does not stand.
Your analysis of the second example is also correct. "he" must refer to "Ravi". But there is no mention of "Ravi" in the sentence. "Ravi's" acts as an adjective and hence pronoun "he" cannot refer to that entity.
Re: A proposal has been made to trim the horns from rhinoceroses to discou
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Jul 2014, 21:49
SidKaria wrote:
ravi's car broke down,so he walked back to the hotel.
here he has no referent.As ravi's car is mentioned but ravi is not mentioned.
On a separate note, it is interesting to note that there are at least a couple of examples in OG, where the pronoun in question does not have any direct referent, but still GMAT considers it acceptable. So, GMAT seems to be permissive in this regard.
Among the objects found in the excavated temple were small terra-cotta effigies left by supplicants who were either asking the goddess Bona Dea's aidin healing physical and mental ills or thanking her for such help.
This is the correct answer, though there is no explicit referent of her. The silver lining is that all 5 answer choices use her, so you don't really have to choose an option based on this.
_________________
close
66% (00:49) correct 
