betterscore
As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and sturdier than concrete. Moreover, in tropical areas bamboo is a much less expensive construction material than either steel or concrete and is always readily available. In tropical areas, therefore, building with bamboo makes better economic sense than building with steel or concrete, except where land values are high.
Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the exception noted above?
(A) Buildings constructed of bamboo are less likely to suffer earthquake damage than are steel and concrete buildings.
(B) Bamboo is unsuitable as a building material for multistory buildings.
(C) In order to protect it from being damaged by termites and beetles, bamboo must be soaked, at some expense, in a preservative.
(D) In some tropical areas, bamboo is used to make the scaffolding that is used during large construction projects.
(E) Bamboo growing in an area where land values are increasing is often
Its important to note that, answering a verbal question is more like negating all the wrong answers.
stimulus: bamboo strong as steel and sturdier than concrete, tropic areas they are < expensive. So, where land values are high,we cannot use bamboo.
But using bamboo should be economical. But why not?
a. earthquake - irrelevant. question is clearly talking about economical and bamboos
b. Bamboo unsuitable as a building material for multistory buildings. - could make sense. Higher land values, more multistory buildings. No bamboo. explains.
c. again irrelevant - [you cannot connect termites with high land values]
d. so what they use for scaffolding. it still doesnt talk about constructing buildings.
e. again irrelevant - so if land values are increasing and bamboo growing. doesnt talk about bamboo being used for constructing buildings
Please also note in such type of questions - the above is explained by which of the following types, usually NEW INFORMATION is better suited.