Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
27 Jul 2022, 02:16
Kudos
Bookmarks
Vegita
I am not even sure what this option means. After-school hours is meant to be "time after school" which would pretty much be the rest of the day. So I would divide a child's day into school hours and after-school hours.
I don't know what "opportunities" in addition to after-school hours means. Hence, I ignore this option and move ahead.
Sometimes, they will write options which have all the correct words but seem rather illogical or weirdly complicated. No need to waste time on those if you do get a simple straight answer. You can choose to come back to them to evaluate them further if you do not get any other convincing answer.
12 Jun 2023, 06:49
Kudos
Bookmarks
rahulraao
D can be considered as the best option because after negating it, the claim will weaken
Posted from my mobile device
13 Apr 2024, 02:57
Kudos
Bookmarks
Conc: Children who spend all their spare time playing games have less experience in interpersonal communication than other children have.
(A) Passive activities such as watching television and listening to music do not hinder the development of communication skills in children - This answers the question, i.e., does watching TV or listening to music hinder development of comm. skills in children. However, we need the answer to the question - "Does playing computer games only lead to less comm. skils in children?". This option doesn't answer this question. Drop
(B) Most children have other opportunities, in addition to after-school hours, in which they can choose whether to play computer games or to interact with other people - What opportunities children have or if most (or less than 50%) have doesn't have bearing on the cause-effect issue asked here, i.e., does playing computer games only lead to lower comm. skills in children? Drop
(C) Children who do not spend all of their after-school hours playing computer games spend at least some of that time talking with other people - Okay, looks like a prime example to test negation technique. Let's negate to check - "Children who do not spend all of their time playing computer games spend no time talking with other people." This breaks the conclusion - How? Well the argument says, children who spend all their time playing games don't talk to others and therefore, have less comm. skills compared to their peers. However, when negated, this breaks the assumption that their peers (who don't play computer games as much) have better comm. skills because they talk/interact with other people. Keep
(D) Formal instruction contributes little or nothing to children's acquisition of communication skills - Does formal instruction contribute to children's comm skills? Not the question asked. Drop
(E) The mental skills developed through playing computer games do not contribute significantly to children's intellectual development. Does the mental skill developed in playging games translate to intellectual development? Not the question asked. Drop
(A) Passive activities such as watching television and listening to music do not hinder the development of communication skills in children - This answers the question, i.e., does watching TV or listening to music hinder development of comm. skills in children. However, we need the answer to the question - "Does playing computer games only lead to less comm. skils in children?". This option doesn't answer this question. Drop
(B) Most children have other opportunities, in addition to after-school hours, in which they can choose whether to play computer games or to interact with other people - What opportunities children have or if most (or less than 50%) have doesn't have bearing on the cause-effect issue asked here, i.e., does playing computer games only lead to lower comm. skills in children? Drop
(C) Children who do not spend all of their after-school hours playing computer games spend at least some of that time talking with other people - Okay, looks like a prime example to test negation technique. Let's negate to check - "Children who do not spend all of their time playing computer games spend no time talking with other people." This breaks the conclusion - How? Well the argument says, children who spend all their time playing games don't talk to others and therefore, have less comm. skills compared to their peers. However, when negated, this breaks the assumption that their peers (who don't play computer games as much) have better comm. skills because they talk/interact with other people. Keep
(D) Formal instruction contributes little or nothing to children's acquisition of communication skills - Does formal instruction contribute to children's comm skills? Not the question asked. Drop
(E) The mental skills developed through playing computer games do not contribute significantly to children's intellectual development. Does the mental skill developed in playging games translate to intellectual development? Not the question asked. Drop
