Bunuel
Since the sentence is saying he did not seem likely to develop the reputation, we need the word "nor", limiting the choices to (B), (D), or (E).
Thank you for posting the OE. I expected it to analyse whether we should include a finite verb after an
or or not, but it doesn't do that. It simply says that
nor is correct (and by extension, that
or is wrong). I stand by my position that this question is unfair. I would like to be more direct here and say that there is no reason to say that
or is incorrect, but I am very aware of the fact that there are three expert opinions in this thread that go the other way. Here's a very quick example of what I mean:
1.
The author does not know, or prefers not to disclose, the identity of the informer.Prefers is a "complete" verb. This sentence
cannot be read as "The author does not know the identity of the informer or the author does not
prefers not to disclose the identity of the informer". This sentence is instead meant to be read as "The author does not know X OR the author prefers not to disclose X".
2.
The author does not know, or prefer to disclose, the identity of the informer.This sentence is completely different, because
prefer is not a "complete" verb here. This sentence is meant to be read as "The author does not know something AND the author does not prefer to disclose something". That
and may be a little surprising, but it's easier to see why (
or =
and) in a shorter sentence:
3.
He did not take the GMAT or apply to ISB. ← Here,
(negation) + or is read as
(negation) + and, so this sentence
~ "He did not take the GMAT
and he did not apply to ISB". That is, he did not do either of those things. It would be absurd to interpret this sentence any other way.
This doesn't happen when there is a clause on the right of an
or:
4.
He did not take the GMAT or he did not apply to ISB.(4) is a problem, but that doesn't change the fact that (3) is absolutely fine.
AndrewN
The problematic part I see with your post is that there is nothing in the way of analysis, leaving the reader to look at your response and presumably go,
Well, he got a perfect score in Verbal, so he must be right.Please don't (mis)characterise my response as... whatever you thought it was. I have never used my score to justify any of my responses, and injecting such an idea into the minds of people reading my response is not a particularly nice thing to do; disagreement should not carry such costs. This is a non-official question, and I wanted to see how the author(s) analysed the situation. That is all.
CrackVerbalGMAT
You can combine two negative ideas using
NOR with the second idea starting off with ‘nor’. You can use
OR if the second part that you want to combine is a noun, adjective, or an adverbial phrase. But, if it is a verb phrase (like in this case) without a subject, use NOR.
AndrewN
I could repeat the same grammar rules that
Akurian listed above, or I could refer you to the probable
Grammar Girl source article that explains how to properly use
nor in different contexts. The examples on page 2 of that article, "He is not interested..." fit the same mold as the sentence here.
This is simply not true. Or to be more precise, to say that we should not use an
or when we see a verb
form without a subject on the other side of the
or is, to put it very mildly, strange. A sentence like (3), for example, is absolutely fine.
emcheeks
2. (by ManhattanPrep) when you connect two negative ideas using a nor,
comma counts:
For example:
I will not clean the bathroom nor walk the dog.
This means that I will not: 1. clean the bathroom 2. not walk the dog. You just created a double negative on the second term!
As with most issues involving commas, this is their
opinion. For what it's worth, I really don't see how or why "I will not clean the bathroom nor walk the dog" is incorrect. In fact, both "I will not clean the bathroom
nor walk the dog" and "I will not clean the bathroom
or walk the dog" are correct.
I understand that as the minority view, my response may not be helpful to most people reading this thread. Here are some additional examples for anyone who did look at some of these options and wonder whether the question was fair:
5.
France did not cross the Welsh line, or ever seem likely to. (
source)
6.
... did not know or seem to care about the performance of the individual patrolmen (
source)
7.
Many do not know or seem to care what the law is. (
source)
8.
... the company was not to pressure, or even seem to pressure, the Food and Drug Administration. (
source)