bestreturn
For Q3 how do we reject E?
Both of the views seems to give some history about the role of women in the union and how they were marginalized. The second paragraph seems to connect it to the wave of feminism and gender ideology
bestreturn Good question; I like how you're thinking! I'll try to address your doubt- this is actually one of the most common traps in GMAT RC primary purpose questions - confusing what the
content discusses with what the
author is doing.
Why E is Wrong?"Tracing the development of an ideology" means the
author would show how an ideology
evolved over time - like showing:
- Stage 1: Ideology begins this way
- Stage 2: It transforms to this
- Stage 3: It further evolves to this
But look at what the author actually does:
-
Paragraph 1: "Elizabeth Faue's study argues that..."
-
Paragraph 2: "Nancy F. Gabin also acknowledges... but maintains that..."
The author is
presenting two scholarly views (Faue's and Gabin's) about the same topic. Yes, these scholars discuss historical events and gender ideology, but the
author isn't tracing anything - they're just reporting what two different researchers found.
The Key Distinction:- What Faue and Gabin discuss = historical content about women in unions
- What the
author does = presents these two scholarly interpretations
Think of it this way: If I tell you "Smith thinks X" and "Jones thinks Y," I'm
presenting views, not tracing development - even if Smith and Jones are both discussing historical evolution!
Here is a framework for "Primary Purpose" questions that can help you:
When you see scholars/studies mentioned by name, check:
→ One view presented? Look for "arguing a position"
→ Two views presented neutrally? Look for "presenting views"
→ Evolution shown by author? Look for "tracing development"
The structure here (Faue says X, Gabin says Y) is classic "presenting two views."
I hope this helps! Feel free to ask any follow-up questions you may have. Good luck!