Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 03:32 It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 03:32
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,408
Own Kudos:
778,463
 [2]
Given Kudos: 99,987
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,408
Kudos: 778,463
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,408
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,987
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,408
Kudos: 778,463
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
AnuK2222
Joined: 17 Sep 2023
Last visit: 13 Oct 2025
Posts: 124
Own Kudos:
104
 [1]
Given Kudos: 845
Location: India
Schools: ISB '25
GPA: 3.8
WE:Project Management (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Schools: ISB '25
Posts: 124
Kudos: 104
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Firdavsiy
Joined: 26 Jun 2023
Last visit: 06 Sep 2025
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 1
Location: Uzbekistan
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
could not understand why in (2) The number of employees who ate only salads was equal to the number who ate both sandwiches and salads.

{Salads} - {Both} = {Both} ? why we subract
Bunuel
Official Solution:

At a certain company event, the snack table offered only sandwiches and salads. If 300 employees attended the event and 180 employees ate sandwiches, how many employees ate neither sandwiches nor salads?

{Total} = {Sandwiches} + {Salads} - {Both} + {Neither}

300 = 180 + {Salads} - {Both} + {Neither}

{Neither} = ?

(1) The number of employees who ate salads was equal to the number who ate neither sandwiches nor salads.

This implies {Salads} = {Neither}.

Substituting into the main equation:

300 = 180 + {Neither} - {Both} + {Neither}

300 = 180 + 2{Neither} - {Both}

We have two unknowns ({Neither} and {Both}). Cannot solve. Not sufficient.

(2) The number of employees who ate only salads was equal to the number who ate both sandwiches and salads.

This implies {Salads} - {Both} = {Both}, thus {Salads} = 2{Both}.

Substituting into the main equation:

300 = 180 + 2{Both} - {Both} + {Neither}

300 = 180 + {Both} + {Neither}

Again, two unknowns ({Both} and {Neither}). Cannot solve. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) From (1), we have 300 = 180 + 2{Neither} - {Both}. From (2), we have 300 = 180 + {Both} + {Neither}. Thus, we have two distinct linear equations with two unknowns ({Neither} and {Both}), and we can solve for {Neither}. Sufficient.

Answer: C
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,408
Own Kudos:
778,463
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99,987
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,408
Kudos: 778,463
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Firdavsiy
could not understand why in (2) The number of employees who ate only salads was equal to the number who ate both sandwiches and salads.

{Salads} - {Both} = {Both} ? why we subract
Bunuel
Official Solution:

At a certain company event, the snack table offered only sandwiches and salads. If 300 employees attended the event and 180 employees ate sandwiches, how many employees ate neither sandwiches nor salads?

{Total} = {Sandwiches} + {Salads} - {Both} + {Neither}

300 = 180 + {Salads} - {Both} + {Neither}

{Neither} = ?

(1) The number of employees who ate salads was equal to the number who ate neither sandwiches nor salads.

This implies {Salads} = {Neither}.

Substituting into the main equation:

300 = 180 + {Neither} - {Both} + {Neither}

300 = 180 + 2{Neither} - {Both}

We have two unknowns ({Neither} and {Both}). Cannot solve. Not sufficient.

(2) The number of employees who ate only salads was equal to the number who ate both sandwiches and salads.

This implies {Salads} - {Both} = {Both}, thus {Salads} = 2{Both}.

Substituting into the main equation:

300 = 180 + 2{Both} - {Both} + {Neither}

300 = 180 + {Both} + {Neither}

Again, two unknowns ({Both} and {Neither}). Cannot solve. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) From (1), we have 300 = 180 + 2{Neither} - {Both}. From (2), we have 300 = 180 + {Both} + {Neither}. Thus, we have two distinct linear equations with two unknowns ({Neither} and {Both}), and we can solve for {Neither}. Sufficient.

Answer: C


We subtract {Both} because {Salads} includes everyone who ate only salads and those who ate both salads and sandwiches. So, when we subtract {Both} from {Salads}, we get those who ate only salads. The statement says only-salad = both, so:

{Salads} - {Both} = {Both}

{Salads} = 2 * {Both}.
User avatar
laso17
Joined: 12 May 2025
Last visit: 25 May 2025
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Bunuel,

I humbly disagree with your answer.
This is because the first statement says: "employees who ate salad", intentionally omitting the "only" behind salads - which is instead present in the following statement. Therefore, according to the first statement, shouldn't we consider "salad" and "both" = "nothing", and answer A?
Bunuel
At a certain company event, the snack table offered only sandwiches and salads. If 300 employees attended the event and 180 employees ate sandwiches, how many employees ate neither sandwiches nor salads?


(1) The number of employees who ate salads was equal to the number who ate neither sandwiches nor salads.

(2) The number of employees who ate only salads was equal to the number who ate both sandwiches and salads.


Gentle note to all experts and tutors: Please refrain from replying to this question until the Official Answer (OA) is revealed. Let students attempt to solve it first. You are all welcome to contribute posts after the OA is posted. Thank you all for your cooperation!
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,408
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,987
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,408
Kudos: 778,463
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
laso17
Hi Bunuel,

I humbly disagree with your answer.
This is because the first statement says: "employees who ate salad", intentionally omitting the "only" behind salads - which is instead present in the following statement. Therefore, according to the first statement, shouldn't we consider "salad" and "both" = "nothing", and answer A?
Bunuel
At a certain company event, the snack table offered only sandwiches and salads. If 300 employees attended the event and 180 employees ate sandwiches, how many employees ate neither sandwiches nor salads?


(1) The number of employees who ate salads was equal to the number who ate neither sandwiches nor salads.

(2) The number of employees who ate only salads was equal to the number who ate both sandwiches and salads.


Gentle note to all experts and tutors: Please refrain from replying to this question until the Official Answer (OA) is revealed. Let students attempt to solve it first. You are all welcome to contribute posts after the OA is posted. Thank you all for your cooperation!

No, we shouldn't. The phrase "ate salads" includes everyone who ate salads, whether only salads or both. It does not exclude those who ate both unless it says "only salads." So your interpretation that "salads" means "only salads" is incorrect.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105408 posts
496 posts