Last visit was: 11 Dec 2024, 03:49 It is currently 11 Dec 2024, 03:49
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
ganand
Joined: 17 May 2015
Last visit: 19 Mar 2022
Posts: 198
Own Kudos:
3,317
 [36]
Given Kudos: 85
Posts: 198
Kudos: 3,317
 [36]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
34
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 10 Dec 2024
Posts: 7,153
Own Kudos:
66,087
 [11]
Given Kudos: 1,870
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,153
Kudos: 66,087
 [11]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
broall
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Last visit: 07 Apr 2021
Posts: 1,141
Own Kudos:
6,605
 [1]
Given Kudos: 65
Status:Long way to go!
Location: Viet Nam
Posts: 1,141
Kudos: 6,605
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
arvind910619
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Last visit: 18 Oct 2024
Posts: 854
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 755
Status:Learning
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Products:
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
Posts: 854
Kudos: 582
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I am totally confused by the answer to this question
I thought the answer is A
Experts please explain the answer as the argument does not talks about the pattern of insertion of the chromosome.
avatar
ma14292
Joined: 05 Sep 2017
Last visit: 26 Oct 2017
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Given Kudos: 26
Posts: 3
Kudos: 1
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The answer is C because, given that the virus appears in a random chromosome, the chances of finding it in the same spots in two different species is very very very low unless the two species were merged into ONE.
User avatar
adkikani
User avatar
IIM School Moderator
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Last visit: 24 Dec 2023
Posts: 1,246
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,207
Location: India
WE:Engineering (Other)
Posts: 1,246
Kudos: 1,283
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja broall

Quote:
the hepadnavirus is at least 25 million years old

Do we not have to strengthen this conclusion?

Is not B strengthening the argument by eliminating against other possibilities and protecting against
potential weakeners? Let me know your thoughts.

WR,
Arpit.
User avatar
arvind910619
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Last visit: 18 Oct 2024
Posts: 854
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 755
Status:Learning
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Products:
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
Posts: 854
Kudos: 582
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja
arvind910619
I am totally confused by the answer to this question
I thought the answer is A
Experts please explain the answer as the argument does not talks about the pattern of insertion of the chromosome.
We are told that "a hepadnavirus fragment is present in a chromosome of the zebra finch and in precisely the same location in a corresponding chromosome of the dark-eyed junco."

But what if the virus always inserts itself in the same location whenever it infects an animal? If that were the case, the fact that the virus is present in the same location in two animals would not be strong evidence that the virus must have entered that location before the two animals diverged. In that case, the virus could have entered the two animals independently at any point in time.

Quote:
(C) When a virus inserts itself into an animal's chromosome, the insertion occurs at a random spot.
Choice (C) tells us that the location is random, which means it would be highly unlikely that the virus entered the two animals independently. This suggests that the virus likely entered that location before the two animals diverged 25 million years. This, in turn, supports the conclusion that the virus is at least 25 million years old.

Quote:
(A) Viruses can affect the evolution of an organism and can thereby influence the likelihood of their diverging into two species.
Choice (A), on the other hand, does not give us any reason to believe that the virus likely entered that location before the two animals diverged. This statement is much too general to suggest that the specific hepadnavirus discussed in the passage is what caused the animals to diverge. There could have been numerous other viruses affecting the organism more than 25 million years ago, and we have no idea whether this specific hepadnavirus was one of them.

Choice (C) is the best answer.

Hi GMATNinja

Thanks for the explanation though i had to read it twice to understand fully.
I find LSAT CR to much harder than GMAT CR.

Regards,
Arvind
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 10 Dec 2024
Posts: 7,153
Own Kudos:
66,087
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1,870
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,153
Kudos: 66,087
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
arvind910619
I find LSAT CR to much harder than GMAT CR.

Agreed! In theory, GMAT OG questions range in difficulty from 200 to 800, but I'd argue that the LSAT questions range in difficulty from 500 to 850. Or something like that. So they're great practice if you need an extra challenge -- and if you can nail the LSAT stuff, the GMAT questions will eventually start to feel easy. Hopefully. :)
User avatar
arvind910619
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Last visit: 18 Oct 2024
Posts: 854
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 755
Status:Learning
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Products:
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
Posts: 854
Kudos: 582
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja
arvind910619
I find LSAT CR to much harder than GMAT CR.

Agreed! In theory, GMAT OG questions range in difficulty from 200 to 800, but I'd argue that the LSAT questions range in difficulty from 500 to 850. Or something like that. So they're great practice if you need an extra challenge -- and if you can nail the LSAT stuff, the GMAT questions will eventually start to feel easy. Hopefully. :)

Indeed i have made it point to practice LSAT question to have a healthy challenge :-)
User avatar
abrakadabra21
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Last visit: 10 Nov 2017
Posts: 256
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 342
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Posts: 256
Kudos: 192
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conclusion :- Virus H is at least 25 million years old.
Premise:-

1> Found in is present in a chromosome of the zebra finch and in precisely the same location in a corresponding chromosome of the dark-eyed junco.
2> Two birds were diverged 25 million years before.
3> fragments of the virus are passed on to all of that animal's descendants.

So if H is found at the same location in two birds who belonged to same species, logical conclusion is - H is 25 years old otherwise they wouldn't have found it in both birds.

Further, "Precisely same location" carries some significance for this conclusion.

This conclusion can be weakened :-
1. if we can show that in both birds, it happened recently. (imagine you have a grandfather. if you have X attribute and he has X attribute, may be you got it from your grandfather, but what if, you both acquired it recently) right?

(A) Viruses can affect the evolution of an organism and can thereby influence the likelihood of their diverging into two species. :-
I think this would have been a better strengthener if it is written in this manner :-
Only H Viruses affect the evolution of an organism and thereby influence the likelihood of their diverging into two species :- In this case, we are 100% sure that virus was there 25 million years before and it was the reason that divergence happen.

(C)When a virus inserts itself into an animal's chromosome, the insertion occurs at a random spot.
If it is not true then it weakens our conclusion. if it occurs randomly, then why H is found at the same location for both birds. They both have acquired this from the same descendants. otherwise if it is a recent time, for zebra finch it could have been at X location and for DEJ it could have been another Y location.

It strengthen our conclusion.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 10 Dec 2024
Posts: 7,153
Own Kudos:
66,087
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,870
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,153
Kudos: 66,087
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
adkikani
Do we not have to strengthen this conclusion?

Is not B strengthening the argument by eliminating against other possibilities and protecting against
potential weakeners? Let me know your thoughts.

WR,
Arpit.
Quote:
(B) The chromosomes of the zebra finch and the dark-eyed junco contain fragments of no virus other than the hepadnavirus.
We are only told that fragments of a hepadnavirus are passed on to all descendants once inserted into an animal's chromosome. We are not told what happens when a chromosome is infected with any other kind of virus. For example, perhaps no other virus passes fragments on to an animal's descendants.

This information does not tell us whether the hepadnavirus entered those animals before or after they diverged and, thus, does not tell us anything about the age of the hepadnavirus.

Choice (B) neither strengthens nor weakens the argument.
User avatar
stne
Joined: 27 May 2012
Last visit: 11 Dec 2024
Posts: 1,737
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 645
Posts: 1,737
Kudos: 1,643
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
arvind910619
GMATNinja
arvind910619
I am totally confused by the answer to this question
I thought the answer is A
Experts please explain the answer as the argument does not talks about the pattern of insertion of the chromosome.
We are told that "a hepadnavirus fragment is present in a chromosome of the zebra finch and in precisely the same location in a corresponding chromosome of the dark-eyed junco."

But what if the virus always inserts itself in the same location whenever it infects an animal? If that were the case, the fact that the virus is present in the same location in two animals would not be strong evidence that the virus must have entered that location before the two animals diverged. In that case, the virus could have entered the two animals independently at any point in time.

Quote:
(C) When a virus inserts itself into an animal's chromosome, the insertion occurs at a random spot.
Choice (C) tells us that the location is random, which means it would be highly unlikely that the virus entered the two animals independently. This suggests that the virus likely entered that location before the two animals diverged 25 million years. This, in turn, supports the conclusion that the virus is at least 25 million years old.

Quote:
(A) Viruses can affect the evolution of an organism and can thereby influence the likelihood of their diverging into two species.
Choice (A), on the other hand, does not give us any reason to believe that the virus likely entered that location before the two animals diverged. This statement is much too general to suggest that the specific hepadnavirus discussed in the passage is what caused the animals to diverge. There could have been numerous other viruses affecting the organism more than 25 million years ago, and we have no idea whether this specific hepadnavirus was one of them.

Choice (C) is the best answer.

Hi GMATNinja

Thanks for the explanation though i had to read it twice to understand fully.
I find LSAT CR to much harder than GMAT CR.

Regards,
Arvind


What if in its random insertion it inserted itself into the same spot that it went into 25 years ago?
This could give us a false proof of its age.

Lets say the virus went into the dark-eyed junco chromosome 10 years later but it went into the same spot as it had in the zebra finch , this would certainly not strengthen the argument.

option C doesn't say the virus infecting the same spot twice is highly unlikely.If it said so then it could certainly imply that both the species got infected at the same time 25 years ago.

option C falls apart if the virus in its random insertion it coincidentally went into the same spot as it had 25 years ago.
avatar
Sidraman57
Joined: 21 Jan 2018
Last visit: 28 Oct 2019
Posts: 6
Given Kudos: 17
Location: India
Schools: IIM (WL)
GPA: 3
Schools: IIM (WL)
Posts: 6
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
[quote="ganand"]After a hepadnavirus inserts itself into a chromosome of an animal, fragments of the virus are passed on to all of that animal's descendants. A hepadnavirus fragment is present in a chromosome of the zebra finch and in precisely the same location in a corresponding chromosome of the dark-eyed junco. The fact that these two bird species diverged from each other about 25 million years ago therefore means that the hepadnavirus is at least 25 million years old.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?


(C) When a virus inserts itself into an animal's chromosome, the insertion occurs at a random spot.
talks about being in precisely the same location just as in the passage.
User avatar
Kushchokhani
Joined: 05 Jan 2020
Last visit: 03 Apr 2024
Posts: 517
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 692
Status:Admitted to IIM Shillong (PGPEx 2023-24)
Affiliations: CFA Institute; ICAI; BCAS
Location: India
WE 2: EA to CFO (Consumer Products)
GPA: 3.78
WE:Corporate Finance (Commercial Banking)
Products:
Posts: 517
Kudos: 606
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
stne
What if in its random insertion it inserted itself into the same spot that it went into 25 years ago?
This could give us a false proof of its age.

Lets say the virus went into the dark-eyed junco chromosome 10 years later but it went into the same spot as it had in the zebra finch , this would certainly not strengthen the argument.

option C doesn't say the virus infecting the same spot twice is highly unlikely.If it said so then it could certainly imply that both the species got infected at the same time 25 years ago.

option C falls apart if the virus in its random insertion it coincidentally went into the same spot as it had 25 years ago.

stne

Your contention seems to be true. However, choice C seems better than choice A on the basis of specific is preferred over general. Choice A is very general and may not cover this specific virus. On the contrary, choice C states "a virus" which covers this specific virus as well.

Also, please refer to this post which somewhat explains our contrary contention.
https://gmatclub.com/forum/after-a-hepa ... l#p1922724
avatar
BBianca
Joined: 08 Nov 2021
Last visit: 30 May 2022
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I don't understand how C is strengthening the argument here. As a matter of fact, I thought it weakened the conclusion because as I can see, the speaker says that the both birds diverged from each other and we know this because they have the virus in the same spot. So, ,how exactly does insertion of the virus in a random spot help?
User avatar
unraveled
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 11 Dec 2024
Posts: 2,741
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 764
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,741
Kudos: 2,008
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
BBianca
I don't understand how C is strengthening the argument here. As a matter of fact, I thought it weakened the conclusion because as I can see, the speaker says that the both birds diverged from each other and we know this because they have the virus in the same spot. So, ,how exactly does insertion of the virus in a random spot help?
Refer the passage again and notice the sequence. I'm no expert but would try best to explain to help, though i faltered in this one.
ganand
After a hepadnavirus inserts itself into a chromosome of an animal, fragments of the virus are passed on to all of that animal's descendants. A hepadnavirus fragment is present in a chromosome of the zebra finch and in precisely the same location in a corresponding chromosome of the dark-eyed junco. The fact that these two bird species diverged from each other about 25 million years ago therefore means that the hepadnavirus is at least 25 million years old.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

(A) Viruses can affect the evolution of an organism and can thereby influence the likelihood of their diverging into two species.

(B) The chromosomes of the zebra finch and the dark-eyed junco contain fragments of no virus other than the hepadnavirus.

(C) When a virus inserts itself into an animal's chromosome, the insertion occurs at a random spot.

(D) Many bird species other than the zebra finch and the dark-eyed junco contain fragments of the hepadnavirus.

(E) The presence of a hepadnavirus in an animal species does not affect the likelihood of that species' survival.

First, fragments are passed on to next generations. Then it gives an info about ZF and DEJ birds wherein the H virus fragment is present in chromosome of the two birds at the same location. (Now, here one must have raised his/her eyebrows for why such an info(location) is given at this point.)
Then there's this conclusion as in the two birds are related, diverging 25M years ago and thus H virus is 25M years old. How is that possible?
So, you get the jump that the conclusion makes here. We need to just find that jump. I am more comfortable with POE approach than choosing C.

D and E are plain wrong for irrelevancy. A is wrong for two red text nowhere elaborate or even suggest slightly about how old the virus is. B is wrong for similar logic but by different factor. Again how other virus fragments help find age of the H virus. Here itself you can choose C.

C gives a point blank info that is hard to digest for how it is at all helping us. But if the spot of insertion(different from location of fragment presence) is not same, does it weaken, may be. Whether same location or not the vital point is H virus fragment is passed on to next generations, thus giving us a hint that Virus is also somewhat 25M years old.

HTH.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 10 Dec 2024
Posts: 7,153
Own Kudos:
66,087
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,870
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,153
Kudos: 66,087
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
BBianca
I don't understand how C is strengthening the argument here. As a matter of fact, I thought it weakened the conclusion because as I can see, the speaker says that the both birds diverged from each other and we know this because they have the virus in the same spot. So, ,how exactly does insertion of the virus in a random spot help?
We actually don't know that the two species diverged because they have the virus in the same spot. We just know that the two species diverged at some point, and also have the virus in the same spot.

In the passage, the author attempts to set up a timeline of events: first, an animal got infected by a hepadnavirus. Then, the animal's descendants diverged into two distinct species. Because the species diverged about 25 million years ago, the author concludes that the virus must be at least that old.

Notice that there's a gap in this argument: how do we know that the virus infected the animal before it diverged into two species? Isn't it possible that the virus infected both species separately, after they diverged?

(C) helps us to close this gap:
Quote:
(C) When a virus inserts itself into an animal's chromosome, the insertion occurs at a random spot.
We know from the passage that the two species are infected in "in precisely the same location" within their respective chromosomes. (C) tells us that this point of infection is random. The odds of two species randomly getting infected in the exact same spot seem pretty low. So, the information in (C) strengthens the argument that the animal got infected before it diverged into two species.

(C) is the correct answer.

I hope that helps!
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7153 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts