Last visit was: 12 Jun 2025, 17:27 It is currently 12 Jun 2025, 17:27
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
anindame
Joined: 20 Jan 2013
Last visit: 20 Oct 2022
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
189
 [60]
Given Kudos: 70
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V41
GPA: 3.42
Products:
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V41
Posts: 28
Kudos: 189
 [60]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
53
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 12 Jun 2025
Posts: 11,303
Own Kudos:
41,103
 [8]
Given Kudos: 333
Status:Math and DI Expert
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 11,303
Kudos: 41,103
 [8]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Vanmotan
Joined: 06 Apr 2016
Last visit: 26 Dec 2020
Posts: 49
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 66
Status:No matter how bad it is or how bad it gets: I am going to make it.
Location: Ukraine
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V32
GMAT 2: 730 Q50 V38
GPA: 3.8
WE:Sales (Other)
Products:
GMAT 2: 730 Q50 V38
Posts: 49
Kudos: 104
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
StillON
Joined: 10 Jun 2020
Last visit: 16 Oct 2021
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
4
 [1]
Given Kudos: 111
Posts: 15
Kudos: 4
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can someone please explain why B is preferred over D, which shows that the company is not reluctant to make investments in new technology (cost burden)
avatar
atrip009
Joined: 04 May 2021
Last visit: 22 Aug 2024
Posts: 5
Given Kudos: 18
GMAT 1: 670 Q47 V35
Products:
GMAT 1: 670 Q47 V35
Posts: 5
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
StillON

I believe option B hits the main argument directly, i.e., corporate profits. Option D leaves it on the reader to interpret that something extra, in this case additional cost on construction techniques.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Rickooreo
Joined: 24 Dec 2021
Last visit: 15 Feb 2023
Posts: 305
Own Kudos:
30
 [2]
Given Kudos: 240
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35
GPA: 3.95
WE:Real Estate (Consulting)
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35
Posts: 305
Kudos: 30
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaB ReedArnoldMPREP GMATNinja ExpertsGlobal5 MartyTargetTestPrep RonTargetTestPrep

OA – B
I eliminated B because it says, reluctant to invest … until profits … have stabilized.
Its just like once funding for the purchase of carbon tubing is secured they will invest, its not that they will not invest at all.
Whereas
Option D – that since they will have to incur cost (for new construction tech) which will impact profit, so they are being profit oriented and not listening to consumer demand.

Can you please correct me
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 12 Jun 2025
Posts: 16,040
Own Kudos:
73,632
 [1]
Given Kudos: 472
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,040
Kudos: 73,632
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
anindame
Automobile manufacturers defend their substitution of steel frames in cars with cheaper plastic components by claiming that consumer demand is ruled by a desire for light cars with crumple zones rather than as a result of corporate profit motives. However, if this trend were true, then carbon reinforced tubing, which is lighter than steel and stronger, would be available as an option. It is not.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument against the automobile manufacturer's claim?

A)When carbon tubing was introduced in the market place, it was not yet commercially viable to produce it in large volumes.

B)Automobile companies are reluctant to invest in high volume industrial technology to produce carbon tubing until profits from the sale of small scale commercial carbon products, such as bicycle frames, have stabilized.

C)Some types of carbon tubing for sports equipment are in such high demand that there is a back log of several weeks for orders.

D)Because carbon tubing has entirely different chemical properties from plastic frame components, new construction techniques will be required for automobiles.

E)Any valid comparison among steel, plastic and carbon frames must be based on identical performance measures.

We need to give an option that is against the claim.
What is the claim? - We are driven by a desire for light cars, not by profit motives.


A)When carbon tubing was introduced in the market place, it was not yet commercially viable to produce it in large volumes.

Talks about the past - when it was introduced. We don't know what the present situation is.

B)Automobile companies are reluctant to invest in high volume industrial technology to produce carbon tubing until profits from the sale of small scale commercial carbon products, such as bicycle frames, have stabilized.

Companies don't want to invest in this tech until the tech has proved "profitable" in another industry. This means the companies are focussing on profitability.
Hence, it is against the claim of the companies.

C)Some types of carbon tubing for sports equipment are in such high demand that there is a back log of several weeks for orders.

Whether the backlog is because of unavailability of carbon tubing, we don't know. But even if we assume that it is, then it is a valid reason why carbon tubing is not a good substitute. Irrespective of cost, it doesn't seem to be available. Then it is not against the claim since carbon tubing may not be a viable substitute.

D)Because carbon tubing has entirely different chemical properties from plastic frame components, new construction techniques will be required for automobiles.

Till some time ago, the companies had infra for steel frames. They started using plastic components. We don't know whether plastic worked on the same infra or new infra had to be created. We don't know whether carbon tubes would have worked on the same steel frame infra or new infra would have been required.
For a meaningful distinction, we need to compare the infra required for plastic and carbon components with infra required for steel frames. Option (D) compares carbon infra with plastic infra.
Besides, it says that carbon will need new construction tech. Is it available (irrespective of cost), we don't know. Then, the issue might be of viability rather commercials.

E)Any valid comparison among steel, plastic and carbon frames must be based on identical performance measures.

Doesn't imply anything about the claim.

Answer (B)
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,371
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,371
Kudos: 946
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7324 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts