Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 08:19 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 08:19
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
555-605 Level|   Resolve Paradox|                              
User avatar
Mehemmed
Joined: 09 Apr 2017
Last visit: 19 Dec 2022
Posts: 110
Own Kudos:
50
 [3]
Given Kudos: 135
Status:Turning my handicaps into assets
Posts: 110
Kudos: 50
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,784
 [5]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,784
 [5]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
76,994
 [5]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 76,994
 [5]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mSKR
Joined: 14 Aug 2019
Last visit: 10 Mar 2024
Posts: 1,290
Own Kudos:
938
 [1]
Given Kudos: 381
Location: Hong Kong
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GPA: 3.81
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
Posts: 1,290
Kudos: 938
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
(B) Bamboo is unsuitable as a building material for multistory buildings.
>> It is NOT NECESSARY that there would be multistory buildings AT PLACES where land values are high.
For B to be correct i need to assume that high buildings would be built at areas where land values are high


Quote:
(E) Bamboo growing in an area where land values are increasing is often cleared to make way for construction
>>The purpose is to clear way for construction. It can be construction of ROADS, Government Buildings (hospitals etc.) or buildings etc. so purpose for these constructions may not necessarily of ECONOMIC sense, but the purpose could be helping citizens etc. OR if home buildings constructions with multi story buildings then also it is not about Economic sense.


For B , i need to assume something but for E i don't need to assume extra. so why not i choose E.?

VeritasKarishma GMATNinja egmat abhimahna
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
76,994
 [4]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 76,994
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
imSKR
Quote:
(B) Bamboo is unsuitable as a building material for multistory buildings.
>> It is NOT NECESSARY that there would be multistory buildings AT PLACES where land values are high.
For B to be correct i need to assume that high buildings would be built at areas where land values are high


Quote:
(E) Bamboo growing in an area where land values are increasing is often cleared to make way for construction
>>The purpose is to clear way for construction. It can be construction of ROADS, Government Buildings (hospitals etc.) or buildings etc. so purpose for these constructions may not necessarily of ECONOMIC sense, but the purpose could be helping citizens etc. OR if home buildings constructions with multi story buildings then also it is not about Economic sense.


For B , i need to assume something but for E i don't need to assume extra. so why not i choose E.?

VeritasKarishma GMATNinja egmat abhimahna

If bamboo growing in the area is removed, you actually have bamboo available. Then why would it not be appropriate to use, option (E) doesn't tell us. Option (B) tells us that it is not usable for multi-storey buildings. As I said before, it doesn't matter whether you actually make multi storeys - it is just one reason why bamboo may not be suitable.
User avatar
prashant0099
Joined: 25 Jan 2016
Last visit: 20 Dec 2020
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
30
 [1]
Given Kudos: 65
Location: India
Schools: Alberta '23
GPA: 3.9
WE:Engineering (Energy)
Schools: Alberta '23
Posts: 48
Kudos: 30
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OG 21 : explanationn is here

Situation : Bamboo is as strong as steel and sturdier than concrete when used as a construction material. In tropical areas, bamboo is much less expensive and is always readily available.

Reasoning What explains the exception specified in the conclusion? The argument's conclusion is that in tropical areas bamboo is a more economical building material than steel or concrete, except where land values are high. The information in the passage makes clear why bamboo is a more economical building material in tropical areas than are concrete or steel. So, the question is: Why must an exception be made for areas where land values are high? Multistory buildings are particularly desirable in areas where land values are high, but bamboo may not be suitable for such buildings.

Correct. Multistory buildings provide a greater area of floor space for a given site area, and in that sense are more economical. A single-story building with the same floor space will occupy a much bigger site, so the higher the land values, the more likely it is that a multistory building will be built on that land. Thus, given this information, bamboo is less suitable for areas where land values are high.
User avatar
Fdambro294
Joined: 10 Jul 2019
Last visit: 20 Aug 2025
Posts: 1,350
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,656
Posts: 1,350
Kudos: 742
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja

AndrewN

MartyTargetTestPrep

Any other expert who feels like chiming in....

For me, this question falls under the purview of that famous Sherlock Holmes quote (adjusted to our present circumstances):
“Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be [the correct answer].”


Recently, I’ve noticed a few questions in the Official Guide (not just in the Verbal portion) that seem.....a little different?

I was also informed by someone who used to work in the textbook publishing industry that in order to put out a new, updated version of a textbook there is a minimum “25% new material” threshold that must be met.

I have no clue whether it is a fact and I haven’t bothered to look it up. Regardless of whether it is a fact, do you think that GMAC would ever include questions that were retired because of “issues” with the responses they received? If they have to meet a threshold to put out a new issue and the cost to make a new question is a lot (what is it, $4,000 on average?), then it kind of makes a bit of sense to throw some of these plagued questions into “The Guide.”


Recently it’s been a question nagging at me. Would they be THAT.....not nice? 😀

I know, I know, there are many more important things to worry about. However, I’ve seen responses from experts in which they accept that the answer is the “best answer” and do their best to come up with a coherent explanation that can be utilized in answering future questions. I’m not saying this is one of those questions (in fact I chose a question I answered correctly so as to not come across bitter). However, there have been other, posted questions in which we just kind of have to say, “OK, it is what it is. The question is Official.”

When I started, I firmly believed there was an objectively correct answer for each question (at least that was what I had been told). Over the course of too many months, I’ve adjusted that belief.

In the case of this question, I wonder:

If an incorrect answer choice were replaced with something a LITTLE bit stronger, would we be talking about how B is wrong because it requires one to make too many unwarranted assumptions beyond the facts given?


We truly are looking for the “best” answer each time......

Edit: I wonder what fun, new adventures the soon-to-be-released Official Guide has in store for us.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,784
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,784
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Fdambro294

I was also informed by someone who used to work in the textbook publishing industry that in order to put out a new, updated version of a textbook there is a minimum “25% new material” threshold that must be met.

I have no clue whether it is a fact and I haven’t bothered to look it up. Regardless of whether it is a fact, do you think that GMAC would ever include questions that were retired because of “issues” with the responses they received? If they have to meet a threshold to put out a new issue and the cost to make a new question is a lot (what is it, $4,000 on average?), then it kind of makes a bit of sense to throw some of these plagued questions into “The Guide.”


Recently it’s been a question nagging at me. Would they be THAT.....not nice? 😀
When Wiley releases new official guides, there's usually 15-20% new questions, for whatever it's worth. :)

Would they release flawed questions? Certainly not intentionally. We can get deeply philosophical about what it means to have "flawed questions" or "flawed exams" -- and after half of a doctorate in psychometrics, 20+ years of tutoring, and a bunch of policy-related consulting work, I have some pretty intense criticisms of standardized exams and how we use them -- but GMAC spends thousands of dollars per question just to avoid producing flawed questions in the first place.

Do some truly, unambiguously flawed questions (where the OA isn't bulletproof) slip past all of the editing and testing? Sure, but they're exceedingly rare. Anything you see in the OGs underwent the same testing, so you're not likely to run across questions with OAs that are "wrong" on any reasonable level.

Fdambro294

I know, I know, there are many more important things to worry about.
Agreed! It's fun to poke holes in the test, but it isn't going to help much. I'm not making this up: one of my PhD advisors (before I came to my senses and went back to teaching) considered himself a philosopher of psychometrics, and I honestly enjoy making broad critiques of standardized exams, on both philosophical and technical grounds. I could tell you a very long story about why GMAC should consider switching from a three-parameter logistic model to a four-parameter model, and I could also say a ton about why MBA programs are desperately misusing and misinterpreting the GMAT.

But none of that would be remotely useful if your goal is to get a good score. (Though it would be incredibly useful if your goal is to cure insomnia! :tongue_opt3 ) Sadly, test-takers are probably best served by accepting the GMAT with all of its flaws, and just "playing the game" so that you can move on to more important things in life. :)

Fdambro294

In the case of this question, I wonder:

If an incorrect answer choice were replaced with something a LITTLE bit stronger, would we be talking about how B is wrong because it requires one to make too many unwarranted assumptions beyond the facts given?
Again, I don't think this hypothetical is useful. Notice that the exam DIDN'T give you stronger incorrect answer choices. If they had, then the OA might have become ambiguous, and then the question never would have survived the (expensive!) vetting process, and it wouldn't have made it into the test or the OG.

I'm not sure if any of that is remotely helpful, but I hope it was... mildly entertaining or something? :|
User avatar
parth2424
Joined: 11 Oct 2020
Last visit: 17 Dec 2021
Posts: 35
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 122
Posts: 35
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
stuck between b & c

B has the problem of assuming that places where land values are high have multistory buildings.


but c can be eliminated as --> TERMITES AND BEETLES CAN BE AT BOTH PLACES AND IF WE ARE READY TO BUILD IN THE TROPICALS WITH BAMBOO BY PAYING THE EXTRA COST , THEN WHY CAN'T WE PAY THE SAME AND BUILD IN PLACES WHERE LAND VALUES ARE HIGH.. -->> DOES NOTHING TO EXPLAIN WHY BAMBOO SHOULD NOT BE USED IN PLACES WITH HIGH LAND VALUES.
User avatar
GmatKnightTutor
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 31 Jan 2020
Last visit: 01 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,228
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 18
Posts: 5,228
Kudos: 1,568
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMAT Critical Reasoning: The Passage is always Correct (Bamboo)

User avatar
hassan233
Joined: 28 Dec 2020
Last visit: 16 Feb 2022
Posts: 52
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 25
Location: United States
Posts: 52
Kudos: 55
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I striked out B because why would there be multistory buildings in tropical areas?

In tropical areas, therefore, building with bamboo makes better economic sense than building with steel or concrete, except where land values are high.

Like you would not consider NYC as a tropical area.
User avatar
VP1030
Joined: 10 Mar 2022
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 32
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 665 Q88 V78 DI83
GMAT Focus 2: 675 Q88 V84 DI78
GPA: 8.48
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My thoughts on option E - Bamboo is being cut for construction where land value is high/increasing. Since its being cut, it is not readily available. Hence, it is not a suitable choice.

Besides, When I was mulling over the options, I thought I should not assume that the lands of high value (in option B) would necessarily be used for construction of multistory building. I ended up choosing E or B.

It would be really helpful if the expert could tell why my reasoning is incorrect.
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,476
Own Kudos:
5,579
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,430
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,476
Kudos: 5,579
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VP1030
My thoughts on option E - Bamboo is being cut for construction where land value is high/increasing. Since its being cut, it is not readily available. Hence, it is not a suitable choice.
Notice that the passage says the following:

Moreover, in tropical areas bamboo ... is always readily available.

So, we can see that, even though, as choice (E) says, "Bamboo growing in an area where land values are increasing is often cleared to make way for construction," bamboo is still readily available in those areas. So, lack of availability can't be the reason why building with bamboo does not make better economic sense than building with steel or concrete where land values are high.

Quote:
Besides, When I was mulling over the options, I thought I should not assume that the lands of high value (in option B) would necessarily be used for construction of multistory building. I ended up choosing E or B.

It would be really helpful if the expert could tell why my reasoning is incorrect.
In answering Critical Reasoning questions, we should not make unwarranted assumptions, but we can use common knowledge and make logical connections.

In this case, it's logical that, where land values are high, buildings will tend to be multistory. We don't know for sure that they will be, but since it's likely that they will be, choice (B) provides a likely explanation for the exception. Meanwhile, none of the other choices work at all. So, (B) is the best answer.
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
76,994
 [2]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 76,994
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VP1030
My thoughts on option E - Bamboo is being cut for construction where land value is high/increasing. Since its being cut, it is not readily available. Hence, it is not a suitable choice.

Besides, When I was mulling over the options, I thought I should not assume that the lands of high value (in option B) would necessarily be used for construction of multistory building. I ended up choosing E or B.

It would be really helpful if the expert could tell why my reasoning is incorrect.

Think about it - when bamboo is cleared from an area, it's actually right there available to be used for construction. Besides, since it is easily available, even if that piece of land doesn't have it anymore, it would be growing on other pieces of land which are not that premium.
(B) gives you one reason why bamboo may not be suitable material for construction on high value land. Generally speaking, one would expect high rises on high value land to optimise the use of land.
User avatar
woohoo921
Joined: 04 Jun 2020
Last visit: 17 Mar 2023
Posts: 516
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 623
Posts: 516
Kudos: 142
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaB
betterscore
As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and sturdier than concrete. Moreover, in tropical areas bamboo is a much less expensive construction material than either steel or concrete and is always readily available. In tropical areas, therefore, building with bamboo makes better economic sense than building with steel or concrete, except where land values are high.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the exception noted above?


(A) Buildings constructed of bamboo are less likely to suffer earthquake damage than are steel and concrete buildings.

(B) Bamboo is unsuitable as a building material for multistory buildings.

(C) In order to protect it from being damaged by termites and beetles, bamboo must be soaked, at some expense, in a preservative.

(D) In some tropical areas, bamboo is used to make the scaffolding that is used during large construction projects.

(E) Bamboo growing in an area where land values are increasing is often cleared to make way for construction.


Building with Bamboo

Step 1: Identify the Question

The words explain the exception in the question stem indicate that this is an Explain the Discrepancy question.

Step 2: Deconstruct the Argument

Bamboo vs concrete/steel:

B at least as sturdy + cheaper → more econom. in trop. areas

BUT: high land values → B not econom.?

Step 3: Pause and State the Goal

On Explain the Discrepancy questions, start by identifying the “status quo” and the “surprise” in the argument. The status quo is that bamboo, which is cheaper and sturdier than concrete in tropical areas, is a more economical building material. For some reason, though, when land values are high, bamboo is not as economical. The right answer will explain why high land values make bamboo uneconomical.

Step 4: Work from Wrong to Right

(A) The right answer must explain why bamboo becomes less economical specifically in areas of high land value. Since the argument doesn’t state that earthquakes affect areas of high and low land value differently, this answer choice doesn’t make that distinction.

(B) CORRECT. In areas with low land values, building with bamboo makes more economic sense than building with steel and concrete. However, in areas with high land values, using steel or concrete enables multistory buildings to be constructed, while only single-story buildings can be constructed with bamboo. If land values are high, multistory buildings become more economically desirable: they have a smaller footprint, so less money needs to be spent on land. In contrast, a bamboo building of the same overall size would have a larger footprint, increasing the amount spent on land. Thus, even though steel and concrete technically cost more, their cost might be offset in areas of high land value, because using these materials allows less money to be spent on land.

(C) The right answer must explain why bamboo becomes less economical specifically in areas of high land value. Since the argument doesn’t state that termite and beetle damage affects areas of high and low land value differently, this answer choice doesn’t make that distinction.

(D) The argument deals with bamboo as a construction material, not as a scaffolding material. Its use as a scaffolding material does not imply that bamboo is uneconomical as a building material. In addition, there is not necessarily a connection between large construction projects and land values, since the answer choice does not clarify what constitutes a large construction project.

(E) This answer choice, unlike some of the other wrong answers, does draw a distinction between areas with different land values. However, it conflates increasing land values with high land values. Those aren’t necessarily the same. Also, clearing bamboo from an area might or might not affect its viability as a construction material. If bamboo is cleared from a high value area, the resulting surplus of bamboo might actually make it a more economical building material.

I see the question is generating a lot of heartache. It is actually not asking you to make any uncalled for assumption.

Consider this - when you are asked to strengthen a conclusion, if you pre-think, often you are able to come up with 2-3 different ways of strengthening, right? The correct option gives you one of those ways.

Now, this is an explain question. How can we explain the exception? I am sure there are multiple ways in which we can explain it. There must be something peculiar about construction on land of high value for which bamboo doesn't work. We need to find the option that provides us one of those ways to explain the exception. That tells us what the author had in mind while noting this exception.

(A) Buildings constructed of bamboo are less likely to suffer earthquake damage than are steel and concrete buildings.

Doesn't tell us why bamboo is unsuitable for high value land.

(B) Bamboo is unsuitable as a building material for multistory buildings.

Bamboo is unsuitable for multistorey buildings. So if someone were wishing to make a multistorey building on high value land, bamboo wouldn't be suitable for it. Certainly gives one reason to note the exception.

(C) In order to protect it from being damaged by termites and beetles, bamboo must be soaked, at some expense, in a preservative.

Irrelevant

(D) In some tropical areas, bamboo is used to make the scaffolding that is used during large construction projects.

Irrelevant

(E) Bamboo growing in an area where land values are increasing is often cleared to make way for construction.

Why is this bamboo not suitable for construction, not given.

Answer (B)

No other option tells you that bamboo is not suitable for any peculiar construction. Only (B) gives one possible reason - if you are planning to make multi-storey building on the high value land, bamboo won't work. Now, if you say how am I to know that often multi storey buildings are made on high value land, if the land is expensive, the builder is expected to try to get more value out of it. It is a fairly easy connect to make. Also, since no other option provides any feasible answer, this is the best.

TGC - You may choose to make a bungalow on the land, that's ok. The answer gives us one of the reasons why bamboo may not be suitable for high value land.

KarishmaB
Thank you for your explanation. I am still having a hard time understanding the connection between multistory buildings and a high land value. Can't you build multistory buildings on low valued land?
User avatar
GmatKnightTutor
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 31 Jan 2020
Last visit: 01 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,228
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 18
Posts: 5,228
Kudos: 1,568
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Great question to go over. Used to have a video on it on the GK YouTube channel. (E) can be pretty tempting but has a big issue with it that pretty much rules it out. Usually go over this question with students till this day!

Fun Fact: A student who knew a bit about Bamboo mentioned that the reason Bamboo is unsuitable (from what I gather) is that it is so strong it has no give in a sense. A strong wind, for example, would make it crack. Concrete buildings, on the other hand, is more forgiving and moves a bit.
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
76,994
 [2]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 76,994
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
woohoo921
KarishmaB
betterscore
As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and sturdier than concrete. Moreover, in tropical areas bamboo is a much less expensive construction material than either steel or concrete and is always readily available. In tropical areas, therefore, building with bamboo makes better economic sense than building with steel or concrete, except where land values are high.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the exception noted above?


(A) Buildings constructed of bamboo are less likely to suffer earthquake damage than are steel and concrete buildings.

(B) Bamboo is unsuitable as a building material for multistory buildings.

(C) In order to protect it from being damaged by termites and beetles, bamboo must be soaked, at some expense, in a preservative.

(D) In some tropical areas, bamboo is used to make the scaffolding that is used during large construction projects.

(E) Bamboo growing in an area where land values are increasing is often cleared to make way for construction.


Building with Bamboo

Step 1: Identify the Question

The words explain the exception in the question stem indicate that this is an Explain the Discrepancy question.

Step 2: Deconstruct the Argument

Bamboo vs concrete/steel:

B at least as sturdy + cheaper → more econom. in trop. areas

BUT: high land values → B not econom.?

Step 3: Pause and State the Goal

On Explain the Discrepancy questions, start by identifying the “status quo” and the “surprise” in the argument. The status quo is that bamboo, which is cheaper and sturdier than concrete in tropical areas, is a more economical building material. For some reason, though, when land values are high, bamboo is not as economical. The right answer will explain why high land values make bamboo uneconomical.

Step 4: Work from Wrong to Right

(A) The right answer must explain why bamboo becomes less economical specifically in areas of high land value. Since the argument doesn’t state that earthquakes affect areas of high and low land value differently, this answer choice doesn’t make that distinction.

(B) CORRECT. In areas with low land values, building with bamboo makes more economic sense than building with steel and concrete. However, in areas with high land values, using steel or concrete enables multistory buildings to be constructed, while only single-story buildings can be constructed with bamboo. If land values are high, multistory buildings become more economically desirable: they have a smaller footprint, so less money needs to be spent on land. In contrast, a bamboo building of the same overall size would have a larger footprint, increasing the amount spent on land. Thus, even though steel and concrete technically cost more, their cost might be offset in areas of high land value, because using these materials allows less money to be spent on land.

(C) The right answer must explain why bamboo becomes less economical specifically in areas of high land value. Since the argument doesn’t state that termite and beetle damage affects areas of high and low land value differently, this answer choice doesn’t make that distinction.

(D) The argument deals with bamboo as a construction material, not as a scaffolding material. Its use as a scaffolding material does not imply that bamboo is uneconomical as a building material. In addition, there is not necessarily a connection between large construction projects and land values, since the answer choice does not clarify what constitutes a large construction project.

(E) This answer choice, unlike some of the other wrong answers, does draw a distinction between areas with different land values. However, it conflates increasing land values with high land values. Those aren’t necessarily the same. Also, clearing bamboo from an area might or might not affect its viability as a construction material. If bamboo is cleared from a high value area, the resulting surplus of bamboo might actually make it a more economical building material.

I see the question is generating a lot of heartache. It is actually not asking you to make any uncalled for assumption.

Consider this - when you are asked to strengthen a conclusion, if you pre-think, often you are able to come up with 2-3 different ways of strengthening, right? The correct option gives you one of those ways.

Now, this is an explain question. How can we explain the exception? I am sure there are multiple ways in which we can explain it. There must be something peculiar about construction on land of high value for which bamboo doesn't work. We need to find the option that provides us one of those ways to explain the exception. That tells us what the author had in mind while noting this exception.

(A) Buildings constructed of bamboo are less likely to suffer earthquake damage than are steel and concrete buildings.

Doesn't tell us why bamboo is unsuitable for high value land.

(B) Bamboo is unsuitable as a building material for multistory buildings.

Bamboo is unsuitable for multistorey buildings. So if someone were wishing to make a multistorey building on high value land, bamboo wouldn't be suitable for it. Certainly gives one reason to note the exception.

(C) In order to protect it from being damaged by termites and beetles, bamboo must be soaked, at some expense, in a preservative.

Irrelevant

(D) In some tropical areas, bamboo is used to make the scaffolding that is used during large construction projects.

Irrelevant

(E) Bamboo growing in an area where land values are increasing is often cleared to make way for construction.

Why is this bamboo not suitable for construction, not given.

Answer (B)

No other option tells you that bamboo is not suitable for any peculiar construction. Only (B) gives one possible reason - if you are planning to make multi-storey building on the high value land, bamboo won't work. Now, if you say how am I to know that often multi storey buildings are made on high value land, if the land is expensive, the builder is expected to try to get more value out of it. It is a fairly easy connect to make. Also, since no other option provides any feasible answer, this is the best.

TGC - You may choose to make a bungalow on the land, that's ok. The answer gives us one of the reasons why bamboo may not be suitable for high value land.

KarishmaB
Thank you for your explanation. I am still having a hard time understanding the connection between multistory buildings and a high land value. Can't you build multistory buildings on low valued land?

Consider the conclusion:
Building with bamboo makes better economic sense than building with steel or concrete, except where land values are high.

So the author says that building with bamboo is better except where land values are high. In high value land cases, building with bamboo MAY not make better sense. The exception noted is for cases where building with bamboo may not be the better option.

Why? Because bamboo cannot be used to make multi-storey buildings. Note that it is not necessary that multi storey buildings can be made only on high land value pieces but it is LIKELY that if a piece of land has high value (because of its location, say) we will make a multi-storey building on it (the land piece will be expensive so to earn profit, multiple units of housing may be made on it and sold). Then bamboo is not a better choice.
This explains why bamboo may not be a better choice for high value land.

The official question expects you to make this link between high value land and multi storey buildings.
User avatar
woohoo921
Joined: 04 Jun 2020
Last visit: 17 Mar 2023
Posts: 516
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 623
Posts: 516
Kudos: 142
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaB
Thank you for your explanation. I am still having a hard time understanding the connection between multistory buildings and a high land value. Can't you build multistory buildings on low valued land?[/quote]

Consider the conclusion:
Building with bamboo makes better economic sense than building with steel or concrete, except where land values are high.

So the author says that building with bamboo is better except where land values are high. In high value land cases, building with bamboo MAY not make better sense. The exception noted is for cases where building with bamboo may not be the better option.

Why? Because bamboo cannot be used to make multi-storey buildings. Note that it is not necessary that multi storey buildings can be made only on high land value pieces but it is LIKELY that if a piece of land has high value (because of its location, say) we will make a multi-storey building on it (the land piece will be expensive so to earn profit, multiple units of housing may be made on it and sold). Then bamboo is not a better choice.
This explains why bamboo may not be a better choice for high value land.

The official question expects you to make this link between high value land and multi storey buildings.[/quote]


KarishmaB
Thank you so much for always being so thorough and thoughtful in your replies. You are amazing!
I have a few follow-up questions:
1.) Is this an inference question? Don't you have to assume that the land piece is expensive so as to earn a profit, multi-story buildings make sense.

2.) I am still having a hard time understanding why if bamboo is as strong as steel and sturdier than concrete, it cannot be used for multi-story buildings? The question stem tells us bamboo is as strong as steel and sturdier than concrete. So, would you be using a completely different material other than steel and concrete then for multi-story buildings (e.g., titanium)?

3.) I tried pre-thinking for this question and thought that a valid reason for this exception would be that with a high land value, the person would likely want a luxury home made of luxury materials, so they would spend more for the sake of spending (e.g., use steel or concrete because it is more expensive compared to bamboo because they would not want to be seen using a less expensive material). Is this a valid reason (if it were an answer choice)?

Thank you again for all of your time and help :)
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
76,994
 [2]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 76,994
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaB
Thank you so much for always being so thorough and thoughtful in your replies. You are amazing!
I have a few follow-up questions:
1.) Is this an inference question? Don't you have to assume that the land piece is expensive so as to earn a profit, multi-story buildings make sense.

2.) I am still having a hard time understanding why if bamboo is as strong as steel and sturdier than concrete, it cannot be used for multi-story buildings? The question stem tells us bamboo is as strong as steel and sturdier than concrete. So, would you be using a completely different material other than steel and concrete then for multi-story buildings (e.g., titanium)?

3.) I tried pre-thinking for this question and thought that a valid reason for this exception would be that with a high land value, the person would likely want a luxury home made of luxury materials, so they would spend more for the sake of spending (e.g., use steel or concrete because it is more expensive compared to bamboo because they would not want to be seen using a less expensive material). Is this a valid reason (if it were an answer choice)?

Thank you again for all of your time and help :)[/quote]

It is an 'explain' question. What could be a possible reason for the exception noted by the author. What could be a reason because of which she says that bamboo is great except for high value land. For high value land it MAY NOT be expensive. Note that it is not necessary that for high value land, bamboo is not acceptable. It may be acceptable in many cases. Someone perhaps is making a one storey house on a high value land. Bamboo is fine in that case. But in some cases, builders may make multi storey apts because the land is expensive. In those cases, bamboo is not ok. So the author notes it as an exception - that bamboo makes more economic sense as a construction material except when land is high value. Then it MAY or MAY NOT make sense.

What physical properties of bamboo make in unsuitable for multi storey buildings, we don't know and we don't have to worry about it. We are given that it is not suitable so we need to take it to be true.
The question talks about whether bamboo makes better economic sense. If someone doesn't like the aesthetics, it doesn't impact the cost factor. All the argument is saying is that bamboo will be cheaper. If someone doesn't want 'cheaper,' that's their call. It will not impact our argument.
avatar
PVOG
Joined: 18 May 2022
Last visit: 09 Nov 2022
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 66
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V42 (Online)
WE:Corporate Finance (Accounting)
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V42 (Online)
Posts: 21
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
TGC
Somehow,I am not at all with the solution that OG gave:

Following is an extract from OG-13 Solution Q94:
Multistory buildings are particularly desirable in areas where land values are high, but
bamboo may not be suitable for such buildings.


Now where in the stimulus there is mention of the above reasoning ?

It is just that we are assuming and that isn't allowed in GMAT CR?

Plz Advice

Rgds,
TGC


To anyone with a similar question, this is where you must rely on common sense to fill in the blanks, I am someone who also fails to do this from time to time (mainly on the harder level 700 questions). Yes, there is nothing in the stimulus that suggests what the original poster is saying, but this is where utilising common sense via pre-thinking can help you (although don't waste too much time pre-thinking).

As soon as I read the stimulus, my first thoughts (after 20 seconds or so) were that perhaps when creating properties on high-value land, people want to create as many properties as possible to extract as much value as they can from that land financially. For this reason, they may want to build upwards. Perhaps bamboo is NOT suitable for building upwards?

Thinking like this led me to the correct answer within a minute. Try and take 20 seconds to make sense of things after reading the stimulus, don't just take everything as it for every single question, you may need to fill some blanks in (but dont overdo this and make wild assumptions that are unreasonable).
   1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts