It is currently 22 Nov 2017, 04:30

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

After winning 80% of his first 40 matches, Igby won 50

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Posts: 128

Kudos [?]: 254 [1], given: 23

GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V37
GMAT 2: 720 Q48 V40
After winning 80% of his first 40 matches, Igby won 50 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Mar 2012, 04:03
1
This post received
KUDOS
22
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

35% (02:06) correct 65% (01:49) wrong based on 448 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

After winning 80% of his first 40 matches, Igby won 50 percent of his remaining matches. How many total matches did he win?

(1) If Igby had won 50 percent of the total number of matches he played, he would have lost 12 more total matches.
(2) If Igby had won 80% of the total number of matches he played, he would have won 18 more total matches.

To me it seems that both statements contradict each other. The first one basically claims that he has only played 40 total games, while the second claims that he has played 62.5 matches.

source: gmathacks
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 254 [1], given: 23

TOEFL Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 1603

Kudos [?]: 601 [0], given: 40

Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: After winnig 80% of his first 40 matches... [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Mar 2012, 04:47
Let remaining matches be x

So Total matches won = 0.8 * 40 + 0.5 * x
The number of matches not won = 0.2 * 40 + Number of Matches Lost + Number of Matches drawn

1) 0.5 (40 + x) = 0.2 * 40 + Number of matches lost + 12

So x can’t be found, we don’t know the number of matches lost, because from the remaining %age (50% of x), there is no breakup for number of matches drawn.

2) 0.8(40 + x) = 0.8 * 40 + 0.5 * x + 18
So x can be found
Answer - B
_________________

Formula of Life -> Achievement/Potential = k * Happiness (where k is a constant)

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 601 [0], given: 40

Expert Post
6 KUDOS received
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 42302

Kudos [?]: 133019 [6], given: 12402

Re: After winning 80% of his first 40 matches, Igby won 50 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Mar 2012, 05:33
6
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
7
This post was
BOOKMARKED
You really do not need any formula for this question. Also I can see no contraction between the statements.

After winning 80% of his first 40 matches, Igby won 50 percent of his remaining matches. How many total matches did he win?

(1) If Igby had won 50 percent of the total number of matches he played, he would have lost 12 more total matches --> Igby won 80% of his first 40 matches and 50% of the remaining matches, in order to win 50% of total matches he should have won 50% of his first 40 matches too (instead of 80%, so 30% less), which would have resulted in 0.3*40=12 more losses. So, this statement gives us the info we could deduce ourselves. Not sufficient.

(2) If Igby had won 80% of the total number of matches he played, he would have won 18 more total matches --> with the same logic he should have won 80% of the remaining matches, (instead of 50%, so 30% more). So 30% more winnings in the remaining matches (X) result in 18 more wins: 0.3*x=18 --> x=60 --> total matches won: 0.8*40+0.5*60=62. Sufficient.

Answer: B.
_________________

New to the Math Forum?
Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread | All You Need for Quant | PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!!

Resources:
GMAT Math Book | Triangles | Polygons | Coordinate Geometry | Factorials | Circles | Number Theory | Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets | PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders | GMAT Prep Software Analysis | SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS) | Tricky questions from previous years.

Collection of Questions:
PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat

DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.


What are GMAT Club Tests?
Extra-hard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics

Kudos [?]: 133019 [6], given: 12402

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 13 Sep 2015
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: After winning 80% of his first 40 matches, Igby won 50 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Oct 2015, 09:38
After winning 80% of his first 40 matches, Igby won 50 percent of his remaining matches. How many total matches did he win?

(1) If Igby had won 50 percent of the total number of matches he played, he would have lost 12 more total matches.
(2) If Igby had won 80% of the total number of matches he played, he would have won 18 more total matches.

To me it seems that both statements contradict each other. The first one basically claims that he has only played 40 total games, while the second claims that he has played 62.5 matches.

Information given - won 80% of first 40 matches - 32, 50% of remaining matches
Information required - total matches won

If we can know the number of remaining matches we can know the desired answer

Statement 1 - If Igby won 50% of total matches he played, he would have lost 50% of the matches. It goes to follow that he would have won/lost 50% of his first 40 matches, which is equal to 20. The difference of 12 extra matches lost is accounted for in the first 40 matches and thus the information regarding 12 more matches lost is redundant. We still cannot find the answer to the question, Insufficient

eq : Let total matches be x, remaining matches x-40
32+ 50% (x-40) - 50% x = 12
32 + .5x - 20 - .5x = 12

Statement 2 : Lets form a simple algebraic equation to check whether statement 2 is sufficient.

Let total matches played - x
Remaining matches - x-40

Eq:
80% of total matches - ( 80% 0f first 40 + 50% of remaining) = 18
80% x - ( 32 + 50% (x-40) = 18
.8x - 32 - .5x + 20 =18
.3x = 30
x = 100

Therefore total matches won --- 32 + 50% (100-40) = 62 Sufficient

Answer : B

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Expert Post
Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
User avatar
P
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 4343

Kudos [?]: 3053 [0], given: 0

GPA: 3.82
Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: After winning 80% of his first 40 matches, Igby won 50 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Oct 2015, 13:30
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution.

After winning 80% of his first 40 matches, Igby won 50 percent of his remaining matches. How many total matches did he win?

(1) If Igby had won 50 percent of the total number of matches he played, he would have lost 12 more total matches.
(2) If Igby had won 80% of the total number of matches he played, he would have won 18 more total matches.

To me it seems that both statements contradict each other. The first one basically claims that he has only played 40 total games, while the second claims that he has played 62.5 matches.

If we let the number of games remaining to be x, then this question only consists of 1 variable, but we are given 2 equations from the conditions, so there is high chance (D) is going to be our answer.
From condition 1, 0.5(40+x)=0.2*40+number of games lost+12. From this we cannot obtain the value of x, so this is insufficient (as there may be games drawn)
From condition 2, 0.8(40+x)=0.8*40+0.5x+18. From this we can achieve a unique solution for x, so this is sufficient. The answer is therefore (B).

For cases where we need 1 more equation, such as original conditions with “1 variable”, or “2 variables and 1 equation”, or “3 variables and 2 equations”, we have 1 equation each in both 1) and 2). Therefore, there is 59 % chance that D is the answer, while A or B has 38% chance and C or E has 3% chance. Since D is most likely to be the answer using 1) and 2) separately according to DS definition. Obviously there may be cases where the answer is A, B, C or E.
_________________

MathRevolution: Finish GMAT Quant Section with 10 minutes to spare
The one-and-only World’s First Variable Approach for DS and IVY Approach for PS with ease, speed and accuracy.
Find a 10% off coupon code for GMAT Club members.
“Receive 5 Math Questions & Solutions Daily”
Unlimited Access to over 120 free video lessons - try it yourself
See our Youtube demo

Kudos [?]: 3053 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 18 May 2016
Posts: 20

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 5

Re: After winning 80% of his first 40 matches, Igby won 50 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Jul 2017, 04:20
My answer:

What we really need to find is the number of matches n. Then we can apply the given percentages.
Statement 1 gives us, in equation: 1/2n=12+32+1/2n-20. n cancel out, no additional info. Insufficient.
Statement 2 gives us, in equation: 8/10n = 18 + 32 + 1/2n - 20. Can solve for n. Sufficient.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 5

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 22 Jan 2017
Posts: 36

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 5

GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
After winning 80% of his first 40 matches, Igby won 50 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Aug 2017, 22:25
I really hate these problems. For me, it helps to look at the statements and think, "ok which side of the coin are we looking at wins or losses?" From there, you just try and construct the equation.

I try and think of it like a weighted average, which the GMAT really seems to like testing.

S1/

"Ok, we're on the losses side of the coin..."

0.5*(40 + x) = 8 + 0.5*(x) + 12 --> solve for x

20 + 0.5x = 20 + 0.5x
0 = 0 --> truism.

S2/

"Ok, we're on the wins side of the coin."

0.8*(40 + x) = 32 + 0.5*x + 18 --> solve for x

32 + 0.8x = 32 + 0.5x + 18
0.3x = 18
x = 18/0.3
x = 180/3
x = 60

Therefore he played 60 more matches, of which we won 30 and lost 30, so his overall number of wins was 32 + 30 = 62.

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 5

After winning 80% of his first 40 matches, Igby won 50   [#permalink] 23 Aug 2017, 22:25
Display posts from previous: Sort by

After winning 80% of his first 40 matches, Igby won 50

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.