I think even I had a similar doubt, the way I went about it would be - Enjoying radicchio as much as peach marmalade would not have an impact on the
5 for the price of 4 plan. It does not specify or speak about the sales but does comment on the similarity of the 'enjoyment'
B option on the other hand compares the shelf life of the two products. The assumption would be that the shelf life and the enjoyment would be the same, once the shelf life comes into the picture, it would be easy to compare them on the basis of sales and the similarities/dissimilarities in a better way than option A
This is how I went about it.
sarangadhar
this is how I thought:
I could eliminate C, D, and E. same reasons as given by vivesomnium. Next I eliminated B, thinking that we don't have any clue about shelf life based on the stimulus and becomes irrelevant. And then thought that radicchio could be sold well enough as marmalade based on A. when Consumers enjoy something, that would bring the sales anyway.
Now, coming to vivesomnium explanation:
Based on the reasoning given by vivesomnium for A, if it is true that enjoying something isn't enough for buying it, then it is also true that willingness on something isn't enough for buying it. we have more factors to buys something... So, I am kinda of not fully satisfied with this.
So, can I request for more promising explanation?