Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Question: At least some volunteers who said they had acted fairly in choosing the easy task would have said that it was unfair for someone else to do so.
It is actually a CR question choice in the OG No.650. I think the tenses here "said", "had acted", "would have said" are awkward.
It makes sense that we say "who said that they had acted ...", it means the action "act" happened before the action "say" in the past.
But if we add the "would have said", it is totally different. Because, as we all know, "would have" means that something you actually didn't do in the past.
So the meaning of the original sentence is volunteers didn't say that it was unfair for someone else to do so. In fact, as the argument implied, they did so.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Question: At least some volunteers who said they had acted fairly in choosing the easy task would have said that it was unfair for someone else to do so.
It is actually a CR question choice in the OG No.650. I think the tenses here "said", "had acted", "would have said" are awkward.
It makes sense that we say "who said that they had acted ...", it means the action "act" happened before the action "say" in the past.
But if we add the "would have said", it is totally different. Because, as we all know, "would have" means that something you actually didn't do in the past.
So the meaning of the original sentence is volunteers didn't say that it was unfair for someone else to do so. In fact, as the argument implied, they did so.
Show more
IMO, "would have" constructions are hypothectical in nature. Here the prompt says that at least some of the volunteers said that they acted fairly (acting fairly is prior to saying). Now the hypothetical part -If someone had asked them then, they would have responded by saying that it was unfair for someone else to do so. So, yea it doesn't happen really. The prompt says that had this question been raised, this would have been the response. The sentence is grammatically correct.
Please hit kudos if that helped..i kinda really need them.
Question: At least some volunteers who said they had acted fairly in choosing the easy task would have said that it was unfair for someone else to do so.
It is actually a CR question choice in the OG No.650. I think the tenses here "said", "had acted", "would have said" are awkward.
It makes sense that we say "who said that they had acted ...", it means the action "act" happened before the action "say" in the past.
But if we add the "would have said", it is totally different. Because, as we all know, "would have" means that something you actually didn't do in the past.
So the meaning of the original sentence is volunteers didn't say that it was unfair for someone else to do so. In fact, as the argument implied, they did so.
IMO, "would have" constructions are hypothectical in nature. Here the prompt says that at least some of the volunteers said that they acted fairly (acting fairly is prior to saying). Now the hypothetical part -If someone had asked them then, they would have responded by saying that it was unfair for someone else to do so. So, yea it doesn't happen really. The prompt says that had this question been raised, this would have been the response. The sentence is grammatically correct.
Please hit kudos if that helped..i kinda really need them.
Show more
Thanks for your reply.
I can totally understand your explanation of the sentence. And it makes sense.
But is it grammatically correct that we omitt the "if" part in a hypothetical sentence?
I am sure that some sentences, such as "I would have told you the story, but you didn't ask me", are right without "if" part. Because "you didn't ask me" substitute the "if" part.
I am glad I could help you with your previous doubt, but I am no expert buddy I usually pull out the meaning of the sentence and act accordingly. Also you might find going through If ..then constructions useful (chapter 12 -MGMAT SC)
Question: At least some volunteers who said they had acted fairly in choosing the easy task would have said that it was unfair for someone else to do so.
It is actually a CR question choice in the OG No.650. I think the tenses here "said", "had acted", "would have said" are awkward.
It makes sense that we say "who said that they had acted ...", it means the action "act" happened before the action "say" in the past.
But if we add the "would have said", it is totally different. Because, as we all know, "would have" means that something you actually didn't do in the past.
So the meaning of the original sentence is volunteers didn't say that it was unfair for someone else to do so. In fact, as the argument implied, they did so.
I can totally understand your explanation of the sentence. And it makes sense.
But is it grammatically correct that we omitt the "if" part in a hypothetical sentence?
I am sure that some sentences, such as "I would have told you the story, but you didn't ask me", are right without "if" part. Because "you didn't ask me" substitute the "if" part.
Show more
It's okay to have a hypothetical sentence without the word 'if'. You're right, usually the word 'if' will be in there, but there's no rule that says it always has to be.
For example, these are hypotheticals that use the subjunctive tense:
I wondered what I would have done in the same situation. Steve speculated on whether he would have passed the class without extra tutoring.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.