NEW HERE? LEARN MORE
closeclose
Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 13:07 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 13:07
Decision Tracker
My Rewards
New posts
New comers' posts

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel

Although Bryant was better at gaining the support of rural voters than

SORT BY:
Date
Kudos
Tags:
Find Similar Topics 
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
G
mikemcgarry
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4452
Own Kudos [?]: 28572 [5]
Given Kudos: 130
Although Bryant was better at gaining the support of rural voters than [#permalink] New post   23 May 2016, 15:27
5
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

77% (01:10) correct 23% (01:17) wrong based on 288 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
Although Bryant was better at gaining the support of rural voters than was McKinley, people who believed a silver-based economy would bring prosperity, McKinley won the 1896 election on a strong industry-based vote.

(A) Bryant was better at gaining the support of rural voters than was McKinley

(B) Bryant was better gaining the support of rural voters than McKinley

(C) Bryant was better than McKinley at gaining the support of rural voters

(D) compared to McKinley, Bryant had gained the support of rural voters more effectively

(E) unlike McKinley, Bryant was better at gaining the support of rural voters

Logic is important on SC questions. If a choice is 100% grammatically correct but logically flawed, it is wrong. For a discussion of logic on the GMAT SC, as well as the OE of this particular question see:
Logical Splits on GMAT Sentence Correction
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
C
User avatar
B
nalinnair
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 Jan 2016
Status:Persevere
Posts: 107
Own Kudos [?]: 3603 [2]
Given Kudos: 94
Location: Hong Kong
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V41
GPA: 3.52
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: Although Bryant was better at gaining the support of rural voters than [#permalink] New post   23 May 2016, 22:20
2
Kudos
mikemcgarry wrote:
Although Bryant was better at gaining the support of rural voters than was McKinley, people who believed a silver-based economy would bring prosperity, McKinley won the 1896 election on a strong industry-based vote.

(A) Bryant was better at gaining the support of rural voters than was McKinley

(B) Bryant was better gaining the support of rural voters than McKinley

(C) Bryant was better than McKinley at gaining the support of rural voters

(D) compared to McKinley, Bryant had gained the support of rural voters more effectively

(E) unlike McKinley, Bryant was better at gaining the support of rural voters

Logic is important on SC questions. If a choice is 100% grammatically correct but logically flawed, it is wrong. For a discussion of logic on the GMAT SC, as well as the OE of this particular question see:
Logical Splits on GMAT Sentence Correction


(A) Bryant was better at gaining the support of rural voters than was McKinley
The modifier (people who...) following the underlined part should logically modify the rural voters and cannot modify McKinley. Also, the expression "Bryant was better than was McKinley" is incorrect. It should be Bryant was better than McKinley
(B) Bryant was better gaining the support of rural voters than McKinley
Same mistake as A. The modifier following the underlined part should logically modify the rural voters and cannot modify McKinley. Also, "Bryant was better gaining" is unidiomatic. It should be Bryant was better ar gaining.
(C) Bryant was better than McKinley at gaining the support of rural voters
This is the correct answer. The modifier following the underlined part logically modifies the rural voters. The idiomatic issues seen in A and B are avoided in this option.
(D) compared to McKinley, Bryant had gained the support of rural voters more effectively
Same mistake as A and B. The modifier following the underlined part should logically modify the rural voters.
(E) unlike McKinley, Bryant was better at gaining the support of rural voters
This does not repeat the modifier mistake in A, B and D. However, this is also incorrect. If we use comparative forms, such as "better" in this sentence, then these should be followed by "than..." better than, fewer than etc.
avatar
B
AKSU2020
Intern
Intern
Joined: 05 Feb 2020
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
Schools: Erasmus '21 HEC '22 LBS '22
Send PM
Re: Although Bryant was better at gaining the support of rural voters than [#permalink] New post   09 Mar 2020, 05:51
Hi!

I need your help to understand whether an absolute phrase can modify a noun in a clause.

I know that an absolute phrase is of noun+noun modifier form and modifies a clause in some way, and that an appositive is either a noun or a noun phrase which modifies another noun and follows the touch rule.
User avatar
B
siglon
Intern
Intern
Joined: 28 Nov 2021
Posts: 28
Own Kudos [?]: 29 [0]
Given Kudos: 21
Send PM
Re: Although Bryant was better at gaining the support of rural voters than [#permalink] New post   18 Dec 2021, 09:03
According to the lesson-videos at Magoosh, the first answer choice is 100 % grammatically correct in itself, not taking the modifier mistake into account. But according to my intuition, the sentence is only correct if you take away the second was.

"Although Bryant was better at gaining the support of rural voters than was McKinley,..."

Can someone please explain to me why my intuition is false?
User avatar
L
ExpertsGlobal5
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Posts: 5123
Own Kudos [?]: 4683 [1]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Send PM
Re: Although Bryant was better at gaining the support of rural voters than [#permalink] New post   20 Dec 2021, 07:01
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
siglon wrote:
According to the lesson-videos at Magoosh, the first answer choice is 100 % grammatically correct in itself, not taking the modifier mistake into account. But according to my intuition, the sentence is only correct if you take away the second was.

"Although Bryant was better at gaining the support of rural voters than was McKinley,..."

Can someone please explain to me why my intuition is false?


Hello siglon,

We hope this finds you well.

Having gone through the question and your query, we believe we can resolve your doubt.

The presence of "was" is not incorrect in Option A; "was" can be omitted under the rule of ellipsis, but doing so is not necessary. Likely, you feel that the presence of "was" is incorrect because omitting "was" makes the sentence a bit neater.

Remember, on the GMAT it is not wise to judge the validity of an answer choice "by ear", meaning by how it sounds. Sometimes, sentences that sound awkward or incorrect can be perfectly grammatical.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
GMAT Club Bot
gmatclubot
Re: Although Bryant was better at gaining the support of rural voters than [#permalink]
20 Dec 2021, 07:01
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne
Main navigation
GMAT Resources
Partners
MBA Resources
www.gmac.com|www.mba.com | | GMAT Club Rules | Terms and Conditions