Hi
egmat, i'll appreciate your help with my analysis.
I used the following process to identify the conclusion, since I consider that question stem is not specific enough to work with it.
Is A because of B? or Is B because of A?
My two options were:
(A) Advocates of garbage disposal through burning maintain that separating garbage is impractical and unnecessary.
(B) They claim that high-temperature incineration will destroy the ingredients needed for production of dioxin.
In my opinion, A because of B is more logical than B because of A:
Advocates of garbage disposal through burning maintain that separating garbage is impractical and unnecessary
because they claim that high-temperature incineration will destroy the ingredients needed for production of dioxin.
Since the process to identify the conclusion is crucial to choose the correct the answer choice, Would you agree with my analysis?
If i'm not wrong above, I think choice A would be a better answer choice since A attacks directly the conclusion.
My assumption would be that separating garbage is impractical and unnecessary if it does not prevent dioxin formation. That's exactly what choice A states, isn't it?
Choice D would be correct if the conclusion were “ They claim that high-temperature incineration will destroy the ingredients needed for production of dioxin.”
Thanks a lot!