Last visit was: 18 May 2026, 13:10 It is currently 18 May 2026, 13:10
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
   1   2 
555-605 (Medium)|   Assumption|                                 
User avatar
stackskillz
User avatar
Joined: 28 Feb 2022
Last visit: 11 Jul 2025
Posts: 59
Own Kudos:
15
Given Kudos: 165
Posts: 59
Kudos: 15
Although there is no record of poet Edmund Spenser's parentage, we do 20 Mar 2024, 16:13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conc: Of these, the last was likely the least affluent of the three—and most likely Edmund's father.

(A) Anybody in sixteenth century London who made clothing professionally would have had to be a member of the Merchant Tailors' Guild - Answers the question - Were all tailors in the 16th century affliated with the Merchant Tailors' Guild? Whether the answer the this question is yes or no, doesn't impact the conclusion of the passage. Drop 

(B) The fact that Edmund Spenser attended the Merchant Tailors' School did not necessarily mean that he planned to become a tailor. - What Edmund planned to become doesn't seem to complete the intended logic, i.e., John Spenser is the father of Edmund Spenser because.... Drop

(C) No member of the Guild could become Guild warden in sixteenth century London unless he was a gentleman - Answers the question - What does it take to becomes Guild Warden? Relevant to the passage.. not really. Drop

(D) Most of those whose fathers were members of the Merchant Tailors' Guild were students at the Merchant Tailors' School. Doesn't answer the question as to why John is the father of Edmund and why not others. Drop

(E) The Merchant Tailors' School did not reduce its fees for the children of the more affluent Guild members. The passage does state that John Spenser was the least affluent of the three and Edmund was enlisted as a scholar at a reduced price. This seems to fill the necessary gap in the premise. Keep
User avatar
Although there is no record of poet Edmund Spenser's parentage, we do 20 May 2024, 14:52
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AnishPassi
The Story

Although there is no record of poet Edmund Spenser’s parentage, we do know that as a youth Spenser attended the Merchant Tailors’ School in London for a period between 1560 and 1570 – There is no record of who Spenser’s parents were. We know the school he attended as a youth, though. (Wonder what the school has to do with parentage. Let’s see …)

Records from this time indicate that the Merchant Tailors’ Guild then had only three members named Spenser: Robert Spenser, listed as a gentleman; Nicholas Spenser, elected the Guild’s Warden in 1568; and John Spenser, listed as a “journeyman cloth-maker.” – Records indicate that the school’s Guild has three members named Spenser in the time period when Edmund attended the school.
The three Spensers:
    1. A gentlemen
    2. The Guild’s warden
    3. A “journeyman cloth-maker”
(I don’t see a connection with Spenser’s parentage yet. These three weird titles don’t even mean much to me. Let’s read on …)


Of these, the last was likely the least affluent of the three—and most likely Edmund’s father, since school accounting records list Edmund as a scholar who attended the school at a reduced fee. – John, the “journeyman cloth-maker”, was probably the least affluent Spenser.
(No basis given for this. Perhaps “gentlemen” and wardens were typically more affluent than “journeymen cloth-makers”.)

John was most probably Edmund’s father.
Why?
Because Edmund was listed as a scholar who paid a reduced fee, according to the school’s accounting records.


Author’s logic:
John was probably Edmund’s father (main point).
Because (basis):
    1. In the time period when Edmund attended MTS, Only three Spenser’s were members of the school’s Guild:
      – “a gentleman”
      – a warden
      – a “journeymen cloth-maker” (John)
    2. John was probably the least affluent of the three
    3. Edmund had a partial scholarship and paid a reduced fee.

Edmund on partial scholarship + John likely the least affluent Spencer in the Guild ==> John was most likely Edmund’s father.


Gap(s) in logic:
The argument seems pretty weak.
    1. Were parents of all the students attending the MTS members of the MT Guild?
      a. Were parents of all students attending the MTS, Merchant Tailors?
      b. Were all Merchant Tailors members of the MT Guild?

    The author seems to have somehow already decided that Edmund Spenser’s father was one of the three Spenser’s listed in the MT Guild. If Spenser’s father was not even a Merchant Tailor, or at least if somehow he was not listed in the Merchant Tailor Guild, it would not make sense for the author to pursue an argument along the lines that Edmund’s father is one of the three Spenser’s listed in the Guild.
    2. Couldn’t scholarships be granted to kids of affluent parents as well? Perhaps a merit-based scholarship.
    3. Couldn’t “gentlemen” and “wardens” be not-affluent? Were “journeymen cloth-makers” typically less affluent than wardens and gentlemen?


Question Stem


Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A standard assumptions question. We’re looking for an assumption that is required for the argument. So, the correct answer choice should:

    1. Support the argument
    2. Be necessary for the argument. i.e., the argument’s logic should break down if the answer choice were not true (negation).

Each of the gaps we’ve discussed is linked with an assumption. e.g.:

    1. All the students who attended MTS had a parent who was a member of the MT Guild.
    2. Scholarships were typically granted based only on financial need.
    3. “Journeymen cloth-makers” were typically less affluent than ‘gentlemen’ and ‘wardens’.


Answer choice analysis


A. Anybody in sixteenth century London who made clothing professionally would have had to be a member of the Merchant Tailors' Guild.
Incorrect. We are talking about cloth-makers and Merchant Tailors. So, if all clothing professionals in that time period were members of the MT Guild, my confidence does go up marginally in the argument. I do believe more then that perhaps Edmund’s father would have been a part of the Guild.

However, while for the argument, it is necessary that all students of MTS had a parent as a member of the Guild, is it necessary that all professional cloth-makers were members of the Guild in 16th century London?

No, it isn’t.

Even if some professional cloth-makers were not members of the guild (negation), the argument doesn’t break down. As long as those cloth-makers with children who were students of the MTS (subset of all cloth-makers) were members of the Guild, the argument still remains valid.

B . The fact that Edmund Spenser attended the Merchant Tailors' School did not necessarily mean that he planned to become a tailor.
Incorrect. We are given that Edmund became a poet later. So, yes, the fact that Edmund Spenser attended the Merchant Tailors’ School did not necessarily mean that he planned to become a tailor.

This statement seems true in general. But that is irrelevant. We need to check whether the answer choice is an assumption.

What Edmund’s plans were with regard to his career, is irrelevant to the argument about who was likely Edmund’s father. The statement has no impact on the argument. Moreover, the argument doesn’t depend on Edmund’s career aspirations and intentions while he attended MTS.

C . No member of the Guild could become Guild warden in sixteenth century London unless he was a gentleman.
Incorrect. The answer choice is basically stating that all Guild wardens were gentlemen.

There is nothing mentioned in the passage about the affluence of gentlemen. So even if all Guild wardens were gentlemen, I don’t learn anything about whether they were more affluent than journeymen cloth-makers. The statement has no impact on the argument.

Since the statement doesn’t strengthen the argument, we can already safely reject it.

To be doubly sure, let’s check what happens to the argument when we negate this answer choice and add to the argument. Negation: Members of the Guild could become Guild wardens in the sixteenth century London even if they were not gentlemen.

So, even if some wardens were not gentlemen, wardens and gentlemen could still be likely more affluent than journeymen cloth-makers. The negation does not breakdown the argument.


D. Most of those whose fathers were members of the Merchant Tailors' Guild were students at the Merchant Tailors' School.
Incorrect. This answer choice is tempting.
However, it is actually the reverse of what we need.
We need: all students had a parent who was a member of the Guild.
What the answer choice is talking about: Most children with fathers in the Guild attended MTS.

So, all students need a parent to be a member of the Guild. But that doesn’t mean that most fathers in the Guild had children who attended MTS.

Say, 5,000 students attended MTS in the given time period. Now, for the argument, those 5,000 students need their fathers to be members of the Guild.
On the flip side, say the Guild had 20,000 members who had children. Did most of these children need to be students at the MTS? No.

The statement has practically no impact on the argument. Moreover, is it necessary that most of the people who’s fathers were Guild members were MTS students? It isn’t.
The Guild could very well have a lot of members whose children did not attend MTS.

In the following official question too, one of the answer choices (B) links the right things, but from the wrong direction. Official question for additional practice: Technically a given category of insurance policy is underpriced.


E. The Merchant Tailors' School did not reduce its fees for the children of the more affluent Guild members.
 Correct. Aha! This one is in line with one of the predictions we made initially.

The author’s logic is that John is likely the least affluent Spenser in the Guild and Edmund studied at a reduced fee (scholarship), that’s why John is most likely Edmund’s father.
If the MTS reduced the fees for children of the more affluent Guild members as well (negation), then Edmund’s father could have been one of the other two more affluent Spensers. Thus, the author’s logic falls flat.
Show more


Hey anish,

Thank you for the explanation.

Looking at the option D -

Isn't the option: that most fathers in the Guild had children who attended MTS, mildly strenthening / increasing confidence that Edmund's father is part of MTG?

If we negate this option: 'None of those whose fathers were members of the Merchant Tailors' Guild were students at the Merchant Tailors' School', in short, none of the child of MTG's studies at MTS, which breaks the argument. If this is true, there's no way we can see Edmund's father being part of the MTG.

Could you please explain what I'm missing here, thank you!

­
User avatar
Nihal_Abdurahiman
User avatar
Joined: 21 Apr 2024
Last visit: 23 Jan 2026
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
7
Given Kudos: 10
Location: India
Schools: NUS '26 ESADE'26 HBS '26
GMAT Focus 1: 595 Q76 V81 DI82
GPA: 3.13
Schools: NUS '26 ESADE'26 HBS '26
GMAT Focus 1: 595 Q76 V81 DI82
Posts: 15
Kudos: 7
Although there is no record of poet Edmund Spenser's parentage, we do 28 Nov 2024, 00:16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
How can you assume this child at Tailors’ School -> Parent in Tailors’ Guild but not the other way around? What gave you away that it can't be Parent in Tailors’ Guild -> child at Tailors’ School

EMPOWERgmatVerbal
EMPOWERgmat Enhanced Explanation:

Type: Assumption
Boil It Down: Attend at reduced fee -> Edmund’s father was the least affluent of the 3
Missing Information: There is no other reason than being poorer that the fee would have been reduced. The reasoning also assumes: child at Tailors’ School -> Parent in Tailors’ Guild
Goal: Find the option that presents information this argument requires for the logic to hold.

Analysis: This prompt leaves out a great deal of information in the evidence, such as how we magically are left to assume a connection between Edmund Spencer’s attendance at the school and that Edmund’s father would have to be a member of the guild. The prompt also presumes that Edmund went to the school on a reduced fee because he came from a lesser affluent household, and that based on that assumption, Edmund’s father would have had to have been John because he was the least affluent of the three Spensers.

A We’re not concerned with ANYONE who made clothing professionally having to be a member of the guild, we’re concerned with the notion that: student is at the school → The father was a member of the guild. This option goes way too extreme.

B Whether Edmund did or did not plan to become a tailor is in no way something that this argument hinges on. The argument works either way, so this couldn’t be an assumption made in this argument.

C The argument doesn’t hinge on the parameters for someone to become a guild warden. TOTALLY irrelevant.

D This option gets it backwards. The argument isn’t assuming that if you had a father in the Guild, that you were a student. It’s that if you were a student, then you had a father in the guild.

E Yes! This option is absolutely assumed by the reasoning. The argument requires that only those who came from a lesser affluent family would receive a fee reduction, or in other words, the school did not reduce its fees for those who were more affluent. Let’s say that the school was also willing to reduce fees for academic merit? Then the whole argument that we can use the fee reduction to say that Edmund’s father had to have been the least affluent of the three collapses.
Show more
avatar
ManifestDreamMBA
avatar
Joined: 17 Sep 2024
Last visit: 21 Feb 2026
Posts: 1,387
Own Kudos:
901
Given Kudos: 243
Posts: 1,387
Kudos: 901
Although there is no record of poet Edmund Spenser's parentage, we do 18 Aug 2025, 11:56
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
One thing to keep in mind is to focus on the conclusion but not to leave the reasoning for drawing the conclusion behind. Author assumes since school accounting records list Edmund as a scholar who attended the school at a reduced fee, then John is the father.

A) Anybody in sixteenth century London who made clothing professionally would have had to be a member of the Merchant Tailors' Guild.
If everyone is a member or not it doesn't matter. Say a few are not, it still doesn't fit in to necessary conclude the reduced fee and findings about Edmund's father

(B) The fact that Edmund Spenser attended the Merchant Tailors' School did not necessarily mean that he planned to become a tailor.
What he plans to become isn't the concern of the argument

(C) No member of the Guild could become Guild warden in sixteenth century London unless he was a gentleman.
Ok, this gives a constraint for Guild warden selection. But we don't need this to draw the conclusion

(D) Most of those whose fathers were members of the Merchant Tailors' Guild were students at the Merchant Tailors' School.
This doesn't talk about the reduced fee, not the necessary assumption

(E) The Merchant Tailors' School did not reduce its fees for the children of the more affluent Guild members.­
This makes sense. The assumption that school did not reduce its fees for the children of the more affluent Guild members must be true to draw the conclusion that John, the least affluent among the 3 is the father
notwithstanding
Although there is no record of poet Edmund Spenser's parentage, we do know that as a youth Spenser attended the Merchant Tailors' School in London for a period between 1560 and 1570. Records from this time indicate that the Merchant Tailors' Guild then had only three members named Spenser: Robert Spenser, listed as a gentleman; Nicholas Spenser, elected the Guild's Warden in 1568; and John Spenser, listed as a "journeyman cloth-maker." Of these, the last was likely the least affluent of the three—and most likely Edmund's father, since school accounting records list Edmund as a scholar who attended the school at a reduced fee.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) Anybody in sixteenth century London who made clothing professionally would have had to be a member of the Merchant Tailors' Guild.

(B) The fact that Edmund Spenser attended the Merchant Tailors' School did not necessarily mean that he planned to become a tailor.

(C) No member of the Guild could become Guild warden in sixteenth century London unless he was a gentleman.

(D) Most of those whose fathers were members of the Merchant Tailors' Guild were students at the Merchant Tailors' School.

(E) The Merchant Tailors' School did not reduce its fees for the children of the more affluent Guild members.­
Show more
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7393 posts
AbhishekP220108
579 posts
bhanu29
368 posts