yogesh1984 wrote:
Before M.S. Dhoni
won the world cup for India, he was fairly poor.A) won the world cup for India, he was fairly poor.
B) had won the world cup for India, he was fairly poor.
C) won the world cup for India, he had been fairly poor.
D) won the world cup for India, he were a poor to a fair extent.
E) wins the world cup for India, he had been fairly poor.
Please pour in your thoughts
sudhir18n's explanation makes perfect sense.
A) Before M.S. Dhoni
won the world cup for India, he was fairly poor.This is not grammatically incorrect, but perhaps doesn't convey what it intends to. This sentence tells us that Dhoni was poor, then after few years(say 20 years) he won the world cup and became rich. So, we don't know the clear picture of the 20 years between him being poor AND him winning the cup. What was he during these 20 years-- rich, poor.
C) clears the doubt.
Dhoni was constantly poor until he won the World Cup. This continuous event prior to his win is correctly described by "had been". "was" doesn't describe the progressive too well.
Not to confuse you, but in reality, Dhoni actually got richer much before winning the WC, thus raising a doubt which statement to choose. Also, "A" and "C" both seem correct for someone who doesn't know who is Dhoni. Whether he was poor until the win or poor long before winning the WC.
Not GMAT like.