Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 23:37 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 23:37
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
CAMANISHPARMAR
Joined: 12 Feb 2015
Last visit: 13 Mar 2022
Posts: 1,022
Own Kudos:
2,457
 [7]
Given Kudos: 77
Posts: 1,022
Kudos: 2,457
 [7]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
NRJ11090
Joined: 19 Mar 2018
Last visit: 22 May 2024
Posts: 55
Own Kudos:
43
 [1]
Given Kudos: 53
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 600 Q42 V31
GPA: 4
WE:Operations (Energy)
GMAT 1: 600 Q42 V31
Posts: 55
Kudos: 43
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Shef08
Joined: 01 Jan 2019
Last visit: 01 Apr 2025
Posts: 84
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 111
Location: Canada
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.24
Posts: 84
Kudos: 34
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
jaisonsunny77
Joined: 05 Jan 2019
Last visit: 25 Aug 2021
Posts: 459
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 28
Posts: 459
Kudos: 381
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A) Sorting garbage would allow recovery of recyclable materials as well as prevent dioxin formation. - does not weaken the argument.
B) Incineration of plastics is suspected of causing emissions of several dangerous pollutants. - the passage deals with dioxins. ''pollutants'' are out of scope in reference to the this passage.
C) The level at which dioxin concentrations become unacceptably high is still a matter of dispute within the scientific community.
- if anything, this would tip the argument in favor of the position taken by the author. Besides, acknowledging that a dispute regarding the 'level' that is considered unacceptable exists is itself not sufficient to weaken the argument.
D) Existing incineration technology leaves residues containing sufficient amounts of lignin and chlorine for dioxin formation after burning. - From (D), we know that even with the existing incineration technologies, the threat of dioxins still looms from the left overs of the burning process. Hence, (D) weakens the argument. Therefore, (D) is the right answer choice.
E) Lignin and chlorine are found in other substances that might be burned in a garbage-disposal plant as well as paper and plastic.
- (E) tells us that there are different sources of lignin. Still, acknowledging this fact is not proof that the current incineration technology is insufficient. Hence, (E) does not weaken the argument.
User avatar
Marcost
Joined: 28 Feb 2020
Last visit: 25 Aug 2024
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 118
Location: Peru
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V31
WE:Engineering (Other)
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V31
Posts: 29
Kudos: 99
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi egmat, i'll appreciate your help with my analysis.

I used the following process to identify the conclusion, since I consider that question stem is not specific enough to work with it.
Is A because of B? or Is B because of A?

My two options were:
(A) Advocates of garbage disposal through burning maintain that separating garbage is impractical and unnecessary.
(B) They claim that high-temperature incineration will destroy the ingredients needed for production of dioxin.

In my opinion, A because of B is more logical than B because of A:

Advocates of garbage disposal through burning maintain that separating garbage is impractical and unnecessary because they claim that high-temperature incineration will destroy the ingredients needed for production of dioxin.

Since the process to identify the conclusion is crucial to choose the correct the answer choice, Would you agree with my analysis?

If i'm not wrong above, I think choice A would be a better answer choice since A attacks directly the conclusion.

My assumption would be that separating garbage is impractical and unnecessary if it does not prevent dioxin formation. That's exactly what choice A states, isn't it?

Choice D would be correct if the conclusion were “ They claim that high-temperature incineration will destroy the ingredients needed for production of dioxin.”

Thanks a lot!
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,832
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,832
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts