Last visit was: 22 Apr 2026, 22:19 It is currently 22 Apr 2026, 22:19
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
jppeka
Joined: 04 May 2012
Last visit: 13 Oct 2016
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
16
 [16]
Given Kudos: 5
GMAT 1: 580 Q47 V20
GPA: 3.8
Products:
GMAT 1: 580 Q47 V20
Posts: 1
Kudos: 16
 [16]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
9
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
RatneshS
Joined: 14 May 2014
Last visit: 13 Jul 2017
Posts: 49
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 296
Location: India
Schools: Mannheim"17
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.44
Schools: Mannheim"17
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V31
Posts: 49
Kudos: 34
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,439
Own Kudos:
79,389
 [1]
Given Kudos: 484
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,439
Kudos: 79,389
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 11,229
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,229
Kudos: 44,996
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jppeka
Animal control workers in the forest land around Forestville have been trying to reduce the population of the Wumpus, an aggressive rodent that has been attacking smaller animals in the area. Local residents believe the Wumpus was introduced to the forest about 50 years ago, when a tourist brought a pair of pet Wumpuses that escaped into the wild. Recently, archaeologists digging in the forest have found skeletons of the Wumpus that date back over 2,000 years. This discovery shows that ___.

(A) even if the Wumpus is raised as a pet, it is able to survive and reproduce in the wild
(B) the Wumpus is actually native to the forest, so animal control workers shouldn’t try to reduce its population
(C) Wumpuses have only been attacking smaller animals recently due to a decline in the availability of their main food source
(D) if left unchecked, the Wumpus population will pose a threat to the native ecosystem of the forest
(E) local residents are correct about the origin of the Wumpus in the area

Here is my line of reasoning :
=Premises=> Reduce Wumpus (aggressive rodent) + believe brought 50 years ago + new evidence skeletons back over 2,000 years
=Therefore=> (1>>A) Wumpus can survive in the wild whatever their origin -OR- (2>>C) the attacks of Wumpus are just recent b/c of food scarcity.

OA: later

The beginning of the sentence ---the DISCOVERY shows that...
Clearly the answer has to be SOMETHING to do with the discovery..


ONLY B and E fit in..
E is out because it speaks opposite of what is true..

so B is the most relevant, BUT the addition of "so animal control workers shouldn’t try to reduce its population" does not add to the CHOICE and is totaly irrelevant and out of place
User avatar
ravisinghal
Joined: 12 Aug 2013
Last visit: 28 Jul 2019
Posts: 41
Own Kudos:
Posts: 41
Kudos: 26
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I will go with B..

Though not the very good answer but best in the lot.

Discovery indicates that the animal is native to the forest and no other option suggests that.
User avatar
EpilepticLearner
Joined: 24 Feb 2019
Last visit: 03 Feb 2020
Posts: 43
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 73
Posts: 43
Kudos: 25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A Makes sense. The skeleton was found in the forest, so it used to be a fully autonomous wild animal.

B. Why on earth would the discovery of an ancient skeleton suddenly change people's mind about reducing the wumpus population or not?

C. Makes sense. We could imagine that the wumpu's main food source disappearing, the animal was forced to find food elsewhere, in places where humans noticed them. Thus explaining why locals had been unaware of the wumpus presence.
avatar
ballest127
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Last visit: 27 Dec 2021
Posts: 105
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 599
Posts: 105
Kudos: 44
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi VeritasKarishma,

Thank you for your kind explanation.

However, in B, how can we be sure that the Wumpus is actually native to the forest, just because archaeologists digging in the forest have found skeletons of the Wumpus that date back over 2,000 years?

It could be the case that the Wumpus had been introduced into the forest by that time.
In this case, it is not native to the Forestville.

Please explain.

Thank you.
avatar
bluetrain
Joined: 30 Aug 2017
Last visit: 05 May 2024
Posts: 67
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 250
Location: Korea, Republic of
GMAT 1: 700 Q51 V31
GPA: 3.68
GMAT 1: 700 Q51 V31
Posts: 67
Kudos: 19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This question is problematic.
in (B), there is no clear correlation between "trying to reduce the population of the Wumpus" and "Local residents believe the Wumpus was introduced to the forest about 50 years ago"

To make (B) as a right answer, there should be a clue, which explain certain correlation between two sentences.
so, I will go (A) instead of (B)
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,439
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 484
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,439
Kudos: 79,389
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ballest127
Hi VeritasKarishma,

Thank you for your kind explanation.

However, in B, how can we be sure that the Wumpus is actually native to the forest, just because archaeologists digging in the forest have found skeletons of the Wumpus that date back over 2,000 years?

It could be the case that the Wumpus had been introduced into the forest by that time.
In this case, it is not native to the Forestville.

Please explain.

Thank you.

The 2000 year old skeleton shows that it was not "recently introduced by tourists (50 years ago)". It has been in the forest for a long long time. 2000 years is a long time in terms of human settlements. We don't know whether humans were there in Forestville 2000 years ago. The intent of the argument is quite clear - that Wumpus is native to Forestville.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,418
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,418
Kudos: 1,009
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
499 posts
358 posts