Last visit was: 28 Mar 2025, 09:01 It is currently 28 Mar 2025, 09:01
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
MasteringGMAT
Joined: 14 Feb 2022
Last visit: 10 Mar 2025
Posts: 79
Own Kudos:
2,035
 [129]
Given Kudos: 69
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Posts: 79
Kudos: 2,035
 [129]
14
Kudos
Add Kudos
113
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,477
Own Kudos:
5,437
 [23]
Given Kudos: 1,431
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,477
Kudos: 5,437
 [23]
14
Kudos
Add Kudos
9
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
nazii
Joined: 29 Oct 2021
Last visit: 12 Jan 2024
Posts: 58
Own Kudos:
49
 [1]
Given Kudos: 279
Posts: 58
Kudos: 49
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
YashYashkratos
Joined: 27 Nov 2022
Last visit: 27 Mar 2025
Posts: 85
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 17
Posts: 85
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Picked D as the correct answer

however E) says something i observed some have missed- if in the study one type of treadmill was purchased earlier does'nt it mean they were observed over a longer period of time than the non motorized treadmill ?

what is the source of the question?
User avatar
dpchen
Joined: 03 Jul 2017
Last visit: 01 Apr 2024
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
57
 [1]
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 5
Kudos: 57
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
YashYashkratos
Picked D as the correct answer

however E) says something i observed some have missed- if in the study one type of treadmill was purchased earlier does'nt it mean they were observed over a longer period of time than the non motorized treadmill ?

what is the source of the question?

The source is GMAT Prep (Focus). I encountered it on one of the free practice exams.

I picked E because of that very reason. It's reasonable that 5-year old treadmills are more likely to require repair than 1-year old treadmills, regardless of type.

In retrospect, if E had said "People who purchased new treadmills within the past year are not far more likely than people who purchased treadmills five years ago to have purchased nonmotorized treadmills" then IMO this would have been as valid as D.
User avatar
GmatKnightTutor
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 31 Jan 2020
Last visit: 27 Mar 2025
Posts: 4,796
Own Kudos:
1,484
 [1]
Given Kudos: 17
Posts: 4,796
Kudos: 1,484
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
According to a recent large-scale survey of people who had purchased new home exercise equipment during the past five years, ten percent of motorized treadmills purchased during that period had required repairs more than once, whereas only two percent of nonmotorized treadmills had ever needed repair. Therefore, people who want to buy a treadmill for regular workouts can rely on having their routine disrupted far less often if they buy a nonmotorized rather than a motorized treadmill.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. Nonmotorized treadmills provide at least as good a workout for people who use them regularly as motorized treadmills do.
B. At least as many people in the survey had purchased motorized treadmills as had purchased nonmotorized treadmills.
C. Motorized treadmills do not generally take longer to repair than nonmotorized treadmills.
D. People who have bought treadmills are not far more likely to use them regularly over the long term if they are motorized than if they are nonmotorized.
E. People who purchased new treadmills within the past year are not far more likely than people who purchased treadmills five years ago to have purchased motorized treadmills.


The passage talks about people who bought gym equipment for their homes. 10 out of 100 who bought motorized treadmills had to get them repaired multiple times. Only 2 out of 100, however, who bought non-motorized treadmills had to repair them. The theory therefore is that if you want something that doesn't interrupt your exercise routine you should get non-motorized treadmills.

We're asked to look for an assumption.

(D) is the answer. If people who bought motorized treadmills were far more likely to use them compared to non-motorized, then the chances of them getting damaged is far higher. Imagine a smartphone you buy but only use once a year. Chances are it won't get broken even if you keep it for 10 years. That doesn't necessarily mean the device itself was more solidly built.
User avatar
Guntabulla
Joined: 24 Jul 2023
Last visit: 22 Dec 2024
Posts: 24
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 24
Kudos: 54
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Was debating between B and D. Went with B for the following reason: While the question does deal with a percentage the number of each type of treadmill does still matter. It could be possible that the a smaller sample of motorized was picked but that size had a larger number of failures due to sampling bias.

Is this too much assumption for the question?
User avatar
cats
Joined: 14 Jan 2024
Last visit: 17 Jun 2024
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Location: United States
Posts: 9
Kudos: 117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Guntabulla
Was debating between B and D. Went with B for the following reason: While the question does deal with a percentage the number of each type of treadmill does still matter. It could be possible that the a smaller sample of motorized was picked but that size had a larger number of failures due to sampling bias.

Is this too much assumption for the question?
­i did the same , if anyone can answer as to why this is wrong
User avatar
MartyMurray
Joined: 11 Aug 2023
Last visit: 28 Mar 2025
Posts: 1,400
Own Kudos:
4,239
 [2]
Given Kudos: 135
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 1,400
Kudos: 4,239
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
Guntabulla
Was debating between B and D. Went with B for the following reason: While the question does deal with a percentage the number of each type of treadmill does still matter. It could be possible that the a smaller sample of motorized was picked but that size had a larger number of failures due to sampling bias.

Is this too much assumption for the question?
­Let's take a look at (B).

B. At least as many people in the survey had purchased motorized treadmills as had purchased nonmotorized treadmills.

Notice that (B) doesn't say "The number of people who purchased motorized treadmills was not tiny."

It basically says just that the number of people who purchased motorized treadmills was no less than the number who purchased nonmotorized treadmills.

So, we can't run with (B) and interpret it as saying that the number of people who purchased motorized treadmills was not tiny because that interpretation involves a new meaning that (B) doesn't have. After all, "at least as many" and "was not tiny" have quite different meanings.

Thus, while it's true that the argument relies on the assumption that the number of people who purchased motorized treadmills was not so tiny that the statistics are unreliable, since that's not what (B) says or logically implies, (B) is not a necessary assumption.
User avatar
sayan640
Joined: 29 Oct 2015
Last visit: 27 Mar 2025
Posts: 1,211
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 776
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
Products:
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
Posts: 1,211
Kudos: 672
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaB Can you please throw some more light on option B and D ? chetan2u GMATNinja
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 28 Mar 2025
Posts: 15,835
Own Kudos:
72,331
 [3]
Given Kudos: 461
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 15,835
Kudos: 72,331
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MasteringGMAT
According to a recent large-scale survey of people who had purchased new home exercise equipment during the past five years, ten percent of motorized treadmills purchased during that period had required repairs more than once, whereas only two percent of nonmotorized treadmills had ever needed repair. Therefore,cpeople who want to buy a treadmill for regular workouts can rely on having their routine disrupted far less often if they buy a nonmotorized rather than a motorized treadmill.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. Nonmotorized treadmills provide at least as good a workout for people who use them regularly as motorized treadmills do.
B. At least as many people in the survey had purchased motorized treadmills as had purchased nonmotorized treadmills.
C. Motorized treadmills do not generally take longer to repair than nonmotorized treadmills.
D. People who have bought treadmills are not far more likely to use them regularly over the long term if they are motorized than if they are nonmotorized.
E. People who purchased new treadmills within the past year are not far more likely than people who purchased treadmills five years ago to have purchased motorized treadmills.
­
Premises:
Of people who purchased treadmills in last 5 years, 
Motorized treadmills - 10% required repairs more than once
Nonmotorized treadmills -  Only 2% had ever needed repairs

Conclusion: People who want to buy a treadmill for regular workouts can rely on having their routine disrupted far less often if they buy a nonmotorized rather than a motorized treadmill.

For now, the conclusion seems to make sense. Those who want to do regular workouts (say everyday), will have their routines disturbed much less if they buy the nonmotorized one. Looks like it. After all, only 2% of them ever need repairs. But there is an assumption here. So let's look at the options. At first thought, I can't think of what the assumption may be. 

A. Nonmotorized treadmills provide at least as good a workout for people who use them regularly as motorized treadmills do.

Irrelevant. The only factor being discussed is 'routine disruption'. Whether the workout would be better or worse (whatever the parameters for measuring that is)  is not being discussed.  

B. At least as many people in the survey had purchased motorized treadmills as had purchased nonmotorized treadmills.

This is not required. We know that it was a large-scale survey. So many would have bought both types. The sampling size for one, even if it is smaller than the other, doesn't mean it is not representative. We are given large-scale so that indicates that it is representative. 
Say if it was a survey of 10,000 people and 4000 bought motorized while 6000 bought nonmotorized, does it make any difference? 
Even if we negate it and say that fewer people bought the motorized one, so what? 
The survey results talk about the percentage of repairs, not absolute values. So of 4000 motorized ones, 400 required repairs more than once. While of 6000 nonmotorized ones, barely 120 required repairs ever. 
Since we have results in percentage terms, number of treadmills is irrelevant. 

C. Motorized treadmills do not generally take longer to repair than nonmotorized treadmills.

Length of disruption is irrelevant.

D. People who have bought treadmills are not far more likely to use them regularly over the long term if they are motorized than if they are nonmotorized.

The length of use does impact the frequency of repairs.
Say of the 100 people who buy motorized one, all 100 use them regularly. Then 10% need repairs multiple times. They are getting used regularly after all. 
Say of the 100 people who buy unmotorized one, only 5 use them regularly. The rest use them for a few days and then let them stand (as we know happens very often with treadmills!). Then the 95 will obviously never need repairs if they are not getting used or used rarely. Of 5, if 2 go for repairs, that is 40%. Suddenly the unmotorized ones don't look so good. 
If people are far more likley to use the motorized ones regularly, then we would expect more frequent repairs for them.

Negate it:  People who have bought treadmills are far more likely to use them regularly over the long term if they are motorized than if they are nonmotorized.

Notice the use of "far more likely". This is a hint that the author is looking at an extreme difference as taken in the example. Our conclusion breaks here. 

E. People who purchased new treadmills within the past year are not far more likely than people who purchased treadmills five years ago to have purchased motorized treadmills.

There is no comparison between "one year ago" and "5 years ago" hence this is irrelevant. 

Answer (D)

Discussion on Assumption Questions: https://youtu.be/O0ROJfljRLU
A Hard Assumption Question: https://youtu.be/0j4tovGifIg

 
User avatar
Blackcrow1972
Joined: 04 Jun 2024
Last visit: 24 Mar 2025
Posts: 67
Own Kudos:
100
 [1]
Given Kudos: 40
Posts: 67
Kudos: 100
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Why Option D Is Essential to the Argument:
If motorized treadmills are used far more regularly over the long term, their higher repair rate might simply reflect their more frequent usage, not their inherent lack of reliability. In that case, the evidence about repair rates would not justify the conclusion that nonmotorized treadmills are better for avoiding disruptions to regular workouts.

By assuming Option D is true (that usage frequency is not significantly different between motorized and nonmotorized treadmills), the argument ensures that the higher repair rate of motorized treadmills is due to their design or mechanical complexity, not their increased use. This makes the conclusion valid.

If Option D Were False:
If people use motorized treadmills far more regularly, the argument would fail because the higher repair rate could simply be a function of greater wear and tear from higher usage. In that case:

Nonmotorized treadmills might appear more reliable, but only because they are used less, not because they are inherently better at avoiding disruptions.
User avatar
johnm2
Joined: 28 Sep 2024
Last visit: 17 Jan 2025
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 5
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thought the same exact thing, that and D is written so abstrusely that it fails to make much sense at all
Guntabulla
Was debating between B and D. Went with B for the following reason: While the question does deal with a percentage the number of each type of treadmill does still matter. It could be possible that the a smaller sample of motorized was picked but that size had a larger number of failures due to sampling bias.

Is this too much assumption for the question?
User avatar
JuniqueLid
Joined: 04 Feb 2025
Last visit: 28 Mar 2025
Posts: 39
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 269
Products:
Posts: 39
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thank you Marty. I understand the rationale for D to be the right answer, however, would appreciate some further clarification.

I learnt that one method to test for assumptions is seeing if the opposite of an answer option breaks the conclusion, if it does, then the conclusion relies on the choice as an assumption. In this case, the opposite of D would be "people who bought motorised are more likely to use them regularly" - if this was true, then having motorised treadmils that are more prone to breakdowns will certainly have their routine disrupted. This supports the conclusion that people with a regular workout routine should choose nonmotorised over motorised - more so for those who workout even more regularly! Since the opposite of D didn't break the assumption, D is not a necessary assumption that the conclusion depends on.

I think the main difference in this thinking, compared to yours, is on what is the conclusion of the passage. Yours is that "motorised are less reliable" vs. the above is "people with regular workout routines should choose nomotorised over motorised" on the premises that "nonmotorised is less likely to disrupt their routines due to downtime". The former seems more of an interim conclusion, which leads to the latter final and main conclusion. What's the issue in this thinking?

Thank you very much.
MartyTargetTestPrep
According to a recent large-scale survey of people who had purchased new home exercise equipment during the past five years, ten percent of motorized treadmills purchased during that period had required repairs more than once, whereas only two percent of nonmotorized treadmills had ever needed repair. Therefore, people who want to buy a treadmill for regular workouts can rely on having their routine disrupted far less often if they buy a nonmotorized rather than a motorized treadmill.

We see that the passage presents a scenario in which a greater percentage of motorized treadmills than of nonmotorized treadmills needed repair.

Then, the question asks the following:

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

The argument supports the following conclusion:

people who want to buy a treadmill for regular workouts can rely on having their routine disrupted far less often if they buy a nonmotorized rather than a motorized treadmill

The support for the conclusion is the following:

According to a recent large-scale survey ... ten percent of motorized treadmills purchased during that period (the past five years) had required repairs more than once, whereas only two percent of nonmotorized treadmills had ever needed repair.

Let's now go to the answer choices.

A. Nonmotorized treadmills provide at least as good a workout for people who use them regularly as motorized treadmills do.

This choice supports the wrong conclusion. The conclusion of this argument is about people "having their routine disrupted far less often." That conclusion does not depend on nonmotorized treadmills providing at least as good a workout as motorized ones.

Eliminate.

B. At least as many people in the survey had purchased motorized treadmills as had purchased nonmotorized treadmills.

This choice is irrelevant. Notice that the support for the conclusion involves percentages of treadmills that required repairs. Those percentages would presumably be the same and have the same implications regardless of how many of each type of treadmill were purchased.

In other words, regardless of what number of people purchased either kind of treadmill, the percentages will indicate the same probability that one type or the other will need repairs.

Eliminate.

C. Motorized treadmills do not generally take longer to repair than nonmotorized treadmills.

This choice goes in the wrong direction. After all, if, contrary to what this choice says, motorized treadmills DO generally take longer to repair than nonmotorized treadmills, then people who use motorized treadmills will have their routines disrupted by not only a greater number of incidents involving repairs but also longer periods of time needed for repairs. Thus, if this choice were not true, then the argument would be even more convincing.

So, clearly, the argument does not depend on this choice.

Eliminate.

D. People who have bought treadmills are not far more likely to use them regularly over the long term if they are motorized than if they are nonmotorized.

This choice may seem irrelevant. However, if we consider this choice carefully, we see that it introduces another factor that matters.

After all, if people who have bought treadmills ARE far more likely to use them regularly over the long term if they are motorized than if they are nonmotorized, then maybe the reason why motorized treadmills need repairs more often is that people are using them more regularly.

So, if this choice were NOT true, then the argument would fall apart because, in that case, the evidence provided would no longer support the conclusion. Rather, it could be the case that, even though motorized treadmills need repairs more often, they are not less reliable than nonmotorized treadmills. They just get used more.

Keep.

E. People who purchased new treadmills within the past year are not far more likely than people who purchased treadmills five years ago to have purchased motorized treadmills.

This choice has no effect on the argument. The argument is based on the differences in the percentages of the two types of treadmills needing repairs. The proportions of the different types of treadmills purchased does not affect the support provided by that evidence about the percentages needing repairs.

After all, the fact that the proportion of people purchasing a type of treadmill increased or didn't increase has no bearing on whether that type of treadmill is or is not more reliable than another type.

Eliminate.

Answer: (D)
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7266 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
233 posts