BBianca
I don't understand how C is strengthening the argument here. As a matter of fact, I thought it weakened the conclusion because as I can see, the speaker says that the both birds diverged from each other and we know this because they have the virus in the same spot. So, ,how exactly does insertion of the virus in a random spot help?
Refer the passage again and notice the sequence. I'm no expert but would try best to explain to help, though i faltered in this one.
ganand
After a hepadnavirus inserts itself into a chromosome of an animal, fragments of the virus are passed on to all of that animal's descendants. A hepadnavirus fragment is present in a chromosome of the zebra finch and in precisely the same location in a corresponding chromosome of the dark-eyed junco. The fact that these two bird species diverged from each other about 25 million years ago therefore means that the hepadnavirus is at least 25 million years old.
Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
(A) Viruses can affect the evolution of an organism and can thereby influence the likelihood of their diverging into two species.
(B) The chromosomes of the zebra finch and the dark-eyed junco contain fragments of no virus other than the hepadnavirus.
(C) When a virus inserts itself into an animal's chromosome, the insertion occurs at a random spot.
(D) Many bird species other than the zebra finch and the dark-eyed junco contain fragments of the hepadnavirus.
(E) The presence of a hepadnavirus in an animal species does not affect the likelihood of that species' survival.
First, fragments are passed on to next generations. Then it gives an info about ZF and DEJ birds wherein the H virus fragment is present in chromosome of the two birds at the same location.
(Now, here one must have raised his/her eyebrows for why such an info(location) is given at this point.) Then there's this conclusion as in the two birds are related, diverging 25M years ago and thus H virus is 25M years old. How is that possible?
So, you get the jump that the conclusion makes here. We need to just find that jump. I am more comfortable with POE approach than choosing C.
D and E are plain wrong for irrelevancy. A is wrong for two red text nowhere elaborate or even suggest slightly about how old the virus is. B is wrong for similar logic but by different factor. Again how other virus fragments help find age of the H virus. Here itself you can choose C.
C gives a point blank info that is hard to digest for how it is at all helping us. But if the spot of insertion(different from location of fragment presence) is not same, does it weaken, may be. Whether same location or not the vital point is H virus fragment is passed on to next generations, thus giving us a hint that Virus is also somewhat 25M years old.
HTH.