Hi laborumpossimus,Good news: your approach is
completely valid, and it actually gives the right answer. Let me walk through your own numbers so you can see it.
You chose:
- Bob's speed =
60, Ann's speed =
80 - check: 80 = 60 + 1⁄3·60 = 60 + 20 ✓
- Ann's distance =
240, Bob's distance =
120 - check: 240 = 2 × 120 ✓
Both conditions in the question are satisfied, so your picks are legal. Now just compute the times:
- Bob's time = 120 ÷ 60 =
2 hours
- Ann's time = 240 ÷ 80 =
3 hours
Ratio of Ann's time to Bob's time =
3 : 2 - answer
B. So your method didn't just "work," it lands exactly on the official answer.
The one rule for plugging inThe only thing you must guarantee is that your chosen numbers obey
every constraint at once - which yours do. As long as that holds, you'll get the same ratio no matter what specific numbers you pick.
Notice that's exactly why Bunuel's smaller numbers (Bob:
3 mph,
6 miles; Ann:
4 mph,
12 miles) give the same
3 : 2. The actual values wash out - only the
ratio survives - which is what makes plugging in safe for this kind of question.
Quick way to trust it: try one more legal set, say Bob =
30 mph over
90 miles, Ann =
40 mph over
180 miles. Bob's time =
3 hr, Ann's time =
4.5 hr -
4.5 : 3 =
3 : 2 again. Same answer every time.
So keep using this approach - just always double-check that each chosen number respects all the given relationships before you compute.
Answer: Blaborumpossimus
I tried plugging in numbers like assuming bbos speed as 60
And a,s speed as 80
And took 240 as distance for a and
120 miles as distance for b
Is this approach appropriate?