Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 04:21 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 04:21
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
555-605 Level|   Clauses|   Meaning/Logical Predication|   Pronouns|                  
User avatar
ashardeep128
Joined: 10 Dec 2022
Last visit: 13 Jan 2024
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 132
WE:Brand Management (Advertising and PR)
Posts: 3
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
facdan
Joined: 05 Feb 2023
Last visit: 25 Nov 2023
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 7
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
8,563
 [1]
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,563
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
thangvietnam
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Last visit: 09 Mar 2023
Posts: 768
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,198
Posts: 768
Kudos: 418
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EducationAisle
Rocket7
If simple past then condition will have Simple past or use of would. is this rule correct?
Hi Rocket7, both can be correct, in specific contexts.

i) Condition in simple past, followed by simple past: In ancient Egypt, if a person committed crime, he was stoned. (both events happening in the past, depicting a generally true condition in the past)

ii) Condition in simple past, followed by usage of would: Jack realized that if he did not work hard, he would fail. (Prediction of future, made in the past)

Quote:
If the above said if-then rule for simple Past is correct then can anyone explain why option A and Option E are wrong.
The context here conforms to prediction of future, made in the past (their grip on Algeria would never be secure). Hence, option A (Condition in simple past, followed by simple past) is not correct.

You would notice that E is just needlessly an inverted conditional.

p.s. Our book EducationAisle Sentence Correction Nirvana discusses Hypothetical Conditional, its application and examples in significant detail. If someone is interested, PM me your email-id; I can mail the corresponding section.

thank you, expert.
this is great explanation of two forms . I can say that conditional sentence which display a fact is form 1 . but conditional sentence which show a hypothetical situation is in form 2.

other conditional sentence is " if did.. would do" and " if had done... would have done". these are conditional sentence which display a hypothetical situation which is unlikely in present and in past

in short, there is only one condidtional sentence which show a general truth. it is in the form " if do ... do".

thank you expert again.
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,195
Own Kudos:
4,765
 [1]
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,195
Kudos: 4,765
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
facdan
E-GMAT and GMAT NINJA I am begging you to tell me the difference between B and E. They use the same pronouns and convey the same meaning. I am confused

Posted from my mobile device

Hello facdan,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, Option E is inferior to Option B because it is needlessly indirect and wordy, making it awkward and redundant.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
rishabhchats
Joined: 30 Jul 2022
Last visit: 17 Jun 2025
Posts: 6
Given Kudos: 433
Posts: 6
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja
ashardeep128
GMATNinja, can you please help with the explanation?
Quote:
(A) Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was also of interest to the French throughout the first half of the twentieth century because they assumed that if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure.
The first thing I notice here is the "if" construction. Because we're introducing a conditional scenario, we need "would" in the second part of that construction.

    "If Tim forgot to study, he would fail the test."

That's fine. Here we see the consequences Tim would face if he didn't study.

    "If Tim forgot to study, he failed the test."

Not fine! Now it seems like Tim actually failed. But if Tim actually failed, why is this whole sentence framed with the conditional "if?" That's a problem.

(A) is more like the second example. We get "was," making it sound like the grip was actually insecure, as opposed to conveying what would be true in a hypothetical situation.

So (A) is out.

Quote:
(B) Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was also of interest to the French throughout the first half of the twentieth century because they assumed that without it their grip on Algeria would never be secure.
Looks good. Now we get the conditional "would," so the main problem in (A) is fixed.

And of the pronouns here all seem to point to something logical. "It" is "the Strait of Gibraltar." "They" refers to "the French." So let's hold on to (B).

Quote:
(C) Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was also of interest to the French throughout the first half of the twentieth century because they assumed that their grip on Algeria was not ever secure if they did not hold it.
Same problem as (A): this option uses "was" when we want the conditional "would" instead. (C) is gone.

Quote:
(D) Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was also of interest to the French throughout the first half of the twentieth century because they assumed that without that, they could never be secure about their grip on Algeria.
The phrase "that without that" makes my head hurt. If you read it a few times you can figure out what the author means -- the first "that" is introducing a clause and the second "that" appears to be a pronoun standing for "the Strait of Gibraltar." While that's not an absolute grammatical error, it's far less clear than (B).

Then there's the phrase "they could never be secure about their grip." This seems to suggest that the French might feel insecure about their grip. What does that even mean? That the French might think that "Algeria" is cheating on them with other colonial powers?

Contrast this nonsense with the meaning in (B), which conveys a scenario in which the grip itself might be insecure. That's way more logical in this context.

So (D) is out.

Quote:
(E) Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was also of interest to the French throughout the first half of the twentieth century because they assumed that never would their grip on Algeria be secure if they did not hold it.
The phrase "they assumed that never would their grip on Algeria be secure" might not be grammatically incorrect, but it's a hot mess, and you need to read it several times to make sense of it.

Also, by including the conditional "would" part of the construction before the "if" component, at first we're left to think that the French just assumed their grip on Algeria would never be secure in general, before discovering that this is the case only if the French did not hold the Strait of Gibraltar. Inherently wrong? No. But it's confusing.

If (B) is clearer and less confusing than (E), it's better. So (B) is our answer.

Isn't the "it" in AC B referring to Morocco and not "the Strait of Gibraltar"?
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,783
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,783
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rishabhchats


Isn't the "it" in AC B referring to Morocco and not "the Strait of Gibraltar"?
Yes, great catch. Thank you! It's fixed now.
   1   2   3 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts