Taulark1
egmat , Here how is there a parallelism issue in option E ? aren't both X and Y clauses in the structure as likely X as Y in option E?
Hey
Taulark1Happy to help.
Choice E is more a test of meaning analysis than of parallelism. Let's take a closer look at E.
E: According to a recent study,
it is four times as likely
that retirees in the United States will give their children regular financial aid as they are to receive it from them.
Now, I'm sure you're familiar with the placeholder pronoun 'it'. The
Placeholder or Dummy Pronoun "it" either does not refer to any tangible noun:
For example: It is raining.
...or it refers to noun placed later in the sentence in the form of a Dependent Clause, a to-verb phrase, etc.
For example: It is known to all of us that Tony failed his test.
Now, let's apply this second example above to our official question choice E.
The pronoun "it" is a placeholder that refers to the idea conveyed by the that-clause. In other words, "
that retirees in the United States will give their children regular financial aid" is
four times as likely as something else.
Now, ask yourself, what is the intended meaning? The author wishes to discuss the likelihood of what exactly?
Is the fact that "retirees in the United States will give their children regular financial aid" likely or probably true?
Or, are retirees more likely to give their children regular financial aid?
Clearly, it is the latter. This why choice E is illogical and a distortion of the intended meaning.
I hope this improves your understanding.
Happy Learning!
Abhishek