Kavicogsci
Hi - Got this option wrong and here was my reasoning
GMATNinjaTwo MartyMurrayA. Whether any of the contents of the site will significantly deteriorate before the anticipated technology is available
B. Whether there will continue to be improvements on the relevant technology
Eliminated option 1 because it says 'any of the contents' what if its fine if a trivial content of the site deteriotes, that could still help us maximise info on imp parts?
Chose Option 2 because passage says tech 'likey' to improve - but if I answer No to this answer choice there is no need to wait and if i choose yes then makes sense to wait?
Let me know
When answering CR questions, we sometimes have to pick up on subtle details and make a call regarding what the question writer was thinking.
In the case of this question, to analyze (B), we have to notice that the passage says the following:
It is likely that this technology will advance considerably in the near future, allowing archaeologists to gather more information than is currently possible.So, the idea of the plan is that archeologists can wait until "the near future" to use "considerably" more advanced technology.
Then, (B) says the following:
B. Whether there will continue to be improvements on the relevant technologyConsidering "the near future" in the passage and "there will continue to be improvements" in (B), we can make the call that the idea of (B) is whether "there will continue to be improvements" AFTER the improvements in the near future.
In other words, the passage is about near term improvement, and (B) is about a somewhat different topic, whether improvements will continue past the near term.
Using that intepretation, we can decide that (B) is not relevant because, regardless of whether there will continue to be improvements over the long term, as long as improvements occur "in the near future," the plan should achieve its goal.
Having eliminated (B) that way, we can choose (A) because, even though it's true that the plan may work even if some minor contents of the site will deteriorate, the fact that some of the contents will deteriorate CASTS DOUBT on the conclusion that the plan will achieve its goal since the contents that will deteriorate may be important content.
After all, information that weakens the case for plan doesn't have to prove that the plan won't work. It has only to cast doubt on the prospects of the plan.
Also, if the answer to (A) is, no, none of the contents will deteriorate, then we can be more confident that the plan will achieve its goal since that means that no contents, including important contents, will deteriorate significantly. In other words, that information makes us more convinced that the plan will work.
So, (A) is the best choice.