PReciSioN wrote:
"The museum’s curator recommended purchasing more twenty-first-century East Asian art—particularly abstract (nonrepresentational) paintings and sculptures—because the museum’s collection is weakest in that area."
Is "Particularly abstract paintings & sculptures" part of his 1st recommendation (21st cent. EA art) or is it a 2nd SEPARATE recommendation.
If it is part of the same recommendation, then option-A: "Painting of girl’s face, in shades of blue and red, acrylic and oil on canvas, 2006", doesn't comply with his recommendation as the painting is not abstract.
If it is a different recommendation, then option-C "Fish-shaped vase with dragon head, jade, 1849" , could also be the answer for sculpture, considering it satisfies the jade recommendation of the marketing executive and the (separate) sculpture recommendation of the curator.
*Also, when we say "Abstract paintings and sculptures" in the context of the passage, I presume that abstract refers to only paintings and not paintings & sculptures both?
Would really appreciate your help!
The part set off by dashes ("particularly...") is a
subset of twenty-first-century East Asian art.
- A work of art MUST be twenty-first-century East Asian art in order to satisfy the curator's recommendation.
- If that piece of twenty-first-century East Asian art is ALSO an abstract (nonrepresentational) painting or sculpture, that would make the curator extra happy (since he/she would like to see more of those in particular).
- But as long as it's twenty-first-century East Asian art, that satisfies the curator's basic requirement.
This is similar to saying, "I want to eat a lot of fruit -- particularly citrus fruit." Perhaps MOST of the fruit you eat will be citrus, since that's the type of fruit you want the most. But that doesn't necessarily mean that you'll ONLY eat citrus fruit.
Also, if the part in dashes were required, NONE of the answer choices in the first column would work, so that interpretation cannot be correct. Similarly, if we treat the part in dashes as a separate and unrelated requirement, then we'd have multiple possible answers for the second column -- that can't be the case either, so the interpretation above must be correct (and makes your question about "abstract" irrelevant).
I hope that helps!