GMAT Question of the Day: Daily via email | Daily via Instagram New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video

It is currently 02 Jul 2020, 04:49

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 17 Sep 2016
Posts: 342
Re: Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Sep 2016, 22:54
anyone can help pronoun issue?

why it refers to Morocco in B, IMO, pronoun "it " is ambiguous, because the pronoun "it" can refer to Morocco, also Strait or Gibraltar

thanks in advance

have a nice day
>_~
Retired Moderator
User avatar
S
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2797
Location: Germany
Schools: German MBA
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Sep 2016, 06:10
zoezhuyan wrote:
anyone can help pronoun issue?

why it refers to Morocco in B, IMO, pronoun "it " is ambiguous, because the pronoun "it" can refer to Morocco, also Strait or Gibraltar

thanks in advance

have a nice day
>_~


There is a causation relation in this sentence.

Why Morocco was of interest to the French?... because without Morocco, the French would be at a disadvantage.

From the context of the sentence the logical antecedent of "it" is "Morocco".
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2445
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Mar 2017, 23:25
Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was also of interest to the French throughout the first half of the twentieth century because they assumed that if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure.

(A) if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure - the if clause uses simple past tense , so the then clause should have "would+verb"
(B) without it their grip on Algeria would never be secure - This choice changes the “if-then” construction into conditional would. However, it clearly conveys the meaning that without holding “Morocco” the French grip would never be secure on Algeria.
(C) their grip on Algeria was not ever secure if they did not hold it - Antecedent of it is unclear - It can refer to either “Algeria” or “Morocco”.
(D) without that, they could never be secure about their grip on Algeria - Pronoun it should be used to refer to Morocco ; to state a hypothetical scenario we need to use "would +verb"
(E) never would their grip on Algeria be secure if they did not hold it - Antecedent of it is unclear - It can refer to either “Algeria” or “Morocco”.

Answer B
_________________
When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 10 Apr 2015
Posts: 175
GPA: 3.31
Re: Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Mar 2017, 05:33
Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was also of interest to the French throughout the first half of the twentieth century because they assumed that if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure.

(A) if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure
'would' instead of 'was'
(B) without it their grip on Algeria would never be secure
simple. meaning is not distorted. Correct.

(C) their grip on Algeria was not ever secure if they did not hold it
Complex.wordy.
(D) without that, they could never be secure about their grip on Algeria
assumed that without that, ?
not clear construction of sentence.

(E) never would their grip on Algeria be secure if they did not hold it
Wrong construction of sentence.
Senior SC Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1339
Location: Malaysia
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 May 2017, 05:11
2
1
kizito2001 wrote:
The Official Guide for GMAT Review 2016

Practice Question
Question No.: SC 88
Page: 690

Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was also of interest to the French throughout the first half of the twentieth century because they assumed that if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure.

(A) if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure
(B) without it their grip on Algeria would never be secure
(C) their grip on Algeria was not ever secure if they did not hold it
(D) without that, they could never be secure about their grip on Algeria
(E) never would their grip on Algeria be secure if they did not hold it


First Glance

The underline begins with the word if. Some kind of conditional verb structure might be an issue.

Issues

(1) Verb: was

The original sentence uses the conditional structure if X, (then) Y. Conditional structures require certain verb tenses, depending on the intended meaning of the sentence. (Note: Some answers don't specifically use the word if, but the conditional nature of the meaning is still clear.)

In this case, the if portion is in past tense (if they did not hold it) and the full meaning is hypothetical: They did not know what was going to happen after that. The second half of the structure, then, should be in the present conditional form: Their grip would be insecure. Answers (A) and (C) both incorrectly use simple past was for the conditional portion of the sentence; eliminate them.

(2) Pronoun: it; that

Four of the five answers use the pronoun it; answer (D) uses the pronoun that. The word it is a personal pronoun; the word that is a demonstrative pronoun.

When demonstrative pronouns are used alone, not in conjunction with a noun, such as "that car", they should not refer to a noun that is located within the same main clause. In answer (D), the pronoun that refers to Morocco, which is in the same main clause. Eliminate answer (D).

The other four all use it, so they must all be correct, right? Not so fast. Answers (A) and (B) do correctly use it; first, the noun Morocco appears, then the pronoun it, which refers to Morocco, and finally Algeria (so it's clear that it does not refer to Algeria). In answers (C) and (E), however, the pronoun it does not appear until the end of the sentence. Do the French need to hold Morocco or Algeria? The sentence is no longer clear. Eliminate answers (C) and (E).

(3) Meaning

The original sentence says that their grip was insecure. Answer (B) conveys a similar meaning, this time with the correct conditional tense: Their grip would never be secure. In both cases, the grip is the thing that is (or is not) secure. Answer (D) changes this structure: The French could never be secure about their grip. What's the difference?

The meaning in answer (D) no longer indicates whether the grip actually is secure. Rather, this choice talks about how the French feel about the situation. For example: The dog could not be secure about his grip on the bone (he wasn't sure he had a good grip on the bone). The dog's grip on the bone was not secure (he definitely did not have a good grip on the bone). The two sentences convey different meanings. Eliminate answer (D).

The Correct Answer

Correct answer (B) fixes the initial tense error by changing was to the conditional would be.
_________________
"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."

“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”

"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."

Rules for posting in verbal forum | Please DO NOT post short answer in your post!

Advanced Search : https://gmatclub.com/forum/advanced-search/
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 23 Sep 2011
Posts: 94
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jan 2018, 15:24
1
Hi guys. I just want to check the if-then rule.

If simple past then condition will have Simple past or use of would. is this rule correct?

If the above said if-then rule for simple Past is correct then can anyone explain why option A and Option E are wrong.
_________________
1. Well Begun is Half done
2. He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes; he who does not ask a question remains a fool forever.
3. The night is darkest just before the dawn
SVP
SVP
User avatar
D
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 1908
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Re: Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jan 2018, 08:42
1
Rocket7 wrote:
If simple past then condition will have Simple past or use of would. is this rule correct?

Hi Rocket7, both can be correct, in specific contexts.

i) Condition in simple past, followed by simple past: In ancient Egypt, if a person committed crime, he was stoned. (both events happening in the past, depicting a generally true condition in the past)

ii) Condition in simple past, followed by usage of would: Jack realized that if he did not work hard, he would fail. (Prediction of future, made in the past)

Quote:
If the above said if-then rule for simple Past is correct then can anyone explain why option A and Option E are wrong.

The context here conforms to prediction of future, made in the past (their grip on Algeria would never be secure). Hence, option A (Condition in simple past, followed by simple past) is not correct.

You would notice that E is just needlessly an inverted conditional.

p.s. Our book EducationAisle Sentence Correction Nirvana discusses Hypothetical Conditional, its application and examples in significant detail. If someone is interested, PM me your email-id; I can mail the corresponding section.
_________________
Thanks,
Ashish
GMAT-99th Percentile, MBA - ISB Hyderabad
EducationAisle Online GMAT Classes

Sentence Correction Nirvana available on Amazon.in and Flipkart

Join us for a free GMAT Live Online Class from anywhere in the world
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 09 Apr 2018
Posts: 22
Re: Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Apr 2019, 06:10
The starting modifier should modify Morocco and not France, even though logically we do understand it refers to France grammatically it refers to Morocco since it is touching the modifier.

Please explain.
CEO
CEO
User avatar
V
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 3302
Location: India
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Re: Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Apr 2019, 10:02
DivyaKnows wrote:
The starting modifier should modify Morocco and not France, even though logically we do understand it refers to France grammatically it refers to Morocco since it is touching the modifier.

Please explain.
The it refers to Morocco. That's a meaning call.

Also, the word France is not there in the sentence. The sentence actually uses French. In fact, the non-underlined portion uses they to refer to the French.
_________________
VP
VP
User avatar
V
Status: Learning
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 1087
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE: Engineering (Manufacturing)
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Dec 2019, 22:29
seofah wrote:
Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was also of interest to the French throughout the first half of the twentieth century because they assumed that if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure.


(A) if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure

(B) without it their grip on Algeria would never be secure

(C) their grip on Algeria was not ever secure if they did not hold it

(D) without that, they could never be secure about their grip on Algeria

(E) never would their grip on Algeria be secure if they did not hold it



The Official Guide for GMAT Review, 11th Edition, 2005

Practice Question
Question No.: SC 57
Page: 646

Attachment:
01.jpg

Attachment:
02.jpg

Attachment:
03.jpg


Guys, this question was asked a few times.
It is an excellent question to learn from.
Please take time to explain thoroughly.
Thanks! :)

https://www.nytimes.com/1983/03/06/books/nonfiction-in-brief-003388.html

In addition to its strategic proximity to the Straits of Gibraltar, Morocco was of interest to the French because without it their grip on Algeria would never be secure. Mr. Porch describes with flourishes the period between 1903 and 1912 during which France ''nibbled'' away at Morocco until she digested her into the empire.


Imo B

I took a lot of time to solve this question. This question is a really good question from OG

1) Conditional sentence. Past tense + would is correct (Future in Past)
2) Pronoun error It/that

A Conditional sentence so if with would structure is correct since A has was in the structure. A is wrong.
B No error keep it.
C If + would strurcture is correct. It is now ambiguious. "It" can refer to Morocco or Algeria. So out.
D Use of that is not proper here. We have one entity i.e Morocco so it is proper. Also we do not need copy of Morocco we need the exact same Morocco. So this is out.
E Pronoun error same as D. Inverted sentence is not good.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 04 Apr 2014
Posts: 22
Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Dec 2019, 04:45
B) isn't as bad as the other answers, but it's really not very good either.

Saying "without it their grip on Algeria would never be secure" is quite ambiguous.

There needs to be some indication of possession of Morocco, which is not conveyed by a simple "without it." Much better would be something like "without control over it . . . " or "without occupation of it . . ."

But I guess that's expecting the "correct" answer to make too much sense. :tongue_opt3
Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 18 Oct 2018
Posts: 12
Location: Thailand
GPA: 3.45
WE: Other (Other)
Re: Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Mar 2020, 16:00
I eliminate B. because I think commas is required after it >> without it, their grip on Algeria would never be secure.

Any suggestion? Thank you!
CEO
CEO
User avatar
V
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 3302
Location: India
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Re: Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Mar 2020, 20:17
1
bbb123 wrote:
I eliminate B. because I think commas is required after it >> without it, their grip on Algeria would never be secure.

Any suggestion? Thank you!
Hi bbb123,

I wouldn't use that to remove option B (which, by the way, is the correct answer :)). It's okay to skip the comma after a short prepositional phrase (in this case, without it).

In general, we should try not to remove an option only on the basis of how it uses a comma. There are certain things, like comma splices, that we definitely want to avoid, but most of the other "rules" we come across are not particularly reliable.
_________________
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 27 Jul 2016
Posts: 2
Re: Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Apr 2020, 07:36
While i have selected B, my question is shouldn't there be a comma after 'without it'?
VP
VP
avatar
P
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 1046
Re: Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Apr 2020, 03:53
I think that when pronoun, particularly "it" in our problem, occurs at the end of the sentence, it is likely that we have ambiguity error.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 12 Feb 2017
Posts: 9
Re: Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 May 2020, 03:15
Hi Experts/ GMATNinja / daagh

Would you please explain this question in detail. Especially, why the verb form was is incorrect and would is correct?
CEO
CEO
User avatar
V
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Posts: 3173
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 May 2020, 09:07
seofah wrote:
Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was also of interest to the French throughout the first half of the twentieth century because they assumed that if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure.


(A) if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure

(B) without it their grip on Algeria would never be secure

(C) their grip on Algeria was not ever secure if they did not hold it

(D) without that, they could never be secure about their grip on Algeria

(E) never would their grip on Algeria be secure if they did not hold it


The Official Guide for GMAT Review, 11th Edition, 2005

Practice Question
Question No.: SC 57
Page: 646

Attachment:
01.jpg

Attachment:
02.jpg

Attachment:
03.jpg


Guys, this question was asked a few times.
It is an excellent question to learn from.
Please take time to explain thoroughly.
Thanks! :)

https://www.nytimes.com/1983/03/06/books/nonfiction-in-brief-003388.html

In addition to its strategic proximity to the Straits of Gibraltar, Morocco was of interest to the French because without it their grip on Algeria would never be secure. Mr. Porch describes with flourishes the period between 1903 and 1912 during which France ''nibbled'' away at Morocco until she digested her into the empire.


Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was also of interest to the French throughout the first half of the twentieth century because they assumed that if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure.


(A) if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure

(B) without it their grip on Algeria would never be secure

(C) their grip on Algeria was not ever secure if they did not hold it

(D) without that, they could never be secure about their grip on Algeria

(E) never would their grip on Algeria be secure if they did not hold it - lengthy/awkward

IMO B
_________________
Kinshook Chaturvedi
Email: kinshook.chaturvedi@gmail.com
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 15 Mar 2020
Posts: 27
Re: Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 May 2020, 00:44
beckee529 wrote:
botirvoy wrote:
Guys, this question was asked a few times.
It is an excellent question to learn from.
Please take time to explain thoroughly.
Thanks! :)

59. Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was also of interest to the French throughout the first half of the twentieth century because they assumed that if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure.
(A) if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure
(B) without it their grip on Algeria would never be secure
(C) their grip on Algeria was not ever secure if they did not hold it
(D) without that, they could never be secure about their grip on Algeria
(E) never would their grip on Algeria be secure if they did not hold it


got B for the answer
(B) without it their grip on Algeria would never be secure

it - refers to grip
their - refers back to the French



IMHO, "the grip" refers back to the Morocco. That is, without "Morocco", the grip on Algeria would never be secure.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was   [#permalink] 29 May 2020, 00:44

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 38 posts ] 

Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne