Last visit was: 17 May 2026, 22:32 It is currently 17 May 2026, 22:32
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
   1   2 
User avatar
vv65
User avatar
Joined: 01 Mar 2015
Last visit: 30 Apr 2026
Posts: 536
Own Kudos:
405
 [1]
Given Kudos: 773
Location: India
GMAT 1: 740 Q47 V44
GMAT 1: 740 Q47 V44
Posts: 536
Kudos: 405
 [1]
At the beginning of the year, the city allocated $150 million to cover 29 Nov 2020, 18:55
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
At the beginning of the year, the city allocated $150 million to cover the increase in wages that it expected to approve as a result of negotiations with the municipal labor unions.

(A) increase in wages that it expected to approve as a result of negotiations
(B) increased wages it expected to approve from negotiations
(C) increasing wages expected to be approved as a result of negotiating
(D) negotiated increases in wages it expected to approve
(E) increases expected to be approved in wages from negotiating

Show more
I eliminated all the answer choices in my first pass.
In the second round I looked at splits and focused on easy stuff.

First split:
- FROM negotiations / AS A RESULT of negotiations
- FROM negotiations is wrong
- eliminate B and E

Left with A, C, D

C says "increasing wages"
-means wages would increase continuously
- changes the meaning from "increased wages", which means a one-time increase
- eliminate C

D says "expected to approve with the municipal labour unions"
- changes the meaning
- the unions have no role in approving
- eliminate D

Left only with A

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
chiragthukral
avatar
Joined: 19 Dec 2020
Last visit: 12 Jun 2021
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
35
Given Kudos: 21
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V32
Products:
My Reviews
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V32
Posts: 16
Kudos: 35
At the beginning of the year, the city allocated $150 million to cover 13 May 2021, 11:23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Why are we seeking the original intent of the sentence from the beginning.
It is reiterated many times by sayantanc2k that the correct answer can differ from the meaning.
Also, what is the process of elimination in this question?
User avatar
AnkithaSrinivas
User avatar
Joined: 28 Sep 2020
Last visit: 01 Apr 2022
Posts: 84
Own Kudos:
20
Given Kudos: 124
Location: India
Posts: 84
Kudos: 20
At the beginning of the year, the city allocated $150 million to cover 16 May 2021, 01:27
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
anantgupta93
Still not sure why A is right. In fact, I couldn't find solid reasons to do any elimination. Can you help? GMATNinja?
Show more

At the beginning of the year, the city allocated $150 million to cover the increase in wages that it expected to approve as a result of negotiations with the municipal labor unions.

(A) increase in wages that it expected to approve as a result of negotiations
(B) increased wages it expected to approve from negotiations
(C) increasing wages expected to be approved as a result of negotiating
(D) negotiated increases in wages it expected to approve
(E) increases expected to be approved in wages from negotiating

Was down to A and C -
in C, to be approved.. by whom? not clear
User avatar
mSKR
User avatar
Joined: 14 Aug 2019
Last visit: 10 Mar 2024
Posts: 1,207
Own Kudos:
964
Given Kudos: 381
Location: Hong Kong
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
Schools: IE (A) IIML-IPMX '22 (A) HKUST '22
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GPA: 3.81
Schools: IE (A) IIML-IPMX '22 (A) HKUST '22
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
Posts: 1,207
Kudos: 964
At the beginning of the year, the city allocated $150 million to cover 17 May 2021, 19:51
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I reject E beccause:

(E) increases expected to be approved in wages from negotiating
the meaning comes out to be wrong: increase is not from negotiating but increase needs to be approved.
avatar
brianmontanaweb
avatar
Joined: 06 Apr 2022
Last visit: 03 Sep 2022
Posts: 108
Own Kudos:
15
Given Kudos: 22
Posts: 108
Kudos: 15
At the beginning of the year, the city allocated $150 million to cover 27 Apr 2022, 08:56
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
RaviChandra
At the beginning of the year, the city allocated $150 million to cover the increase in wages that it expected to approve as a result of negotiations with the municipal labor unions.

(A) increase in wages that it expected to approve as a result of negotiations
(B) increased wages it expected to approve from negotiations
(C) increasing wages expected to be approved as a result of negotiating
(D) negotiated increases in wages it expected to approve
(E) increases expected to be approved in wages from negotiating
Show more

B changes the meaning of the original sentence and "increased" is incorrectly applied to wages since it hasn't happened but is happening.

C incorrectly uses "increasing wages", which means something that will continue to happen. This is a singular increase.

D changes the meaning completely and logically doesn't make sense

E same issue as D

A correctly uses "increase in wages". It maintains parallelism between "At the beginning of the year, the city allocated" and "that it expected", which can be transcribed to "At the beginning of the year, the city expected"
User avatar
Raman109
User avatar
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Last visit: 28 Jul 2025
Posts: 703
Own Kudos:
214
Given Kudos: 33
Posts: 703
Kudos: 214
At the beginning of the year, the city allocated $150 million to cover 30 Dec 2023, 06:42
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
At the beginning of the year, the city allocated $150 million to cover the increase in wages that it expected to approve as a result of negotiations with the municipal labor unions.

Option Elimination -

(A) increase in wages that it expected to approve as a result of negotiations - the right cause-effect relationship. Cause "negotiations" and effect "the increase."
(B) increased wages it expected to approve from negotiations - "increased wages" means that wages already increased but the intended meaning is that they'll increase as a result of negotiations. "from negotiations" is wrong.
(C) increasing wages expected to be approved as a result of negotiating - "increasing wages" means as if the wages are already increasing, but the intended meaning is that they'll increase after negotiations.
(D) negotiated increases in wages it expected to approve - "negotiated increases" means the increases are already negotiated and not the intended meaning, that is, the increase after the negotiations. Moreover, "the increases" means that there are multiple increases.
(E) increases expected to be approved in wages from negotiating - a total mess. "increases"? To be approved? Passive? By whom? From negotiating?
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7393 posts
AbhishekP220108
575 posts
bhanu29
368 posts