sudeep
According to the teachings of the Buddhist and Hindu religions,
attaining nirvana is to enter a state of supreme liberation, leaving behind the desires that perpetuate the cycle of death and rebirth.
(A) attaining nirvana is to enter
(B) to attain nirvana is entering
(C) to attain nirvana is
(D) to attain nirvana is to enter
(E) attaining nirvana is to be entering
OE:
“Attaining” and “to enter”must be parallel. (D) gives
this to you, with “to attain” and “to enter.”
Not sold on "D" here. What is the source of this question?
My instinct certainly told me to pick that answer choice since it is idiomatic, but I picked A and here is why:
"according to the teachings of.." needs a subject to work with. It is modifying the upcoming noun. "Attaining nirvana" is a noun and therefore it makes sense. Also, it seems that the parallelism is forced in the explanation. The modifier "leaving behind the desires..." is just that--a modifier! It is a consequence of attaining nirvana.
Let me give an example to illustrate this better:
"According to the latest research, eating a whole foods plant based diet leads to a better body, eradicating heart disease."
Now, in the sentence above "Eating a whole foods plant based diet" is the subject and it is being appropriately modified by both "according to the..." and "eradicating heart disease." Also, it is perfectly clear that there is no parallelism going on here. Another way to write the sentence would be:
"Eating a whole foods plant based diet, according to the latest research, leads to a better body, eradicating heart disease."
Admittedly the sentence is more confusing to parse than the original, however one can see that there is no parallelism happening in the sentence.
I just really want to draw attention to the fact that parallelism seems forced in the original explanation, and I would seriously consider the source of the question before accepting the answer choice.
edit: hahaahahaha. Never mind. I misread the explanation. The parallelism is between "attaining" and "entering"! The answer makes sense with that context.