Abhi077
As companies worldwide tighten their purse strings in their struggle for survival,
skilled and relatively less expensive service providers overseas are bound to attract their attention. A. skilled and relatively less expensive service providers overseas are bound to attract their attention.
B. they are bound to look overseas for skilled and relatively less expensive service providers.
C. skilled and relatively less expensive service providers overseas will draw attention.
D. they might probably look overseas for skilled and relatively less expensive service providers.
E. skilled and relatively less expensive service providers overseas will be eyed
Original question is more of a cause and effect scenario.
Its real intent is to show when "companies worldwide tighten their purse" , "they are BOUND to see outside".
In Option A bound looks to be misplaced in terms of meaning. Tightening of purse doesn't bound "service providers overseas".
Again pronoun "their" in option A is ambiguous as there are multiple antecedent.
Option B -- clearly conveys the meaning.
Option C -- doesn't clearly says whose attention these service provider will draw
Option D -- "might" changes the meaning from certainty to possibility.
Option E -- Close but option B is better with closer meaning.