The trap here is sneaky. Statement (2) looks like it's giving you new information — but it's literally just restating what the stem already told you.
When you're told P(selecting advanced) = 5/6, that means for every 6 students, 5 are advanced and 1 is a beginner. In other words, advanced:beginner = 5:1. Statement (2) says advanced:beginner = 5:1. That's... the same thing. Completely redundant. If you pick C or D here, you fell for it.
Set up the stem properly first:
1. Let advanced = 5k, beginner = k (since ratio is 5:1)
2. We need to find "a" — the number of advanced students to add so that (5k + a)/(6k + a) = 7/8
Cross-multiplying: 8(5k + a) = 7(6k + a)
40k + 8a = 42k + 7a
a = 2k
So we just need to find k to get a.
Statement (1): advanced - beginner = 44
5k - k = 44
4k = 44
k = 11
So a = 2(11) = 22. We can answer the question. Sufficient.
Statement (2): advanced:beginner = 5:1. Already knew this. Not sufficient.
Answer: A
The bigger lesson is about DS trap recognition. The GMAT sometimes embeds the same info in the stem and one of the statements. If you don't fully simplify the stem first, you'll think Statement (2) is telling you something new. I got burned by this pattern early in my prep, and now I always check: does this statement actually add information that wasn't already implied?
Anytime P(some group) = p/q in a DS stem, you've already locked in the ratio. Any statement that gives you "the ratio is X:Y" is likely redundant.
---
Founder at edskore.com | Try free adaptive diagnostic tests